AOC

Green New Deal Scam Destroyed By New Scientific Study On Global Warming

AOC, Justice Democrats, New Green Deal zealots and Technocrats everywhere will grind their teeth over this new research. The scientists concluded, “anthropogenic climate change does not exist in practice.” ⁃ TN Editor

A new scientific study could bust wide open deeply flawed fundamental assumptions underlying controversial climate legislation and initiatives such as the Green New Deal, namely, the degree to which ‘climate change’ is driven by natural phenomena vs. man-made issues measured as carbon footprint. Scientists in Finland found “practically no anthropogenic [man-made]climate change” after a series of studies.

“During the last hundred years the temperature increased about 0.1°C because of carbon dioxide. The human contribution was about 0.01°C”, the Finnish researchers bluntly state in one among a series of papers.

This has been collaborated by a team at Kobe University in Japan, which has furthered the Finnish researchers’ theory: “New evidence suggests that high-energy particles from space known as galactic cosmic rays affect the Earth’s climate by increasing cloud cover, causing an ‘umbrella effect’,” the just published study has found, a summary of which has been released in the journal Science Daily. The findings are hugely significant given this ‘umbrella effect’ — an entirely natural occurrence  could be the prime driver of climate warming, and not man-made factors.

The scientists involved in the study are most concerned with the fact that current climate models driving the political side of debate, most notably the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) climate sensitivity scale, fail to incorporate this crucial and potentially central variable of increased cloud cover.

“The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has discussed the impact of cloud cover on climate in their evaluations, but this phenomenon has never been considered in climate predictions due to the insufficient physical understanding of it,” comments Professor Hyodo in Science Daily. “This study provides an opportunity to rethink the impact of clouds on climate. When galactic cosmic rays increase, so do low clouds, and when cosmic rays decrease clouds do as well, so climate warming may be caused by an opposite-umbrella effect.”

In their related paper, aptly titled, “No experimental evidence for the significant anthropogenic [man-made] climate change”, the Finnish scientists find that low cloud cover “practically” controls global temperatures but that “only a small part” of the increased carbon dioxide concentration is anthropogenic, or caused by human activity.

The following is a key bombshell section in one of the studies conducted by Finland’s Turku University team:

We have proven that the GCM-models used in IPCC report AR5 cannot compute correctly the natural component included in the observed global temperature. The reason is that the models fail to derive the influences of low cloud cover fraction on the global temperature. A too small natural component results in a too large portion for the contribution of the greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide. That is why 6 J. KAUPPINEN AND P. MALMI IPCC represents the climate sensitivity more than one order of magnitude larger than our sensitivity 0.24°C. Because the anthropogenic portion in the increased CO2 is less than 10 %, we have practically no anthropogenic climate change. The low clouds control mainly the global temperature.

This raises urgent questions and central contradictions regarding current models which politicians and environmental groups across the globe are using to push radical economic changes on their countries’ populations.

Conclusions from both the Japanese and Finnish studies strongly suggest, for example, that Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s “drastic measures to cut carbon emissions” which would ultimately require radical legislation changes to “remake the U.S. economy” would not only potentially bankrupt everyone but simply wouldn’t even work, at least according to the new Finnish research team findings.

To put AOC’s “drastic measures” in perspective  based entirely on the fundamental assumption of the monumental and disastrous impact of human activity on the climate — consider the following conclusions from the Finnish studies:

“During the last hundred years the temperature increased about 0.1°C because of carbon dioxide. The human contribution was about 0.01°C.

Read full story here…




NASA

NASA Persists In False Claim That 97% Of Climate Scientists Agree On Global Warming

Scientific corruption at NASA is blatant, producing propaganda designed to further its own Technocrat existence. NASA has persistently refused to remove false assertions about climate studies.  ⁃ TN Editor

On Tuesday, the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) sent NASA a formal complaint, asking the agency to withdraw the false claim that 97 percent of climate scientists agree that humans are the primary cause of global warming and climate change. The 2013 study purporting to demonstrate that number was fatally flawed and proved no such thing.

“The claim that 97% of climate scientists believe humans are the primary cause of global warming is simply false,” CEI attorney Devin Watkins said in a statement. “That figure was created only by ignoring many climate scientists’ views, including those of undecided scientists. It is time that NASA correct the record and present unbiased figures to the public.”

