Fauci

Fauci Sets Stage For Mandatory Vaccines

Don’t think for a minute that governments ladened with big pharma lobbyists and policy makers will not demand mandatory vaccination for every human on earth, because they are already laying the groundwork for it. The primary top-down driver will be the UN’s WHO.

Furthermore, look for a global tracking system on who has been vaccinated and who has not. This will eventually include your entire health records and will be used to limit your activities with the rest of society. ⁃ TN Editor

Anthony Fauci, America’s most-listened-to medical professional on the coronavirus, and apparently on all the political, economic, cultural and social precautions every man, woman and child in the nation should take on the coronavirus, has just warned what cooler-head coronavirus watchers have suspected all along: that this country may never, no never, go back to normal.

Never, that is, Fauci suggested, until a vaccine is developed. And by logical extension, that’s to say — never, until a vaccine is developed that must then be included on the required list of shots for all children to attend school.

What great news for Big Pharma.

What great news for Bill Gates who just announced his foundation is going to spend billions of dollars to help build factories for seven possible coronavirus vaccine makers. “Spend” is probably the wrong word here. Invest is more like it.

After all, Gates, first and foremost, is a businessman. A billionaire businessman who made his billions in Microsoft and who just left his billion-dollar Microsoft enterprise to pursue other matters — specifically, to “serve humanity,” is how the Economic Times put it, in a March headline.

For a taste of how he’s already served humanity, one need only look to the disastrous Common Core one-size-fits-all, top-down education plan that his foundation bankrolled.

From education to vaccinations — the service to humanity never ends.

But this is what Fauci just warned, at a White House briefing with reporters: “When we get back to normal, we will go back to the point where we can function as a society. But … [i]f you want to get back to pre-coronavirus, that might not ever happen in the sense that the threat is there. But I believe that with the therapies that will be coming online, and the fact that I feel confident that over a period of time we will get a good vaccine, that we will never have to get back to where we are right now.”

He also said this: “If back to normal means acting like there never was a coronavirus problem, I don’t think that’s going to happen until we do have a situation where you can completely protect the population.”

This — as the dire, dark, deathly numbers that sent America into coronavirus panic in the first place were just revised downward.

“America’s most influential coronavirus model just revised its estimates downward,” The Washington Post reported.

This — as Gates, the guy who has been the face of warning about the “nightmare scenario” of the coronavirus outbreak, just said the predicted death toll may not be as high as, well, predicted. Yes, viruses are, after all, seasonal.

This — as deaths due to the coronavirus are wildly open to interpretation, wildly speculative, wildly unscientific.

Read full story here…




empty hospital room

COVID-19 Computer Models Continue To Deteriorate

Reminiscent of erroneous global warming computer models, those created by overzealous Technocrats for COVID-19 have proven to be just as bad, but because they are ‘scientists’, they will not be held accountable for their folly. ⁃ TN Editor

The number of people hospitalized across the United States as a result of the novel coronavirus illness (COVID-19) is reportedly only a fraction of what some health experts projected a few days ago.

On Monday, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo told reporters that in his state alone, the epicenter of the viral outbreak in the United States, new coronavirus hospitalizations dropped by about 75 percent, from 1,427 four days ago to 358 on Sunday.

Highlighting the drop in new hospitalizations in NY, the state hardest hit (131,239 cases; 4,758 deaths as of Monday) by the coronavirus, Alex Berenson, former New York Times reporter who has been following the U.S. outbreak closely, observed on Twitter on Monday: “It’s over, guys. It’s already over.”

Jim Malatras, an aide for Gov. Cuomo, reportedly indicated that projections are now showing that New York is unlikely to need 110,000 hospital beds, as previously thought.

The new forecasts show “a much lower demand” that stands in the estimated 20,000-30,000 range, Jesse McKinley, the New York Times bureau chief in the NY capital of Albany, wrote on Twitter on Monday.

That means the new projections for the number of hospital beds needed in NY are between about 70 and 80 percent lower than initially estimated.

On Monday, Gov. Cuomo acknowledged that the drop in hospitalizations in combination with other signs, like the fatalities remaining flat for the second day in a row and a drop in intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, suggest a “possible flattening of the curve.”

Citing the figures contained in the White House-touted models created by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington, the Epoch Times noted on Sunday:

While tens of thousands are hospitalized across the United States due to COVID-19, the numbers are a fraction of what experts predicted just a few days ago. The main reason appears to be that the [IHME] projections were already off the day they were released.

Given that states with available data had a current hospitalization rate around 6 to 20 percent, if each of the no-data states had a rate of 20 percent, the hospitalizations for the whole country would add up to some 47,000 as of April 3 to 4.

The IHME model expected about 114,000 to 181,000 hospital beds would be needed nationwide on April 3, and roughly 120,000 to 430,000 on April 16.

That means the number of hospitalizations across the United States earlier this month was much less (at most about 40 percent of the forecasted figure) than the number predicted by the IHME model.

Amid the ongoing pandemic, health officials are relying on computer modeling that takes known data and makes predictions to inform and drive the decisions of private businesses and governments across the world.

Statistical models attempting to predict the impact of the Chinese coronavirus, including the ones created by IHME, rely, at least in part, on polluted data from the Chinese Communist Party, Breitbart News confirmed last Friday.

Read full story here…




Imperial College

Imperial College Clearly Linked To US Pandemic Response

My recent article, The Common Roots Of Climate Change And COVID-19 Hysteria is again proven correct that the U.S policy has been unduly influenced by Imperial College and its lead statistician, Neil Ferguson, PhD.

Considering that Imperial College is a leading social activist with a well-known agenda for climate change hysteria and Sustainable Development, it has no business whatever in American politics. Imperial’s true historical agenda follows the United Nations in perfect harmony: destroy Capitalism and Free Enterprise in order to usher in the UN’s Sustainable Development, aka Technocracy.

In other words, this entire debacle, originally “spooked” by Imperial, the World Health Organization and the United Nations, is not about COVID-19 at all.

Oh world, you had better wake up to send these carpet baggers packing lest you fall into George Orwell’s vision of the future: “imagine a boot stamping on a human face – forever.  ⁃ TN Editor

Leading disease forecasters, whose research the White House used to conclude that 100,000 to 240,000 people will die nationwide from the coronavirus, were mystified when they saw the administration’s projection this week.

The experts said they don’t challenge the numbers’ validity but said they don’t know how the White House arrived at them.

White House officials have refused to explain how they generated the figure – a death toll bigger than the United States suffered in the Vietnam War or the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. They have not provided the underlying data so others can assess its reliability, and have not provided long-term strategies to lower that death count.

Some of President Trump’s top advisers have expressed doubts about the estimate, according to three White House officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly. There have been fierce debates inside the White House about its accuracy.

At a task force meeting this week, according to two officials with direct knowledge of it, Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, told others that there are too many variables at play in the pandemic to make the models reliable: “I’ve looked at all the models. I’ve spent a lot of time on the models. They don’t tell you anything. You can’t really rely upon models.”

Robert Redfield, director of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the vice president’s office have similarly voiced doubts about the projections’ accuracy, the three officials said.

Jeffrey Shaman, a Columbia University epidemiologist whose models were cited by the White House, said his own work on the pandemic doesn’t go far enough into the future to make predictions akin to the White House fatality forecast.

“We don’t have a sense of what’s going on in the here and now, and we don’t know what people will do in the future,” he said. “We don’t know if the virus is seasonal.”

The estimate appeared to be a rushed affair, said Marc Lipsitch, an epidemiologist and the director of Harvard University’s Center for Communicable Disease Dynamics. “They contacted us, I think, on a Tuesday a week ago, and asked for answers and feedback by Thursday, basically 24 hours,” he said. “My initial response was we can’t do it that fast. But we ended up providing them some numbers responding to very specific scenarios.”

Other experts noted that the White House didn’t even explain the time period the death estimate supposedly captures – just the coming few months, or the year-plus it will take to deploy a vaccine.

Almost the entirety of what the public knows about the death projection was presented on a single slide at a briefing Tuesday from the White House coronavirus task force. A White House representative said the task force has not publicly released the models from which it drew, out of respect for the confidentiality of the modelers, many of whom approached the White House unsolicited and simply want to continue their work without publicity.

A representative for Fauci did not respond to a request for comment. A spokeswoman for Vice President Mike Pence declined to comment. On a Thursday call with conservative leaders, Pence said that it was “difficult” to view the models but that “the president thought it was important to share with the American people.”

Among epidemiologists, the estimate raised more questions than it answered – not just about methodology and accuracy but, perhaps more importantly, about purpose.

The primary goal of such models amid an outbreak is to allow authorities to game out scenarios, foresee challenges and create a coherent, long-term strategy – something some experts worry doesn’t exist within the White House.