According to the CEI complaint, NASA’s decision to repeat the false claim violated the Information Quality Act (IQA). Specifically, NASA claimed that “[n]inety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities.” The claim appears on the NASA website on the page “Climate Change: How Do We Know?”

The claim traces back to a study led by John Cook entitled “Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature” and published in the journal Environmental Research Letters in 2013.

The study is fundamentally dishonest, as the CEI complaint explains. The study analyzed all published peer-reviewed academic research papers from 1991 to 2011 that use the terms “global warming” or “global climate change.” The study placed the papers into seven categories: explicit endorsement with quantification, saying humans are responsible for 50+ percent of climate change; explicit endorsement without quantification; implicit endorsement; no position or uncertain; implicit rejection; explicit rejection with qualification; and explicit rejection without qualification.

The study found: 64 papers had explicitly endorsed anthropogenic global warming (AGW) with quantification (attributing at least half of climate change to humans); 922 papers had explicitly endorsed AGW without quantifying how much humans contribute; 2,910 papers had implicitly endorsed AGW; 7,930 papers did not state a position and 40 papers were uncertain; 54 papers implicitly rejected AGW by affirming the possibility that natural causes explain climate change; 15 papers explicitly rejected AGW without qualification; and 9 papers explicitly rejected AGW with quantification, saying human contributions to global warming are negligible.

So how did Cook and his team come up with the 97 percent number? They added up the first three categories (3,896 papers), compared them to the last three categories (78 papers) and the papers expressing uncertainty (40 papers), and completely ignored the nearly 8,000 papers that did not state a position.

Of the papers Cook’s team characterized as stating a position, 97 percent (3,896 of the 4,014 papers) favored the idea of man-made global warming.

See the problem? The study completely discounted the majority of the papers it analyzed (66.4 percent — 7,930 of the 11,944 papers analyzed). With those papers included, only 32.6 percent of the papers explicitly or implicitly endorsed AGW (3,896 of 11,944 papers).

Read full story here…




France

Leaving France? Expect ‘Eco-Tax’ On Your Flight Out

France claims that airplane contrails (ice crystals) contribute to global warming and therefore travelers should be punished with an eco-tax to offset their destructive travel habits. ⁃ TN Editor

France will introduce an “eco-tax” of up to €18 (£16.19) on tickets for all flights leaving the country, the government has announced.

Transport minister Elisabeth Borne told a news conference that the €180m (£162m) it is expected to raise annually from 2020, would finance daily transport in the country.

The new tax will range from €1.50 for short-haul flights and up to €18 for long-haul journeys in business class.

The move comes amid an escalating planetary climate emergency which is disproportionally being caused by the tiny percentage of people who use planes for transport.

Only around five per cent of the world’s population takes flights, but air travel contributes an estimated two per cent of the globe’s total carbon emissions.

But a new study suggests the overall effects of flying could be far more damaging to the climate than first thought.

It identified trails left by planes in the sky as a far more damaging effect on the climate than all the carbon dioxide ever emitted from their engines.

The tracks – called contrails – linger in the sky as ice clouds and trap heat in the Earth’s atmosphere.

This is an unaccounted source of climate warming from air travel, and researchers from the Institute of Atmospheric Physics (IAP) in Germany said the problem is set to triple by 2050.

Read full story here…




pope

Pope Appeals To Global Warming Deniers, Asks For Carbon Pricing

Pope Francis is thoroughly deceived on the green agenda of Sustainable Development and global warming. He says “doomsday predictions can no longer be dismissed.” ⁃ TN Editor

Pope Francis said on Friday that carbon pricing is “essential” to stem global warming – his clearest statement yet in support of penalising polluters – and appealed to climate change deniers to listen to science.

In an address to energy executives at the end of a two-day meeting, he also called for “open, transparent, science-based and standardised” reporting of climate risk and a “radical energy transition” away from carbon to save the planet.

Carbon pricing, via taxes or emissions trading schemes, is used by many governments to make energy consumers pay for the costs of using the fossil fuels that contribute to global warming, and to spur investment in low-carbon technology.

The Vatican said attendees of the closed-door meeting at its Academy of Sciences, a follow-up to one a year ago, included the CEOs of Royal Dutch Shell, Eni, BP, Repsol, Conoco Phillips, Chevron, ExxonMobil, and executives of investment funds.

“Collectively, these leaders will influence the planet’s future, perhaps more than any in the world,” said Father John Jenkins, president of the U.S. University of Notre Dame, which organised the meeting.

A small group of demonstrators gathered outside a Vatican gate. One held a sign reading “Dear Oil CEOs – Think of Your Children”.

Francis, who has made many calls for environmental protection and has clashed over climate change with leaders such as U.S. President Donald Trump, said the ecological crisis “threatens the very future of the human family”.

He criticised those who, like Trump, doubt the science that shows human activity is causing the earth to heat up.

“For too long we have collectively failed to listen to the fruits of scientific analysis, and doomsday predictions can no longer be met with irony or disdain,” Francis said. Discussion of climate change and energy transition must be rooted in “the best scientific research available today”.

Trump, asked in an interview if he accepted climate science, said last week: “I believe there’s a change in weather, and I think it changes both ways.”

He has said the United States will withdraw from the Paris accord, a 2016 global agreement to fight climate change.

Francis, who wrote an encyclical – a significant document on Church teaching – in 2015 on protection of the environment, and strongly supports the Paris accord, said time was running out to meet its goals.

“Faced with a climate emergency, we must take action accordingly, in order to avoid perpetrating a brutal act of injustice towards the poor and future generations,” he said.

“We do not have the luxury of waiting for others to step forward, or of prioritising short-term economic benefits.”

Read full story here…




climate change

Extensive Anthology That Refutes Man-Made Global Warming

Here is an extensive collection of articles debunking global warming and man-made climate change, by experts and scientists around the world. This collection is worth saving for the next time you are challenged for facts and authoritative sources.  ⁃ TN Editor

What I Learned about Climate Change: The Science is not Settled

Countering The Fallacy Of Global Warming

Fifty Years Of Failed Apocalyptic Forecasts

The ever receding climate goalpost: IPCC and Al Gore “12 years to save the planet” (again)

https://jonova.s3.amazonaws.com/…

The Environmentalist Left Has to Grapple with Its Failed, Alarmist Predictions | National Review

18 Spectacularly Wrong Apocalyptic Predictions Made Around the Time of the First Earth Day in 1970 – Frontiers of Freedom

Earth Day, 2019: Fifty Years of Apocalyptic Global Warming Predictions and Why People Believe Them, Part 1

Al Gore’s 2007 prediction that all arctic ice would be gone by 2014 now proven to be alarming fear mongering

Deja Vu: Media Again Warn Only 10-12 Years for Climate Action

Apocalypse Delayed | National Review

Credit Rating Agencies and ‘Climate Change’ More absurd predictions

https://www.thegwpf.org/content/…

Prominent French Scientist Reverses Belief in Global Warming – Now a Skeptic

The U.N.’s Global Warming War On Capitalism: An Important History Lesson

How UN Scientists Are Preparing For The End Of Capitalism

Climate change: this is the worst scientific scandal of our generation

Climategate 2.0: New E-Mails Rock The Global Warming Debate

Climategate 2.0

How to Discuss Global Warming with a “Climate Alarmist.” Scientific Talking Points to Win the Debate.

More Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims – Global Research

http://www.populartechnology.net…

Leading Scientists Debunk Climate Alarmism | David J. Theroux

‘Global warming is not a crisis!’: Studying climate change skepticism on the Web

Climate Change Is Real. Too Bad Accurate Climate Models Aren’t.

Flawed Climate Models

New Paper: Computer Predictions Of Climate Alarm Are Flawed

World’s top climate scientists confess: Global warming is just QUARTER

Climate Scientist: 73 UN Climate Models Wrong, No Global Warming in 17 Years

What You Never Hear About Global Warming — Sott.net

Satellites and Global Warming: Dr. Christy Sets the Record Straight

An interesting plot twist – call it an anomaly

Updated Global Temperature: No global warming for 17 years, 6 months – (No Warming for 210 Months)

No global warming at all for 18 years 9 months – a new record – The Pause lengthens again – just in time for UN Summit in Paris

How NOAA/NASA Doctored Temperature Data To Get Record Warm Years | PSI Intl

100% Of US Warming Is Due To NOAA Data Tampering

The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever

BREAKING: NOAA Fiddles With Climate Data To Erase The 15-Year Global Warming ‘Hiatus’

Massive Data Tampering Uncovered At NASA – Warmth, Cooling Disappears Due To Incompatibility With Models

Climate scientists versus climate data

Climate change whistleblower alleges NOAA manipulated data to hide global warming ‘pause’