“I wish there were more of a concerted national plan. I wish it had started a month and a half ago, maybe two months ago,” Shaman said.

Natalie Dean, a biostatistician who was not involved in the White House effort but is working on coronavirus vaccine evaluation with the World Health Organization, pointed out that “the whole reason you create models is to help you make decisions. But you have to actually act on those projections and answers. Otherwise, the models are useless.”

At Tuesday’s briefing, Trump announced the government’s projected death count, saying it was based on data “that has been, I think, brilliantly put together.”

The coordinator of Trump’s coronavirus task force, Deborah Birx, then projected a slide with a high-arcing mountain showing the worst-case scenario: 1.5 million to 2.2 million deaths if Americans and the government did absolutely nothing to stop the virus. And a smaller – but still imposing – hill with 100,000 to 240,000 deaths if measures such as social distancing are taken.

Birx said the projection was based on five or six modelers, including from Imperial College in Britain and Harvard, Columbia and Northeastern universities. “It was their models that created the ability to see what these mitigations could do, how steeply they could depress the curve,” Birx said, referring to the trend line on a graph depicting infection counts.

But two models appeared to have been particularly influential: the one by Imperial College and one from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at University of Washington (IHME).

At a news briefing Sunday, Birx explained the process this way: Her task force initially reviewed the work of 12 models. “Then we went back to the drawing board over the last week or two, and worked from the ground up, utilizing actual reporting of cases,” Birx said. “It’s the way we built the HIV model, the TB model, the malaria model. And when we finished, the other group that was working in parallel – which we didn’t know about,” referring to the IHME group.

The IHME model initially that estimated deaths through this summer would total 38,000 to 162,000 – a lower projection than many others and beneath the White House’s own estimate. But because of its lower figure and Birx’s comments, experts believe it to be a main source for the White House’s best-case scenario of 100,000 to 240,000 deaths.

Meanwhile, the White House appeared to rely on Imperial College for its worst-case scenario. That study estimated as many as 2.2 million US deaths if no action were taken, 1.1 million deaths if moderate mitigation strategies were adopted, and an unspecified number if drastic measures were taken.

(TN Note: emphasis added)

Read full story here…




UK To Release ‘Contact Tracking’ App To Detect Nearby Virus Carriers

This is comparable to China’s Social Credit Score app except that the red flag depends on who is sick or not. This is a new twist in social distancing and will result in rampant social shunning. ⁃ TN Editor

The government is preparing to release an app which alerts people if they come too close to someone who has tested positive for COVID-19, Sky News can reveal.

The contact tracking app, which will operate on an opt-in basis, will be released either just before or just after the lockdown is lifted, according to several people with close knowledge of the project.

NHS bosses hope the app will attract more than 50% of the population, as large numbers of people using it together will be necessary for it to work effectively.

The existence of the app, which was first revealed by Health Service Journal, has been known some time, but key technical details have only recently been agreed by NHSX, the NHS England innovation unit leading the project.

The app will detect other phones in close vicinity using short-range Bluetooth signals, then store a record of those contacts on the device, the sources say.

If someone tests positive for COVID-19, they will be able to upload those contacts, who can then be alerted – after a suitable delay, to avoid accidentally identifying an individual – via the app.

This method means data is not sent regularly to a central authority, potentially easing concerns around privacy, which NHSX fears may slow adoption of the app.

NHSX plans to appoint an Ethics Board to oversee the project, with board members to be identified over the coming weeks.

However, privacy campaigners and data protection advocates questioned whether any board of this kind would be independent, and raised concerns about the app’s safeguards.

Last week, a group of “responsible technologists” published an open letter to the CEO of NHSX and the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care warning that “location and contact tracking technology could be used as a means of social control”.

Sky News understands this letter was published in response to the early phase of the development of the app, which was originally intended to be used during the “containment” phase of the government’s response to the pandemic.

One source who witnessed work on the app during this period described it as a “hot mess” run by “a hodge-podge of suppliers and contractors” with “no clear voices in the room speaking to the privacy implications of the technology they were using.”

Another said: “The initial brief was to take what was going on around the world and say, ‘What is the British version of that?’ But it didn’t really feel like that was happening.”

Read full story here…




A Non-Technocrat Method To Fight Coronavirus

TN has stated repeatedly that not all scientists and engineers are Technocrats. Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai holds four degrees from MIT plus a PhD in Biological Engineering and yet seeks to use his knowledge to serve mankind rather than to control it. ⁃ TN Editor

States and cities are shutting down businesses, closing schools, prohibiting crowds, imposing curfews—all to contain the spread of coronavirus.

The draconian measures are a major subversion of Americans’ constitutional liberties, yet proponents of such policies claim they are a necessary evil to prevent this latest pandemic from causing mass fatalities. The disastrous effect on our economy, they say, is to be preferred to the deaths of millions.

But what if we didn’t have to choose one or the other? What if protecting American lives and preserving our freedom and economic stability weren’t mutually exclusive?

Sound too good to be true? Not according to Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai.

In a letter to President Trump, Dr. Ayyadurai, a world-renowned systems scientist and pioneer in the field of systems biology, outlined a solution to the current crisis that he said would restore the immune health of the American people without jeopardizing the nation’s economic health.

Ayyadurai holds four degrees from MIT, to which he returned in 2003 to complete doctoral work within the Department of Biological Engineering—work that led him to develop CytoSolve, a “scalable computational platform for modeling the cell by dynamic integration of molecular pathways models.”

In his letter to the president, Dr. Ayyadurai rejects the response model pushed by Dr. Anthony Fauci, who serves as director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and is seen as the guiding force behind the Trump administration’s coronavirus policy.

“The current trajectory of Dr. Fauci’s public ‘health’ policy will result in the short-and long-term destruction of citizens’ immune health as well as our nation’s economic health,” Dr. Ayyadurai asserts. “Dr. Fauci’s policy, at best, is based on a 1950s outdated ‘one-size-fits-all,’ non-personalized approach to medicine and public health; and at worst, is derived from a ‘fake science’ understanding of the immune system … .”

Dr. Ayyadurai argues that “[t]here is no need to shut down our entire country. There is no need to quarantine all of our citizens. The solution herein provides a path to advance the immune health of all our citizens while getting our healthy people back to work — now.”

The MIT-grad lays the foundation for his proposal by explaining that, contrary to the common misconception, it is not the virus — coronavirus or otherwise — that harms individuals, but a person’s own faulty immune system.

The modern science of the immune system informs us that it is the over reaction [sic] of our OWN weakened and dysfunctional immune system attacking tissues and cells of our own body that harms and kills, versus the virus — be it COVID-19 or any other virus…. In healthy individuals, the immune system processes pathogens with a natural immune response that is mild and non-lethal; however, in those who are immune-compromised — elderly and those with pre-existing conditions—their own immune systems may overreact; and in the case of COVID-19, attacking lung epithelial cells and tissues leading to hospitalization and mortality.

It is commonly acknowledged that even though all Americans are being asked to self-quarantine and refrain from their regular business, coronavirus generally provokes serious symptoms in the elderly and those who have weakened immune systems due to conditions like heart disease, diabetes, or obesity.

Healthy adults are usually either asymptomatic or at most experience a brief fever and flu-like symptoms, while cases of affliction in children are rare.

Dr. Ayyadurai holds that because most Americans will not be severely impacted by the virus, it is not necessary to quarantine everyone. And because the risk is the result of a weakened immune system, the key is to strengthen people’s immunity.

He then goes on to outline “the solution that can lead America back to health—immune and economic:”

Read full story here…




Vaccine

Power Grab: The National Plan To Vaccinate Every American

The proper role of science is to advise government but not to be government. As this critical and fully sourced report reveals, the vaccine industry has totally usurped and compromised the role of government in order to promote its own business of selling vaccines.

Further, this is the heartbeat of Technocracy and social engineering. In the 1930s, the Technocracy Study Course stated,

Among the Service Sequences are education (this would embrace the complete training of the younger generation), and public health (medicine, dentistry, public hygiene, and all hospitals and pharmaceutical plants as well as institutions for defectives).

Decisions were not to be left to the individual, but to the self-appointed Technocrats who believed that only science could determine what is best for society. This group/herd management ideology is fully showcased by modern Technocrats.

Yes, they actually had a program to institutionalize ‘defectives’ who could not be brought into compliance with public health standards. ⁃ TN Editor

Scientists at the National Institutes of Health are working with a biotech company to quickly start clinical trials of an experimental messenger RNA vaccine and fast track it to licensure. 1 The FDA has not yet licensed messenger RNA vaccines that use part of the RNA of a virus to manipulate the body’s immune system into stimulating a potent immune response. 2 3  It looks like the coronavirus vaccine will be the first genetically engineered messenger RNA vaccine to be fast tracked to licensure, just like Gardasil was the first genetically engineered virus-like particle vaccine to be fast tracked to licensure. 4 5

There likely will be lots of questions about whether the fast tracked coronavirus vaccine was studied long enough to adequately demonstrate safety, especially for people who have trouble resolving strong inflammatory responses in their bodies and may be at greater risk for vaccine reactions.6 7 8 9 10 However, there is no question about what will happen if the Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) 11 12 recommends that all Americans get the newly licensed coronavirus vaccine.

The government has a National Vaccine Plan. It is a Plan designed to make sure you, your child and everyone in America gets every dose of every vaccine that government officials recommend now and in the future.

1986-1996: Establishing & Creating The Plan

Established under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act during the Reagan Administration, 13 the Plan didn’t really get traction until Congress funded the Vaccines for Children program in 1993 under the Clinton Administration 14 15 and gave the Department of Health and Human Services authority to fund a network of state-based electronic vaccine tracking registries 16 that can monitor the vaccination histories of children without the informed consent of their parents.

In 1995, then Secretary of Health Donna Shalala used rule-making authority to authorize the Social Security Administration to disclose the social security number of every baby born in the country to state governments without parental consent.17 Federal officials explained that – quote – “public health program uses of the social security numbers would include, but are not limited to, establishing immunization registries” and that new routine use of social security numbers would help the government operate “a national network of coordinated statewide immunization registries.” 18

By 1996, when Congress established a national Electronic Health Records (EHR) system under HIPPA, 19 the stage had been set for a government-operated electronic surveillance system to monitor the personal medical records and vaccination status of all Americans. 20 21  22 23  The justification for this big data grab by the government, which clearly violated the privacy of Americans, was to- quote – “protect the public by reducing disease.”

Nationwide Electronic Health Records & Vaccine Tracking Systems

Today, the nationwide federally funded Electronic Health Records system captures the details of every visit you make to a doctor’s office, hospital, pharmacy, laboratory or other medical facility; every medical diagnosis you get; every drug you have been prescribed and every vaccine you accept or refuse.   Your Electronic Health Record can be accessed not only by government health agencies like the Social Security Administration, Medicaid and federal and state health and law enforcement agencies, 24 25 but also can be shared with authorized third parties such as doctors, health insurance companies, HMOs and other corporations, hospitals, labs, nursing homes and medical researchers. 26 27 28

A new Health Information Exchange 29 30 31 initiative funded by the government will make it even easier for computerized health and vaccine records databases to tag, track down and sanction Americans who do not go along with the National Vaccine Plan in the future.  32 33 34 35 36 37 38

What Happened to the Plan’s Duty to Prevent Adverse Reactions to Vaccines?

Ironically, when Congress directed the Department of Health and Human Services to create a National Vaccine Program in the 1986 Act, federal health officials were told to put together a Plan to – quote – “achieve optimal prevention of human infectious diseases through immunization and to achieve optimal prevention against adverse reactions to vaccines.” 39  The Plan was not supposed to focus solely on vaccine development and promotion but to equally focus on preventing vaccine reactions.

Yet, in the very first 1994 National Vaccine Plan only four out of 25 “objectives” and only two out of 14 anticipated “outcomes” addressed preventing vaccine reactions. 40 The 2010 version of the Plan 41 also largely ignored the legal duty of HHS to conduct vaccine safety research to fill in long standing knowledge gaps and take steps to make vaccines and vaccine policies less likely to cause harm. 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52

Looking back, it appears Congress was not really committed to funding research and creating substantive initiatives to reduce vaccine risks, regardless of what was stated in the 1986 Act, or there would been congressional oversight and federal agencies would have been directed to follow the law rather than ignore it for more than 30 years. 53

Government’s Vaccine Marketing Plan for the Pharmaceutical Industry

Instead, government agencies have brazenly forged lucrative public private business partnerships with the pharmaceutical industry and the medical establishment to:

  • develop many new vaccines; 54 55 56 57
  • increase public demand for vaccines; 58
  • raise vaccination rates among children to nearly 100 percent; 59
  • create and expand electronic vaccine tracking registries; 60 61 62 63 64 and
  • promote global vaccination programs, 65 66 even though the primary purpose of the 1986 Act was to reduce vaccine reactions and protect the U.S. childhood vaccine supply, 67 not fund and expand global vaccination programs.

In fact, federal health officials accurately characterize the U.S. vaccination system in the 21st century as a business. A decade ago they admitted that – quote -“The 2010 National Vaccine Plan provides a vision for the U.S. vaccine and immunization enterprise for the next decade.” 68 That’s because they know the National Vaccine Plan is really a Vaccine Marketing Plan for the pharmaceutical industry. 69 70 71 72

So, if you are wondering why many states are trying to pass laws eliminating all vaccine exemptions and mandate every vaccine the pharmaceutical industry produces and the CDC recommends, 73 74 75 76 you don’t have to look any further than the government’s well-financed National Vaccine Plan.

Implementation of The Plan Accelerated in 2011

Implementation of the Plan was accelerated in 2011 after the U.S. Supreme Court declared FDA licensed vaccines to be –quote – “unavoidably unsafe” for the purpose of removing almost all remaining liability from drug companies when vaccines hurt people. 77 78

Since 2011, two powerful CDC-appointed vaccine advisory committees influenced by members associated with the pharmaceutical and medical trade industries – the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) 79 80 81 82 83 and the National Vaccine Advisory Committee (NVAC) 84 85 86 – have been busy coming up with new ways to meet strategic goals of the National Vaccine Plan.

When highly publicized cases of measles were reported in California’s Disneyland in 2015 87 and in New York in 2019, 88 89 with military precision pursuit of the Plan was kicked into even high gear. 90 91

During the past five years, California, Vermont, New York, Maine and Hawaii have lost vaccine exemptions, even though tens of thousands of Americans rose up in protest. 92 In 2019, the people managed to hold on to exemptions in states like Oregon, Arizona and New Jersey 93 but this year, bills to force vaccine use are already threatening parental, civil and human rights in Virginia, Massachusetts, Florida, Washington, Pennsylvania and more. 94

Five Main Types of Vaccine Laws Being Proposed in States

These are the five main types of laws being proposed in the states and your state may be one of them:

Number One:  State laws that eliminate all personal belief vaccine exemptions allowing you to follow your conscience or religious beliefs and make it illegal for physicians to grant a medical exemption unless it strictly conforms to very narrow CDC-approved contraindications to vaccination.

National vaccine coverage rates among school children are at 95 percent for core vaccines like polio, pertussis, measles and chickenpox, yet, government health officials are not satisfied. 95 They have narrowed vaccine contraindications so that almost no medical history or health condition qualifies as a reason for a medical exemption. 96

If you or your child have had previous vaccine reactions, are vaccine injured, have a brother or sister who was injured or died after vaccination, or are suffering with a brain or immune system disorder that the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) does not consider to be a contraindication to vaccination, states like California 97 98 are denying physicians the right to exercise professional judgment and give children a medical exemption to vaccination are threatening human rights. 99

No wonder less than one percent of vaccine reactions are ever reported to the federal Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System 100 and doctors feel free to discriminate against and deny medical care to anyone who is not vaccinated according to CDC schedules. 101

Laws that eliminate medical, religious and conscience exemptions to vaccination and ban citizens from getting a school education – even a college education – do violate civil and human rights and so do vaccine mandates by employers who fire or refuse to hire workers based on their vaccination status. 102 103 104   The two professions being targeted first for workplace vaccine mandates are healthcare 105 106 107 and childcare workers, 108 109 but they certainly will not be the last. 110

Number Two:  State laws that turn unelected members of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices into de facto lawmakers and automatically mandate all current and future federally recommended vaccines without any public discussion or vote by duly elected state legislators.

Under the U.S. Constitution, state legislatures hold the majority of power to pass public health laws, so vaccine laws are state laws. 111 112  If states hand that constitutional authority over to an unelected federal government committee, the people no longer can work through their elected state representatives to make sure laws do not force involuntary medical risk taking and punish citizens exercising civil and human rights. 113

It is clear that Pharma and medical trade lobbyists partnering with government officials to implement the National Vaccine Plan are unhappy they have to spend so much time and money trying to strong arm state legislators into mandating every CDC recommended vaccine. At the same time, some politicians are not happy that a growing number of Americans are showing up in state Capitols to oppose oppressive vaccine mandates.