Climate Scientists Rewriting The Past

Should Michael ‘Hockey Stick’ Mann be Prosecuted for Climate Fraud? | PSI Intl

Climatology Sees One Of The Greatest Scientific Reversals Of All Time – The Rise And Fall Of The Hockey Stick Charts

Doubling The Hockey Stick Fraud

http://joannenova.com.au/2009/12…

IPCC HOCKEY STICK CURVE DEBUNKED STILL FURTHER

17 New (2017) Scientific Papers Affirm Today’s Warming Is Not Global, Unprecedented, Or Remarkable

Global Warming Bombshell

Index of /FOIA

Learn More About Climate Change

A New Low in Climate Science

Medieval Warm Period

Erasing The Medieval Warm Period

Easterbrook on the magnitude of Greenland GISP2 ice core data

In The Real World, Existential Threat of Global Warming + Climate Change Is A Double-Nothingburger

The Disgraceful Episode Of Lysenkoism Brings Us Global Warming Theory

What consensus? Less than half of climate scientists agree with the IPCC “95%” certainty

https://www.friendsofscience.org…

Oregon Petition (1998) Signed by 31,000+ Scientists and Experts

‘97% Of Climate Scientists Agree’ Is 100% Wrong

97 Articles Refuting The “97% Consensus” | Climate Dispatch

The 97 Percent Solution | National Review

The Myth of the Climate Change ‘97%’

Cook’s 97% Scam Debunked

97% Consequential Misperceptions: Ethics of Consensus on Global Warming

http://www.populartechnology.net…

Shock Poll: Meteorologists Are Global Warming Skeptics

Spot the Vested Interest: The $1.5 Trillion Climate Change Industry

https://www.investors.com/politi…

Curry Report: Sea-level rise within natural variation of past several thousand years

New Paper: Antarctic Sea Ice Growing, Not Shrinking

Ocean Acidification by Fossil Fuel Emissions

Ocean Acidification Claims are Misleading – and deliberately so | PSI Intl

Ocean Acidification is a lie

http://joannenova.com.au/2011/11…

FOI’s Reveal How NOAA Spin Lies About Ocean Acidification

The Myth of Ocean Acidification by Carbon Dioxide

What does the science really say about global warming and Midwest floods?

Solar activity predicted to fall 60% in 2030s, to ‘mini ice age’ levels: Sun driven by double dynamo

Ignore The Scare-Mongers: Number & Intensity Of US Hurricanes Have Remained Constant Since 1900 – The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF)

Does CO2 correlate with temperature history? – A look at multiple timescales in the context of the Shakun et al. paper

The Greenhouse Effect Fallacy

Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics

The fallacy of the greenhouse effect

http://www.thesavvystreet.com/th…

Last 100 Years of CO2 & Temperatures: The IPCC’s HadCRUT Data Confirms CO2’s Small Impact On Global Warming

CO2 Science

http://co2coalition.org/wp-conte…

The 800 year lag in CO2 after temperature – graphed

New research in Antarctica shows CO2 follows temperature “by a few hundred years at most”

Non-Existent Relationship …CO2-Temperature Correlation Only 15% Of Last 165 Years

Climate Scandals: List Of 94 Climate-Gates

Why Politicized Science is Dangerous

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2010…

https://climatechangedispatch.co…

Editorial bias and the prediction of climate disaster: the crisis of science communication

Matt Ridley: The Climate Wars And The Damage To Science

Science Is In Deep Trouble, New Paper Shows

Fatally Flawed Climate Science Paper ‘Should Be Withdrawn’

Robust Evidence NOAA Temperature Data Hopelessly Corrupted By Warming Bias, Manipulation

List of scientists who disagree with the scientific consensus on global warming – Wikipedia

A look at carbon dioxide vs. global temperature

The inconvenient truth about the Ice core Carbon Dioxide Temperature Correlations

Alleged Correlation between CO2 and Global Warming

Miami Herald: Search Results

Pachauri: It’s Too Late to Fight Climate Change

Central England Temperatures: Do They Provide Evidence That Current Global Warming Scare Is Totally Blown Out of Proportion?