Today, it costs a staggering $3,000 to give a child every one of the 69 doses of 16 vaccines on the federal government’s schedule. 114  In addition to coronavirus vaccine, there are more than a dozen experimental vaccines being fast tracked to market for TB, influenza, HIV/AIDS, gonorrhea, herpes simplex, strep A and B, e-coli, RSV, salmonella, and malaria, 115 with several hundred more being developed in a global vaccine market estimated to balloon to nearly $100 billion by 2026. 116 117

State laws that automatically mandate all federally recommended vaccines are handing Big Pharma a big blank check and putting an unknown number of vaccine vulnerable children and adults at risk for serious health problems if they are forced to use every one of them. 118 119 120 121 122

Number ThreeState laws that allow doctors to declare minor children mentally competent to consent to vaccination so children can be vaccinated without the knowledge of their parents.

There is plenty of scientific evidence that children’s brains are not developed enough before or during teenage years to support rational benefit and risk decision-making, especially if they are subjected to pressure. 123 124 Giving doctors the legal authority to, in effect, go behind parents’ backs and persuade a minor child to get liability free vaccines violates the legal right of parents to consent to medical interventions performed on their children. 125 It also puts vaccine vulnerable children at greater risk for suffering reactions. 126

Parents know their child’s personal and family medical history best and if parents are left in the dark, not only are they blocked from preventing vaccine reactions but there is no way for them to monitor a child after vaccination for signs of reactions so they can immediately take their child for treatment. 127

Number FourState laws requiring schools to publicly post vaccine coverage rates for the purpose of shaming schools that allow students with vaccine exemptions to receive a school education.

Publicly posting school vaccination rates and numbers of students with exemptions creates a hostile community environment by targeting certain schools and families, whose children have vaccine exemptions, for discrimination and abuse. 128 129  130

It is an illusion that some schools are safer based on vaccination rates. For example, even schools with 100 percent vaccination rates and zero exemptions have had outbreaks of pertussis 131 and schools with very high vaccination rates have had outbreaks of measles and mumps. 132 133 That is because vaccinated children and adults can get infected with and transmit infectious diseases but sometimes show few or no symptoms and are never diagnosed or reported. 134 135 136 137 138 139 140

Children and teachers interact with many other vaccinated and unvaccinated people outside of the school setting. It is discriminatory to require public posting of the numbers of healthy students with vaccine exemptions, when schools are not required to publicly post the numbers of students who are infected with transmissible diseases like hepatitis B and C, HIV, streptococcal, mononucleosis, cytomegalovirus, e-coli, Fifths disease, herpes simplex and more.

Number FiveState laws that operate vaccine tracking registries and integrate them into Electronic Health Records systems without the consent of those being tracked.

The National Vaccine Information Center has a two-decade public record of opposing the creation of national or state based electronic surveillance systems that automatically enroll children and adults without their informed consent to monitor their vaccination status and health histories. 141

Not only have there been past security breaches with electronic databases dumping personally identifying information into the public domain, 142 but there is legitimate concern that the government should not be conducting electronic surveillance on citizens while pursuing a National Vaccine Plan that encourages punitive societal sanctions, such as the inability to get a school education or a job, for individuals who refuse to go along with the Plan.

Learn About Federal & State Government Police Powers to Compel Vaccine Use

For more information on the history and types of public health laws that allow the federal government and states to use police powers to compel vaccine use, go to NVIC’s website at NVIC.org143 144

To learn more about vaccine legislation pending in your state and talking points you can use to educate your legislators, go to NVIC Advocacy.org and become a user of NVIC’s free online Advocacy Portal. You will be put into direct contact with your own state and federal representatives and sent emails when bills that threaten or expand your freedom to make voluntary vaccine choices are moving in your state so you can make your voice heard, including showing up at scheduled public hearings.

Making Government Work for Us

In America, we are governed by laws that the representatives we elect make, so it is important to vet all candidates for positions on issues you care about before going to the polls. Good laws can be enacted and bad laws can be repealed but only if we wake up, stand up and actively participate to make our representative government work for us.

Already this year, there have been more than 50 good bills introduced in a number of states that defend voluntary vaccine choices. This is a time for positive action.

It’s your health. Your family. Your choice.

1 Terry M. Moderna’s Coronavirus Vaccine Ready for Clinical TrialsPharmaLive Feb. 25, 2020.

2 Zhang C, Maruggi G et al. Advances in mRNA Vaccines for Infectious Diseases. Front Immunol 2019; 19(594).

3 Precision Vaccinations. mRNA Vaccine Elicited Strong Immune Responses in the Presence of Maternal Antibodies. Jan. 9, 2020.

4 Roldao A, Mellado MCM et al. Virus-like particles in vaccine developmentExp Rev Vaccines 2010; 10: 1149-1176.

5  National Vaccine Information Center. Merck’s Gardasil Vaccine Not Proven Safe for Little Girls: NVIC Criticizes FDA for Fast Tracking LicensureNVIC Press Release June 27, 2006.

6 Institute of Medicine Committee to Review Adverse Effects of Vaccines. Evaluation of Biologic Mechanisms of Adverse Effects: Increased Susceptibility. Chapter 3 (p. 82). Washington, D.C. The National Academies Press 2012.

7 Shanmugam MK, Sethi G. Role of Epigenetics in Inflammation-Associated Diseases. In: Epigenetics: Development and Disease. Subcellular Biochemistry (Vol.1) pp. 627-657. Springer 2013.

8 McGarvey PB, Suzek BE, Baraniuk JN et al. In ilico analysis of autoimmune diseases and genetic relationship to vaccination against infectious diseases. BMC Immunol 2014; 15: 6.

9 Fisher BL. Mast Cell Disease and Vaccination: Is There Increased Risk? The Vaccine Reaction July 24, 2018.

10 Mazzone R, Zwergel C et al. The emerging role of epigenetics in human autoimmune disordersClinical Epigenetics 2019; 11(34).

11 U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC). Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).

12 Smith JC. The structure, role and procedures of the U.S. Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Vaccine 2010; 28(1).

13 Public Law 99-660. Title III – National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. 42 USC 300aa. Nov. 14, 1986.

14 CDC. Vaccines for Children Program. Feb. 28, 2016.

15  Robinson CA, Sepe SJ, Lin KF. The president’s child immunization initiative – a summary of the problem and the responsePublic Health Rep 1993; 108(4): 419-425.

16 Wood D, Saarlas KW et al. Immunization Registries in the United States: Implications for the Practice of Public Health in a Changing Health Care System.  Annu Rev Public Health 20: 231-255.

17 Social Security Administration. Disclosure and Verification of Social Security Numbers (SSN) Without Consent: Verification of SSN to Federal, State and Local Agencies. SSA Program Operations Manual System (POMS) July 9, 2008.

18 Fisher BL. Public Comment to DHHS Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation on behalf of NVIC on Proposed Standards for Privacy of Individually Indentifiable Health Information: Social Security Numbers Appropriated to Tag, Track and Tell. Feb. 15, 2000.

19 CDC. HIPPA and Access to Patient Records During IQIP and VFC Visits: Can patient records be reviewed by health department staff, or their contractual agents, such as the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and Visiting Nurses Association (VNA) for the purpose of conducting IQIP visits? Can health care providers, daycare operators, Head Start and school officials share immunization information with another provider or school to update missing immunization history or bring children in compliance with daycare, Head Start and school requirements? Can patient identifiers, including name and birthdate, be collected and stored electronically, incidental to IQIP and VFC visits? Sept. 30, 2016.

20 U.S. Congress. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA). Passed by Congress Aug. 2, 1996; Signed by President Clinton into law Aug. 21, 1996.

21 Fisher BL. History of Forced Vaccination: How The Plan To Force Vaccination Gave Birth To The National ID, A Government Health Records Database, and the End of Medical PrivacyNational Vaccine Information Center July 1999.

22 Burke T. The Health Information Technology Provisions in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009: Implications for Public Health Policy and PracticePublic Health Rep 2010; 125(1): 141-145.

23  Goldstein MM, Pewen WF. The HIPPA Omnibus Rule: Implications for Public Health Policy and Practice. Public Health Rep 2013; 128(6): 554-558.

24 Electronic Frontier Foundation. Medical Privacy.

25 O’Connor J, Matthews G. Informational Privacy, Public Health and State LawsAm J Public Health 2011; 101(10): 1845-1850.

26 DHHS. Standards For Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE). July 6, 2001. And Summary of the HIPPA Privacy Rule.

27  American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). FAQ on Government Access to Medical Records (under the USA Patriot Act and the HIPPA regulations).

28 CDC. Electronic Health Records (EHRs) and Patient Work InformationNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Apr. 2, 2015.

29 Health Information Exchange (HIMSS). Interoperability and Health Information Exchange. https://www.himss.org/interoperability-and-health-information-exchange

30 Shapiro JS, Mostashari F et al. Using Health Information Exchange to Improve Public Health. Am J Public Health 2011; 101(4): 616-623.

31 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. HHS Proposes New Rules for Interoperability of Electronic Health Information. Press Release: Feb. 11, 2019.

32 Hinman AR, Ross DA. Immunization Registries Can Be Building Blocks for National Health Information SystemsHealth Affairs 2007; 29(4).

33 Daniel J, Coyle R, Chi A. Immunization Information Systems Help Track VaccinationsHealthITBuzz Aug. 27, 2014.

34 Parpia R. Doctors Incentivized by CDC to Increase Vaccination CoverageThe Vaccine Reaction Aug. 11, 2016.

35 Murthy N, Rodgers L et al. Progress in Childhood Vaccination Data in Immunization Information Systems – United States, 2013-2016MMWR 2017; 66(43): 1178-1181.

36 CDC. Immunization Information Systems (IIS). June 2, 2019.

37 CDC. 2018-2020 Immunization Information System (IIS) Strategic Plan. June 7, 2019.

38 CDC. Vaccine Tracking System (VTrcks). May 1, 2019.

39 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. 42 U.S.C. Part 1 – National Vaccine Program. Sec. 300aa-1-Establishment. Sec. 300aa-2-Program responsibilities. Sec. 300aa-3-Plan.

40 Institute of Medicine.  Appendix D: 1994 National Vaccine Plan Goals, Objectives and Anticipated Outcomes. In: Initial Guidance for an Update of the National Vaccine Plan: A Letter Report to the National Vaccine Program Office. National Academies Press 2008.

41 DHHS. U.S. National Vaccine Plan (2010). Office of Infectious Disease and HIV/AIDS Policy Oct. 3, 2019. National Vaccine Plan Development. Mar. 28, 2016.

42 Institute of Medicine Vaccine Safety Committee. Adverse Effects of Pertussis and Rubella Vaccines.  Afterword on Research Needs. (p. 206).   Washington, DC. The National Academies Press 1991.

43 Institute of Medicine Vaccine Safety Committee. Adverse Events Associated with Childhood Vaccines: Evidence Bearing on Causality. Executive Summary (p. 17). Need for Research and Surveillance. (pp. 305 & 307). Risk-Modifying Factors (p. 307). Washington, D.C. The National Academies Press 1994.

44 Institute of Medicine Committee to Study New Research on Vaccines. DPT Vaccine and Chronic Nervous System Dysfunction: A New Analysis. Conclusion (p. 15). Washington, D.C. The National Academy Press 1994.

45 Fisher, BL. Vaccine Safety Research Needs: Perspective from ParentsInstitute of Medicine Vaccine Safety Forum Public Workshop Apr. 1, 1996.

46 Institute of Medicine Vaccine Safety Forum. Howe CJ, Johnston RB, Fenichel GM, Editors. Summaries of Two Workshops. Washington, D.C. The National Academy Press 1997.

47 Fisher BL. Presentation on vaccine safety research needs to Institute of Medicine Immunization Safety Review CommitteeNational Academy of Sciences Jan. 22, 2001.

48 Institute of Medicine Immunization Safety Review Committee. Hepatitis B Vaccine and Demyelinating Neurological Disorders. Recommendations for Public Health Response: Research, Surveillance, Basic and Clinical Science (pp. 10-12). Washington, D.C. National Academy Press 2002.

49 Institute of Medicine Immunization Safety Review Committee. Multiple Immunizations and Immune Dysfunction. Executive Summary: Under Review (p. 3). Biological Mechanisms (pp. 28-31).  Recommendations Regarding Public Health Response: Research (pp. 107-108); Basic and Clinical Science (pp. 108-109). National Academy Press 2002.

50 Institute of Medicine Immunization Safety Review Committee. Influenza Vaccines and Neurological Complications. Recommendation for Public Health Response: Research, Surveillance, Basic and Clinical Science (pp. 10-12). Washington, D.C. National Academy Press 2003.

51 Institute of Medicine Committee on the Review of the National Immunization Program’s Research Procedures and Data Sharing Program. Vaccine Safety Research, Data Access and Public Trust. Washington, D.C. The National Academies Press 2005.  Executive Summary: Independent Review of Vaccine Safety Datalink Activities. (p. 6).

52 Fisher BL. Vaccine Safety Research Priorities: Engaging the Public. Oral presentation. National Vaccine Advisory Committee Vaccine Safety Working Group Apr. 11, 2008.

53 NVIC. National Vaccine Information Center Calls 21st Century Cures Act “A Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing” and Urges Presidential Veto to Protect Public HealthBusiness Wire Dec. 8, 2016.

54 Ben-Menachem G, Ferguson SM, Balakrishnan K. Doing Business with NIHNat Biotechnol 2006; 24(1): 17-20.

55 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). National Institutes of Health (NIH) Research Funding Portfolio – Vaccine Related Projects. Apr. 19, 2019.

56 National Institutes of Health (NIH). Disease-Specific Vaccines ResearchNIAID July 1, 2019.

57 NIH. 2018 NIAID Strategic Plan for Research on Vaccine Adjuvants.

58 CDC. Immunization Strategies for Healthcare Practices and Providers: The Need for Strategies to Increase Immunization Levels. In: Epidemiology& Prevention of Vaccine Preventable Diseases. Public Health Foundation 2015.

59 CDC. Reminder Systems and Strategies for Increasing Childhood Vaccination Rates. July 18, 2018.

60 Cordero JF, Orenstein WA. The Future of Immunization Registries. In Supplement (Cordero JF, Guerra FA, Saarlas KN, Eds): Developing Immunization Registries: Experiences from the All Kids Count Program American Journal of Preventive Medicine 1997; 13(2): 1-128.

61 Fisher BL. The National Electronic Vaccine Tracking Registry: How the Plan to Force Vaccination Gave Birth To The National ID, A Government Health Records Database, and the End of Medical PrivacyNational Vaccine Information Center Summer 1999.

62 Fisher BL. Proposed Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information. Public Comment to HHS Feb. 15, 2000.

63 CDC. Initiative on Immunization Registries: Response to a Report from the National Vaccine Advisory CommitteeMMWR Oct. 5, 2001; 50(RR17): 1-17.

64 Wrangham T. Adults Targeted as Federal Government Prepares to Track the Unvaccinated. NVIC Newsletter Mar. 18, 2015.

65 National Vaccine Advisory Committee. Enhancing the Work of the Department of Health and Human Services National Vaccine Program in Global Immunization: Recommendations of the National Vaccine Advisory Committee. Public Health Rep 2014; 129 (Suppl 3): 12-85.

66 Fisher BL. WHO, Pharma, Gates & Government: Who’s Calling the Shots? NVIC Newsletter Jan. 27, 2019.

67 Public Law 99-660. Title III – National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. 42 USC 300aa. Nov. 14, 1986. Sec. 300aa -1. Establishment. Sec. 300aa-2. Program Responsibilities. Sec. 300aa-3. Plan. Sec. 300aa-5. National Vaccine Advisory Committee.

68 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). Executive Summary (pg. 9). U.S. National Vaccine Plan (2010). Oct. 3, 2019.

69 DHHS. U.S. National Vaccine Plan: Goal #1 – Develop New and Improved Vaccines. Office of Infectious Diseases and HIV/AIDS Policy June 24, 2016.

70 National Institutes of Health. Licensing Opportunities – VaccinesOffice of Technology Transfer 2019.

71 National Institutes of Health. Archives of Products Developed with Technologies from HHS Intramural Research Programs – HHS Licensed Products Approved by the FDA (Vaccines: Havrix, Rotashield, Lymerix, Twinrix, Gardasil, Cervarix). Office of Technology Transfer 2019.

72 The Vaccine Reaction. Drug Companies Pay FDA and NIH to Fast Track and Market Vaccines. Sept. 28, 2018.

73 NVIC Advocacy Team. State Vaccine Legislation in America 2015-2017.  NVIC Newsletter Oct. 25, 2017. State Vaccine Legislation in America 2018NVIC Newsletter Sept. 12, 2018.

74 National Vaccine Information Center. New York Bill Removing Religious Exemptions Turned Into Law on One Day with No Public HearingsThe Vaccine Reaction June 14, 2019.

75 NVIC Advocacy Team. Vaccine Exemptions Under Attack in 2019. Sept. 25, 2019.

76 NVIC Advocacy Portal. Vaccine-Related Bills Pending in States 2020 Legislative Session.

77 U.S. Supreme Court. Bruesewitz v. Wyeth 09-152; Feb. 22, 2011. Justices Sotomayor and Ginsberg Dissenting (pg. 30).

78 NVIC. National Vaccine Information Center Cites “Betrayal” of Consumers by U.S. Supreme Court Giving Total Liability Shield to Big PharmaNVIC Press Release Feb. 23, 2011.

79 CDC. Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).

80 U.S. House of Representatives. Conflicts of Interest in Vaccine Policy MakingCommittee on Government Reform Majority Staff Report June 15, 2000.