No Trend In Extreme Weather In The US

Embarrassing fail…IPCC

The History Of The Modern “Climate Change” Scam

Climate Racketeering

Climate “Science” on Trial; Data Chiropractioners “Adjust” Data

https://www.investors.com/politi…

Table of Contents

http://www.warwickhughes.com/hoy…

3 Chemists Conclude CO2 Greenhouse Effect Is ‘Unreal’, Violates Laws Of Physics, Thermodynamics

New Insights on the Physical Nature of the Atmospheric Greenhouse Effect Deduced from an Empirical Planetary Temperature Model

Full text of “Fritz Vahrenholt The Neglected Sun”

Solar Evidence of Global Warming

Cosmoclimatology: a new theory emerges

The missing link between exploding stars, clouds, and climate on Earth: Breakthrough in understanding of how cosmic rays from supernovae can influence Earth’s cloud cover and thereby climate

Cosmic influences on the atmosphere

Depak Lal: India Should Join U.S. And Abandon Paris Agreement – The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF)

Temperature History

Historical Temperatures – Charts/Graphs

UK December coldest for 100 years

What Science Reveals About Climate Change

New Paper Documents Main Reasons For International Controversy About The IPCC’s SR1.5 Report

GWPF Welcomes Grantham Institute Acknowledgement That “CO2 Benefits Are Indeed Good News”

Royal Society Misrepresents Climate Science

Pandelidis climate column riddled with errors

Evidence Mounts Against Climate Prediction That Inspired ‘Day After Tomorrow’ Disaster Flick

The global warming salesmen are polluting science again

Scientists Prove Man-Made Global Warming Is A Hoax

Al Gore’s Inconvenient Reality: The Former Vice President’s Home Energy Use Surges up to 34 Times the National Average Despite Costly Green Renovations, by Drew Johnson

C3

The March for … What?

Global Temperature Graphs

Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide and Aerosols: Effects of Large Increases on Global Climate Will cause harmful global cooling!

A history of fears about the climate: Fabius Maximus website

World leaders duped by manipulated global warming data

Nobel Prize-Winning Scientist Who Endorsed Obama Now Says Prez. is ‘Ridiculous’ & ‘Dead Wrong’ on ‘Global Warming’

Obama’s Motorcade for Climate Change Talks Costing $784,825 – Washington Free Beacon

What global warming? Antarctic ice is INCREASING by 135billion tonnes a year, says NASA

https://www.investors.com/climat…

https://www.investors.com/global…

Here are a few useful websites/blogs:

Watts Up With That?

The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF) – Common Sense on Climate Change

JoNova

Climate Change Archives

climate science

Global Climate Scam

Climate Depot

Climate Etc.

Welcome

The Deplorable Climate Science Blog

“Not here to worship what is known, but to question it” – Jacob Bronowski. Climate and energy news from Germany in English – by Pierre L. Gosselin

Youtube videos:

For light-hearted: Dilbert on Climate Change

Read full story here…




Geoengineering

Geoengineering Could Start WWIII As Nations React

Weaponizing weather has been a military goal since WWI, but as global warming hysteria proceeded, it was used to ‘cool’ the earth. However, weather does not respect national borders and what one country does can radically affect the weather in its neighbors. ⁃ TN Editor

Climate change may end up causing World War 3 if individual countries start to try and save themselves by hacking the weather with a process called geoengineering.

Many experts are in favour of geoengineering, which involves manipulating the atmosphere by blocking sunlight or isolating excess carbon, but weather hacking in one region could have negative impacts in another and lead to global conflict, according to scientists.

It is solar geoengineering that appears to be the most problematic and not so much carbon capture because solar geoengineering would involve spraying chemicals into the air that would block some sunlight.

When speaking on the sun blocking topic, geoengineering researcher Juan Moreno-Cruz told Business Insider: “The threat of war never is out of the question.”

If geoengineering is going to happen then all countries would have to be informed and agree because some areas may be more negatively effected than others.

Andrea Flossmann, a scientist at the World Meteorological Organization, explained in a WMO report: “The atmosphere has no walls. What you add may not have the desired effect in your vicinity, but by being transported along might have undesired effects elsewhere.”

Earth’s temperatures are set to soar to dangerous levels so a lot of scientists think the unknown consequences of geoengineering are worth the risk.

The worse case scenario is that Earth’s atmospheric chemistry is irreversibly altered and causes freak weather conditions like monsoons, hurricanes and heatwaves that could kill thousands and increase global tensions.