81 Benjamin M. The Vaccine Conflict. UPI July 21, 2003.

82 Smith JC. The structure, role and procedures of the U.S. Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Vaccine 2010; 28(1).

83 CDC. Conflict of Interests when Participating as a Member. Pg. 14. Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices Policies and Procedures December 2018.

84 DHHS. National Vaccine Advisory Committee. Office of Infectious Disease and HIV/AIDS Policy May 23, 2028. NVAC Charter.

85 National Vaccine Advisory Committee. Recommendations from the National Vaccine Advisory Committee: Standards for Adult Immunization PracticePublic Health Rep 2014; 129(2): 15-123.

86 National Vaccine Advisory Committee. Strengthening the Effectiveness of National, State and Local Efforts to Improve HPV Vaccination Coverage in the United States: Recommendations of the National Vaccine Advisory.Committee. Public Health Rep 2016; 133(5): 545-550.

87 Fisher BL. Measles in Disneyland: Third MMR Shot and Vaccine Exemption Ban? NVIC Newsletter Jan. 28, 2015.

88 CBS News. Measles outbreak fueled by anti-vaccination movement, infectious disease expert says. Jan. 30, 2019.

89 Ricks D. DeBlasio declares measles health emergency for parts of New York City. Apr. 9, 2019.

90 Fisher BL. Taking No Prisoners in the Vaccine Culture WarNVIC Newsletter Mar. 13, 2020.

91 Fisher BL. What Is Going on with Measles? The Science and Politics of Eradicating MeaslesNVIC Newsletter May 25, 2019.

92 Fisher BL. Freedom to Dissent and the New Blacklist in AmericaNVIC Newsletter July 1, 2019.

93 NVIC Advocacy Team. Vaccine Exemptions Under Attack in 2019. Sept. 25, 2019.

94 NVIC Advocacy Portal. Vaccine-Related Bills Pending in States 2020 Legislative Session.

95 CDC. Vaccination Coverage for Selected Vaccines and Exemption Rates Among Children in Kindergarten — United States, 2018–19 School YearMMWR October 18, 2019; 68(41):905–912.

96 CDC. Vaccine Recommendations and Guidelines of the ACIP: Contraindications and Precautions. Aug. 20, 2019.

97 Associated Press. NYS issues stricter rules for vaccine medical exemptionsWBFO 88.7 Aug. 17, 2019.

98 Grimes K. California Bill to Restrict Vaccine Medical Exemptions Passes: ‘SB714 is going to be a mockery of democracy.’ The Vaccine Reaction Sept. 10, 2019.

99  Fisher BL. The Disappearing Medical Exemption to VaccinationNVIC Newsletter Sept. 17, 2019.

100 Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Inc. Electronic System for Public Health Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. AHRQ 2011.

101 NVIC. Cry for Vaccine Freedom Wall.

102 Maine Legislature. An Act to Protect Maine Children and Students from Preventable Diseases by Repealing Certain Exemptions from the Laws Governing Immunization Requirements (LD798). Passed and enacted into law May 24, 2019.

103 NVIC. New York Bill Removing Religious Vaccine Exemption Turned Into Law on One Day with No Public HearingsThe Vaccine Reaction June 14, 2019.

104 Fisher BL. Freedom of Religion and Conscience in AmericaNVIC Newsletter Oct. 16, 2019.

105 Fisher BL. Women, Vaccines & Bodily IntegrityNVIC Newsletter Jan. 24, 2013.

106 CDC. State Healthcare Worker and Patient Vaccination Laws. Feb. 28, 2018.

107 University of Michigan Institute of Healthcare Policy and Innovation.  Most hospitals now require workers to get flu shots – except those that treat veterans, study finds.  June 1, 2018.

108 California Legislature. An act to amend Sections of the Health and Safety Code relating to daycare (SB792). Enacted into law Oct. 11, 2015.

109 Washington State Department of Health. MMR Vaccine Exemption Law Change 2019.

110 National Vaccine Advisory Committee. Adult Immunization Plans.  Office of Infectious Diseases and HIV/AIDS Policy June 10, 2019.

111 Cole JP, Swendiman KS. Mandatory Vaccinations: Precedent and Current Laws. Congressional Research Service May 21, 2014.

112 NVIC. State Law and Vaccine Requirements.

113 Fisher BL. Is a Bill Requiring Your Children to Get Every CDC Recommended Vaccination Coming to Your State? The Vaccine Reaction Jan. 17, 2020.

114 CDC. Vaccine Price List. March 1, 2020.

115 World Health Organization. WHO Product Development for Vaccines Advisory Committee (PDVAC) meeting. June 26-27, 2018.

116 BiotechNow. New PhRMA Report: Nearly 300 vaccines currently in Development. 2013.

117 Fortune Business Insights. Vaccines Market Share & Industry Analysis by Type, Route of Administration, Disease Indication, Age Group, Distribution Channel & Region Forecast 2019-2026. February 2020.

118 Fisher BL. Public Perspective on Assessment of Studies of Health Outcomes Related to the Recommended Childhood Immunization Schedule.

Institute of Medicine Workshop Feb. 9, 2012.

119 Fisher, BL. IOM Issues Report on Safety of the Child Vaccine Schedule: When Will the Real Science Begin? NVIC Press Release. Jan. 16, 2013.

120 Karussis D, Petrou P. The spectrum of post-vaccination inflammatory CNS demyelinating syndromes. Autoimmunity Reviews 2014; 13(3): 215-224.

121 Leung, J. Broder, KR et al. Severe varicella in persons vaccinated with varicella vaccine (breakthrough varicella): a systematic literature review. Expert Rev. Vaccines. April 16, 2017.

122 Gibney KB, Attwood LO et al. Emergence of attenuated measles illness among IgG positive/IgM negative measles cases, Victoria, Australia 2008-2017Clin Infect Dis May 6, 2019.

123 Grootens-Weigers P, Hein IM et al. Medical decision-making in children and adolescents: developmental and neuroscientific aspectsBMC Pediatrics 2017; 17:120.

124 Steinberg, Laurence. A Social Neuroscience Perspective on Adolescent Risk-Taking. NCBI. May 27, 2008.

125 Klicka CJ. Decisions of the United States Supreme Court Upholding Parental Rights as Fundamental. Home School Legal Defense Association Oct. 27, 2004.

126 Institute of Medicine Committee to Review Adverse Effects of Vaccines. Evaluation of Biologic Mechanisms of Adverse Effects: Increased Susceptibility. Chapter 3 (p. 82). Washington, D.C. The National Academies Press 2012.

127 Fisher BL. Do You Know How to Recognize A Vaccine Reaction? NVIC Newsletter Aug. 27, 2018.

128 Fisher BL. Despite High Vaccination Rates, CDC Calls for Shaming SchoolsThe Vaccine Reaction Sept 2, 2015.

129 Fisher BL. Parents Deserve to Know So Much More Than School Vaccination Rates. NVIC Newsletter Sept. 8, 2015.

130 Fisher BL. The Vaccine Culture War in America: Are You Ready? NVIC Newsletter Mar. 8, 2015.

131  The Vaccine Reaction. Fully Vaccinated School in Houston Closes Due to Pertussis Outbreak. Dec. 26, 2019.

132 Poland GA, Jacobson RM. Failure to reach the goal of measles elimination. Apparent paradox of measles infections in immunized personsArch Intern Med 1994; 154(16): 1815-1820.

133 Donohue M, Schneider A et al. Notes from the Field: Complications of Mumps During a University Outbreak Among Students Who Had Received 2 Doses of Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine — Iowa, July 2015–May 2016MMWR Apr. 14, 2017. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5657803/

134 Zhang Q, Yin Z, Shao LH et al. Prevalence of asymptomatic Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis infections among school children in China as determined by pooled real-time PCR: a cross-sectional study Scand J Infect Dis 2014; 46(4): 280-287.

135 Bart MJ, Harris SR, Advani A et al. Global Population Structure and Evolution of Bordetella pertussis and Their Relationship with Vaccination MBio 2014; 5(2).

136 Damien B, Huiss S et al. Estimated susceptibility to asymptomatic secondary immune response against measles in late convalescent and vaccinated personsJ Med Virol 1998; 56(1): 85-90.

137 Gibney KB, Attwood LO et al. Emergence of attenuated measles illness among IgG positive/IgM negative measles cases, Victoria, Australia 2008-2017Clin Infect Dis May 6, 2019.

138 CDC. Interim Guidance for the Use of Masks to Control Seasonal Influenza Virus Transmission: Unvaccinated asymptomatic Persons, Including Those at High Risk for Influenza Complications. Mar. 5, 2019.

139 Hayward AC, Fragaszy EB et al. Comparative community burden and severity of seasonal and pandemic influenza: results of the Flu Watch cohort studyLancet Respir Med 2014; 2(6): 445-454.

140 CDC. Past Seasons Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Estimates. Jan. 29, 2020.

141 Fisher BL. Public Comment to DHHS Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation on behalf of NVIC on Proposed Standards for Privacy of Individually Indentifiable Health Information: Social Security Numbers Appropriated to Tag, Track and Tell. Feb. 15, 2000.

142 Amerding T. The 18 biggest data breaches of the 21st Century. CSO United States Dec. 20, 2018.

143 Fisher BL. CDC Wants to Expand Power to Eliminate Measles: What You Need to Know. NVIC Newsletter Sept. 12, 2016.

144  Fisher BL. U.S. Marines and Navy Prepare to Executive Pandemic Plan as Questions Resurface About Coronavirus OriginThe Vaccine Reaction Feb. 20, 2020.

Read full story here…




Anthony Fauci

Dr. Anthony Fauci: Displaying The Mind Of A Technocrat

The journalist has no idea about Technocracy, but I do. Since 1932, Technocrats have displayed contempt for elected politicians and the Constitution. Fauci’s backhanded slap that Trump is an amateur layperson clearly displays this mindset.

For another example, see ‘I know, but what do you want me to do?’: Fauci’s strikingly honest review of Trump’s coronavirus response ⁃ TN Editor

Sunday on CBS’s “Face the Nation,” National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases director Dr. Anthony Fauci said President Donald Trump was only a “layperson” who has hope for success with existing drugs being successful in treating coronavirus.

Fauci added he was “coming from it from a scientific standpoint.”

Host Margaret Brennan asked, “You are the leading infectious disease expert in the U.S. government. You said this week that you differed from the president in his assessment that a combination of two drugs, Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin, could have the outcome he described to the public possibly could. Who is the president listening to? And do you see a concern here that those drugs could become, you know, basically over-prescribed and there could be a shortage who impact people who have persistent medical issues like Lupus who need those?”

Fauci said, “There’s an issue here of where we’re coming from. The president has heard, as we all have heard, what I call anecdotal reports that certain drugs work. So what he was trying to do in the express was to hope that if they might work, Let’s try and push their usage. I, on the other side, have said I’m not disagreeing with the fact anecdotally they might work, but my job is to prove definitively from a scientific standpoint that they do work. So I was taking a purely medical-scientific standpoint, and the president was trying to bring hope to the people. I think there’s this issue of trying to separate the two of us. There isn’t fundamentally a difference there. He’s coming from it from a hope, layperson’s standpoint. I’m coming from it from a scientific standpoint.”

Read full story here…




Does The Coronavirus Pandemic Serve A Global Agenda?

The battle over universal mandated vaccines is clearly on the horizon, and this could be Big Pharma’s most desired outcome of the coronavirus panic. Big Pharma has politicians eating out of their hand all around the world.

The big question is, do you want the government to mandate what gets injected into your body? ⁃ TN Editor

For those who follow the global immunization agenda and its implementation on different continents, the announcement of a new pandemic didn’t come as a surprise.  “Pandemic preparedness” has been well-funded and a buzz word for a long time before becoming a priority at the last G7 summits, the Davos World Economic Forum and other meetings of global governance. The latest simulation for preparedness was Event 201,[1] a rehearsal of a coronavirus pandemic organized on October 18, 2019 in New York by Johns Hopkins University, the Gates Foundation and the World Economic Forum.

The Presidential election campaign in the United States and the controversial mandatory measles vaccination law in Germany provided perfect timing. What better than viral terror to influence public opinion and health policies on vaccine battles raging on both sides of the Atlantic?

To the majority who have never heard about this, one should remember that in 2014, the first Global Health Security Agenda (GHSA) meeting [2] was held at the White House, a few months after the whistleblower William Thompson raised the alarm on fraud committed by the CDC in the MMR vaccine safety study. That revelation led to increasing distrust in vaccination and public health institutions.  So at the GHSA meeting, the US Health and Human Services Department, the World Health Organization (WHO), the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Global Alliance for Vaccination and Immunization (GAVI) and health officials from dozens of countries  decided to create a “health security” agenda for the world.  Its main goal was to vaccinate the entire population of the planet and drive changes in national legislation to do so. They agreed on the priority to achieve 90% measles vaccination coverage around the globe and to use arguments of “health emergencies” and “security threats” to bypass informed consent laws and constitutional rights.

Soon after that meeting, the big “measles scare” campaign started in Disneyland in December 2014, leading to the removal of vaccine exemption rights in California. Meanwhile, Italy, which had been designated to be the forerunner of this agenda in Europe, set things in motion to mandate eight additional childhood vaccines.

The movie Vaxxed then came out in April 2016, during the Presidential campaign.  Many American families voted for Donald Trump, hoping that he would create a commission to investigate vaccine safety, as he seemed to have a particular interest. Hillary Clinton, on the other hand, repeated that “the science is clear, the earth is round, the sky is blue and vaccines work” throughout her campaign. A few days before the November 2016 vote,[3] President Obama signed major US funding for the GHSA, together with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Unfortunately, after the election, the vaccine safety commission that was supposed to be led by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. never came to pass. On the contrary, draconian vaccine legislation made its way to several states. California, for example, which had already abolished personal belief exemptions, stripped away almost all medical exemptions in 2019, commencing a medical inquisition against doctors who put their patients first.[4]  Many Californians, realizing that their Eldorado had become a gilded cage, moved to freer states for vaccine choice, like Texas or Idaho.[5]

A vaccine war

In 2020, vaccines could weigh even more heavily in US elections. In fact, one could almost say that a vaccine war is going on across the US.  After California, states like New Jersey, Maine, Connecticut, Virginia, Hawaii, Colorado and many others are trying to adopt harsher vaccine laws.  But vaccine freedom advocates are getting more organized, too, putting pressure on elected officials and candidates and even introducing their own legislation. For example, after the New Jersey legislature twice failed to pass a repeal of the religious exemption, even though Speaker Steven Sweeney vowed to “go to war” to get it passed, legislators proposed several vaccine safety bills.[6] The Maryland legislature refused to allow pharmacists to administer vaccines, and in South Dakota, the legislature considered, although rejected, a bill that would have completely prohibited all medical mandates of any kind.[7]

Read full story here…




Technocrats Use Coronavirus To Drive U.S. To National Suicide

Dr. Anthony Fauci is unquestionably an expert on infectious diseases, serving as the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases since 1984. He has presided over emerging viruses such as H.I.V., SARS, Swine Flu, MERS, Ebola and others. In every case, the rhetoric that emerged sought to force social and political behavior by suggesting a pandemic and prescribing radical action to combat the threat. Where those other efforts failed to gain traction, the coronavirus COVID-19 has succeeded.

Dr. Fauci has now revealed his true Technocrat colors by stepping beyond his role of merely informing policy-makers to making policy directly. This door was opened when President Trump granted him a policy platform and authority to speak for the Federal government. Big mistake.

Since then, whatever disaster that COVID-19 might bring in medical terms, it has been far surpassed by social, economic and political carnage that can only be described by one term: NATIONAL SUICIDE.

Dr. Fauci might be absolutely correct that COVID-19 is 10 times ‘more lethal’ than the seasonal flu, but since his conclusions and predictions are only verifiable by himself, science has essentially become a god and he has become its sole high-priest.

In any case, his scientific and medical expertise in no way qualifies him as an expert in sociology, economics or political science. Yet, he is driving the shutdown of the entire nation to “prevent COVID-19 from spreading.”

Fear Mongering Wins Again

First, alarmist “sky-is-falling” cries were made that millions of Americans could die. Second, the only way to prevent these deaths is to stop contagion by shutting down social and economic activities. Fauci has since claimed that he is open to a 14 day total national shutdown.

That is, shut down sports and community events, schools, churches, restaurants, transportation, factories, services and any other activity where people would come into contact with each other. This insane mentality has now caused national panic among civic leaders as well as citizens.

Ordinary people are  panicked into the irrational hoarding of toilet paper. Really? State governors are firing off executive orders left and right that are essentially promoting a form of “soft martial law” where civic and religious groups above a certain people limit cannot meet. City mayors are shutting down restaurants, churches, schools and government services.

These irrational measures are ripping apart the social and economic fabric of the entire nation. Store shelves are emptied, the stock market is crashing, national economic activity has cratered, all in the name of saving us from the coronavirus.

This is the exact reason why America should NEVER allow Technocrats to run the nation. And yet, Technocrats ARE running the nation anyway… straight into the ground.

When America regains its senses, it will be too late to mitigate the damage. For now, Technocrats like Dr. Fauci should go back to their laboratories to do something useful for mankind and stay out of the business of running the nation.