Read full story here…




Ohio

Ohio Rejects Renewables Mandate To Back Nuclear, Coal

This only proves that renewable energy is not a fait accompli as Sustainable Development wonks suppose. The partial rejection of renewable energy favors nuclear power over wind and solar, but has pitted the oil and gas industry against nuclear.  ⁃ TN Editor

The Ohio House on Wednesday passed a bill 53-43 that would subsidize nuclear and coal plants while eliminating a green energy mandate that now pushes utilities to more renewable energy and efficiency resources.

The “clean air program” would raise $190 million annually, charging ratepayers up to $1 monthly through 2026, mostly to fund First Energy Solutions’ Davis-Besse and Perry nuclear plants. The bill would also allow electric distribution utilities to charge customers a monthly fee, which requires state regulatory approval, to recover part of their ownership stake in Ohio Valley Electric Corporation’s (OVEC) Kyger Creek and Indiana-based Clifty Creek coal-fired plants.

The bill is expected to pass the Senate due to the support of Republicans and Gov. Mike DeWine, R, according to research firm ClearView Energy Partners VP Tim Fox, although state senators haven’t gone on the record to support nuclear subsidies. Ohio is expected to enact a nuclear assistance program before June 26, based on the deadlines FES has set to continue operation of its nuclear plants, Fox said in a note to clients.

While the House brought back some renewable provisions that had been stripped out in committee, advocates for renewable energy, natural gas and consumer rights bemoaned the passage of the bill, hailing it as a way to achieve President Donald Trump’s goal to subsidize coal plants.

By repealing the state’s broad renewable portfolio standard, the bill would eliminate a monthly surcharge of less than $5 from residential customers to help utilities obtain 12.5% of their power from renewable resources by 2027.

But while the bill eliminates the mandate, it contains other renewable provisions that helped garner support from 10 of 38 Democrats.

One amendment helped reduce permitting risk for the approval of small on-site industrial wind facilities, increasing the maximum from 5 MW to 20 MW for on-location self-generation wind-farms that could avoid Ohio Power Siting Board review. Another made room for five large-scale solar power projects to qualify for funding from the “clean air” program, after a House committee had stripped the bill of most of its renewable components.

But while some were glad to see at least some renewable provisions in the bill, oil and gas groups blasted the nuclear support provisions as unnecessary.

Read full story here…




Joe Biden

Joe Biden’s ‘Green Revolution’ Isn’t Good Enough For Ocasio-Cortez

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is dominating the Democrat 2020 presidential race with her radical “Green New Deal” rhetoric. As she charges candidate Joe Biden with being too middle-of-the-road on global warming, Biden immediately defends. ⁃ TN Editor

Former Vice President Joe Biden said during a campaign stop on Monday that we need a “green revolution” to tackle climate change, which could serve as an alternative to other 2020 Democrat presidential candidates’ Green New Deal.

During a campaign stop in Hampton, New Hampshire, on Monday, Biden disputed one article’s suggestion that he took the “middle ground” on the environment. He told members of the audience to look up PolitiFact, which allegedly confirms that Biden has been a “leader” on climate change.

Biden touted that, while he was vice president, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) doubled the gas mileage standards and moved to have more electric automobile charging stations across the nation.

Biden said that he will announce his plan for a “green revolution” by the end of the month.

Many Democrat presidential candidates such as Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Kamala Harris (D-CA), and Cory Booker (D-NJ) have made headlines by touting their Green New Deal plan to tackle climate change.

The former vice president also said, back in 1987, that “we have an existential threat” due to climate change and if “we don’t act quickly we will basically lose everything we have.”

“It’s even more urgent now,” Biden added.

Biden said, “We do need to finish this green revolution and we can do it in a way that’s rational, we can do it, afford it, and get it done now.”

Read full story here…




Extinction Rebellion Climate Protesters Paralyze London

Ronald Reagan said, “Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.” These delusional climate protestors are proving the point by demanding the policies that will lead to their own extinction. ⁃ TN Editor

Thousands of people took to the streets of central London on Monday, blockading some of the UK capital’s busiest roads and bridges, and gluing themselves to street furniture, to raise the alarm over a mounting climate crisis.

On Monday morning, a group of demonstrators with trees, plants and solar panels in tow barricaded Waterloo Bridge, one of five locations being targeted by environmental campaigners in the city as part of the protest, which is expected to continue for at least a week.

The demonstrations are part of a global campaign, orchestrated by British climate organization Extinction Rebellion, which includes rallies in at least 80 cities across more than 33 countries, demanding governments “take decisive action on the climate and ecological emergency.”

he group, which is supported by a slew of academics, scientists and celebrities, including the former Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams and American actor Willem Dafoe, claims that more than 3,000 people will take part in protests in the city.

Extinction Rebellion, which launched late last year with climate protests that shut down five London bridges, made headlines earlier this month when members of the group disrupted a Brexit debate in Parliament with a nude demonstration.

Protesters were expected to use tactics including gluing or locking themselves to gates, benches, turnstiles and other street furniture to bring intersections and streets to a standstill on Monday.

Photos and videos shared on social media showed some protesters outside London’s Shell Centre near Waterloo Bridge on Monday. While some demonstrators glued themselves to the revolving front door, others scrawled Extinction Rebellion’s hourglass symbol in graffiti and smeared black paint on the exterior of the building. The protesters also smashed a glass door.

A Shell spokesman told CNN: “We respect the right of everyone to express their point of view, we ask only that they do so with their safety and the safety of others in mind.”

London’s Metropolitan Police said in a statement that policing plans were in place to support public order during Extinction Rebellion demonstrations over the coming weeks, and advised those traveling in the capital to allow for extra journey time.

Among the group’s demands is that governments reduce carbon emissions to zero by 2025 and create citizens’ assemblies to devise an emergency plan of action on climate and ecological justice.

‘Force the government to tell the truth’

Anna Burton, from Lancashire in northwest England, said she came to Marble Arch on the corner of London’s Hyde Park to call on big businesses to go carbon neutral and demand a better ecological future for her children.

“I’ve come to force the government to tell the truth about climate change, the extent of the damage … it’s about priorities: fossil fuel industries, the banks, the businesses, everybody — it’s not in everyone’s interest to go carbon neutral,” Burton told CNN.

“I’m here for my children, I’ve lived my life but I want them to live a normal life, and they might not have a chance to.”

Half a mile away, on Oxford Street, demonstrators had gathered at one of the city’s main thoroughfares for a sit-in.

Some protesters dressed in yellow paper crowns were lying in the street in a “die-in,” their arms linked through tubes. Nearby, others stood atop a pink painted sailboat emblazoned with the message, “Tell the truth,” with a flag bearing the group’s logo.

Read full story here…




global warming

Scientists Prove Man-Made Global Warming Is A Hoax

There are many journalists and scientists today who are writing about the fraudulent nature of global warming dogma, citing verified scientific studies. Nevertheless, the warmist hysteria continues to grow, exhibiting symptoms cult-like behavior. ⁃ TN Editor

The far-left ThinkProgress reports that scientists have finally proven that the theory of man-made Global Warming is a total hoax.
Of course, no one will admit it, but that is exactly what has happened.

A new scientific study shows has revealed the following:

Current CO2 levels of 410 parts per million (ppm) were last seen on Earth three million years ago, according to the most detailed reconstruction of the Earth’s climate by researchers at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) and published in Science Advances.

Yes, you read that correctly, three million — million — years ago CO2 levels on Earth were the same as they are today, but there is one major difference between three million years ago and today…

Three million years ago, we humans were not driving cars or eating the meat that requires cow farts; we weren’t barbecuing or refusing to recycle or building factories; there was no Industrial Age, no plastic, no air conditioning, no electricity, no lumber mills, no consumerism, no aerosols.

In fact, three million years ago, there were probably no human beings on Earth, at least not human in the way we use that term today. And yet…

CO2 levels were the same then as they are now…

Hmmm…?

But I thought humans warmed the planet? That’s the hustle we’ve been sold for three decades now — you know, that WE are the problem.

We have also been told the problem is DEFINITELY NOT a billions-year-old planet running through cycles where the temperature might fluctuate a bit. Oh, no, that could never be it — so stop saying that could be, you Denier.

Well, what about the Ice Age that occurred thousands and thousands of years before the Industrial Age.

Shut up, Denier.

And yet…

According to the study, scientists also discovered that during this period of Global Warming “there were no ice sheets covering either Greenland or West Antarctica, and much of the East Antarctic ice sheet was gone.”

How is this possible 2,999,971 years before Arnold Schwarzenegger bought his Hummer?

It gets worse:

Temperatures were up to 7 degrees Fahrenheit warmer globally, at least double that at the poles, and sea levels were some 20 meters (65 feet) higher.

How is that possible 2,999,945 years before Americans moved to the suburbs and lit up the charcoal grills?

Read full story here…