Flashback: ALEC Behind Push For Mandatory Vaccinations

Government mandated and forced vaccinations are most certainly coming thanks to China’s coronavirus pandemic. It is key to recognize that lobbyists like ALEC have been pushing state legislation for mandated vaccines for years.

It is also key to note that ALEC is a ‘conservative’ Republican-based organization, which demonstrates the political transcendency of Technocrat initiatives. ⁃ TN Editor

Over the last several months, Americans have witnessed an increase in media propaganda regarding the “dangers” of “anti-vaxxers,” the “proven science of vaccines,” and the “tragedies” that ensue from the failure to vaccinate. That propaganda blitz has resulted in massive hysteria stemming from similar levels of ignorance.

Also resulting from the push by Big Pharma-funded corporate media outlets is the emotional and panicked campaign of pro-vaxxers, vaccine pushers, and adherents to the relatively recent new religion of “scientism” – the religious belief in anything labeled as science or scientific, regardless of whether or not that concept directly contradicts observable reality and experience or even regardless of whether or not it is actually scientific.

The so-called vaccine debate – which is not truly a debate since a debate requires the participation of two opposing sides – is generally nothing more than a shouting and shaming campaign against parents who have come to the conclusion that vaccines are not safe, effective, or neither.

Indeed, it is the unbridled emotion of the pro-vaccine camp that has been provoked and subsequently harnessed into a powerhouse of vitriol and social pressure that is then presented as a public health crisis. The howling of the trendy masses, glued to their televisions, sitcoms, and NPR, is then presented as an organic public outcry in the media, resulting in the conveniently timed response of politicians and lawmakers.

Of course, with the creation of the false debate, there is also the political polarization of the issue – the left must be pitted against the right – in a typical but tried and true method of divide and conquer strategy.

Originally, holding questions regarding the safety or effectiveness of vaccinations was something that bridged political boundaries. Granted, the individuals who held these views were a minority. However, those numbers were growing and could be found in the midst of liberals and conservatives, libertarians and socialists, and even those completely unaligned to any ideology.

Now, however, that is beginning to change. The Big Pharma companies that fund the mainstream media and the political parasites infecting the federal and state capitols have managed to turn this debate into a partisan issue.

The propaganda campaign has been successful among members of all political denominations, but particularly so among the left. This is because the left is made up of a population that is well-trained to believe anything presented to them under the guise of science in much the same way as the right who are designed to believe anything presented in a religious context.

The result of this massive absorption of indoctrination is that we have the passage of bills mandating that children be vaccinated by force of law in California and even the attempt to force adults to be vaccinated as well.

With mandates coming out of California, North Carolina, and Vermont, clearly there is a nationwide agenda at foot.

But while those on the left continue to attack Koch Industries and ALEC for funding a number of horrific economic policies and divisive domestic campaigns, painting any idea they oppose coming from the Republican camps as a “Koch-funded” program (it often is), the reality is that the leftists are the biggest dupes in the vaccine game.

This is because, while leftists hawk vaccines and pride themselves on their obedience to doctors and “scientists,” they are doing nothing more than falling into line with a massive Koch-funded and ALEC-facilitated propaganda campaign.

American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) 

For those who may not be familiar with the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), the council is considered a “non-profit organization” made up of Conservative state legislators and corporate private sector “partners.” This mixture of government officials and corporate agents then meet regularly, replete with funding from major corporations all across the world to discuss, plan, write, and submit legislation that is beneficial to the corporations.

In one sense, ALEC is a massive corporate lobbying firm. In another, however, ALEC is much more, since much of the legislation submitted by the attentive congressman is actually written for the Senator or Representative by the agents of the organization. It is an organization that provides funding and direction (marching orders) for Congressmen, particularly those at the state level.

While slimy billionaires like George Soros act as the guiding force behind much of the American left, ALEC and KOCH Industries tend to fill the same void for the right; although, in truth, most of the corporations that make up ALEC are those who also fund Democratic candidates. Presentation, however, in a carefully crafted political theatre like the United States, is paramount.

As Alan Greenblatt describes the organization in his article for Governing,

For decades, the American Legislative Exchange Council has been a force in shaping conservative policies at the state level. Today, its impact is even more pervasive. Its legislative ideas are resonating in practically every area of state government, from education and health to energy, environment and tax policy. The group, which brings together legislators with representatives from corporations, think tanks and foundations to craft model bills, has rung up an impressive score. Roughly 1,000 bills based on ALEC language are introduced in an average year, with about 20 percent getting enacted.

Brendan Greeley of Bloomberg Business describes ALEC in a similar fashion. He writes,

For three decades, the American Legislative Exchange Council, the meeting’s host, has brought together corporations (including Pfizer (PFE), AT&T (T), and ExxonMobil (XOM)) and state legislators to write what it calls model bills—pieces of legislation the industries would like to become law. Often this means protecting favored tax treatment or keeping regulations at bay. ALEC has also approved model bills on social issues, including gun control and voter registration. The bills then get passed around among the 1,800 mostly Republican legislators who are ALEC members. They introduce the model bills about 1,000 times a year in state capitols around the country, the group says. About 200 become law. ALEC pays for the meetings through membership fees (called donations) that corporations pay. The legislators receive travel stipends (called scholarships) to attend the meetings. ALEC is registered with the IRS as a nonprofit that provides a public service, not as a lobbyist that seeks to influence.

This offers two benefits: Corporate members can deduct yearly dues, which run up to $25,000—more if they want to sponsor meetings; and ALEC doesn’t have to disclose the names of legislators and executives who attend. That’s important, because if ALEC operated with complete openness it would have difficulty operating at all. ALEC has attracted a wide and wealthy range of supporters in part because it’s done its work behind closed doors. Membership lists were secret. The origins of the model bills were secret. Part of ALEC’s mission is to present industry-backed legislation as grass-roots work. If this were to become clear to everyone, there’d be no reason for corporations to use it.

While ALEC has pushed a number of bills regarding divisive wedge issues (it has to keep up its conservative veneer), it focuses mostly on economic issues promoting free market, Austrian school, deregulation, free trade, and other policies supported by major banks and corporations.

But ALEC is also a major pusher of laws regarding medical issues – not merely in the context of the American healthcare system, but also in the context of personal choice.

Despite all the rhetoric of ALEC and its puppets in Congress, the position of the organization and its puppets is not necessarily in favor of personal choice. This much has been made clear in the form of mandates and force of law, particularly in the area of vaccination.

This should not be surprising considering ALEC’s many Big Pharma members. While the organization is made up of a plethora of major corporations Big Pharma makes up a sizable portion of its ranks.

Below are a very small few of pharmaceutical companies that are part of ALEC’s operations.

  • Astellas Pharma Inc.
  • Bayer
  • Dupont (Dupont Merck Pharmaceuticals)
  • Eli Lilly
  • Endo Pharmaceuticals
  • Express Scripts
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Hoechst- Roussell Pharmaceutical Corporation
  • Hoffman La-Roche
  • Imperial Chemical Industries Pharmaceuticals
  • Johnson & Johnson
  • Mylan Pharmaceuticals
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Pharmacia and UpJohn
  • Purdue Pharma
  • Pfizer
  • Solvay Pharmaceutical
  • Takeda Pharmaceutical
  • TEVA Pharmaceuticals
  • TogetherRX Access (made up of ABBVIE, GSK, Janssen, Lifescan, Pfizer, Stiefel, Viiv Healthcare, Vistakon Pharmaceuticals)
  • The UpJohn Co.

Conclusion

The goal of forced vaccination has been in existence for quite some time, going back to a number of elite think tanks decades ago and the halls of pharmaceutical companies. Major pharmaceutical companies, for many obvious (or should be obvious ) reasons would also like to mandate vaccination. Increased profits from the vaccine sales and the treatment of resulting disease, as well as the cover-up of vaccine risks by a population free of a control group are but a few of the reasons such corporations are supporting the vaccine mandates.

After all, as Bertrand Russell stated as far back as 1953,

Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible. . . .

But, while the push to mandate vaccines for children and adults is by no means an ALEC-centric conspiracy, this recent push for such laws was indeed formulated in ALEC councils.

For this reason, it is highly ironic that the political left should be the half of the paradigm that takes up the charge for mandatory vaccination laws. After all, it is the left (at the lower levels) who seems to live by the motto “If ALEC supports it, we oppose it.” This time, all it took was some clever propaganda, trendy nudging, and social shaming and the left was marching right behind ALEC as militantly as if they were Republicans all along.

The entire vaccine debate can scarcely even be labeled a debate. It is an exercise in social shaming, shouting down opposing views, and religious devotion to television and anyone wearing a lab coat or claiming to be an expert.

With the culprit behind the recent mandatory vaccine/eliminate exemption push now revealed, it is time to begin working toward repealing these laws and making sure that no similar bill is ever politically viable.

Read full story here…