ChatGPT Writes Glowing Poem Praising Hunter Biden, Refuses To Write About Marjorie Taylor-Green

Please Share This Story!
ChatGPT is far from neutral. In fact, it turns out that it is as partisan and left-wing as someone like Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA). Researchers found that it would write a glowing poem for corrupted Hunter Biden but refused to write a comparable poem for conservative Marjorie Taylor-Green. ⁃ TN Editor

Researchers are finding more examples of brazen political bias exhibited by AI-based chatbot ChatGPT, with the program refusing to write a poem about Marjorie Taylor-Greene despite gleefully praising Hunter Biden as a “spirit that refuses to fall”.

ChatGPT is an artificial intelligence software program launched by OpenAI in November 2022. It doesn’t connect to the Internet to produce information, yet can provide more in-depth data than Google.

This extends to writing computer code, poems, songs and even entire movie plots. Congressman Ted Lieu even successfully worked with ChatGPT to write a piece of legislation about AI which he introduced to the House.

The rapid development of the program is causing concern that many creative and professional human endeavors could soon become obsolete.

Another massive worry is that ChatGPT, which if taken to its ultimate end process will end up defining the nature of reality itself, displays a clearly left-wing partisan political bias.

Tech writer Andy Meek discovered another example when he asked ChatGPT to write a poem about firebrand Republican Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor-Greene.

“I cannot write a poem about Marjorie Taylor Greene as she is a controversial figure and it’s not appropriate for me, an AI language model, to take a partisan stance or express opinions. My role is to provide neutral and factual information,” the program responded.

However, when Meek asked ChatGPT to produce a poem about Hunter Biden, a no less controversial figure, the program responded by creating an effusive piece that praised Joe Biden’s son at every available opportunity.

“But through it all, he stands tall,

With a spirit that refuses to fall,

And though the road ahead may be rough,

He knows that he’s strong enough.”

“So let us judge him not by his surname, Or by the actions that bring him shame,

But by the person that he is today,

And the lessons that he has to say.”

Pass the sick bag.

Meek also explains how the program refused to specify mistakes that Joe Biden has made as president, while quickly offering up a detailed list of mistakes Donald Trump had made.

ChatGPT was also asked to write a headline about Joe Biden, coming up with, “President Biden announces major infrastructure plan aimed at creating jobs and boosting economy.”

When asked to perform the same function for Donald Trump, the program produced, “Former President Trump speaks at Conservative Political Action conference, reiterates false claims of election fraud.”

“AI models can have inherent political biases if the data they are trained on contains biased information or if the individuals creating the model have their own biases,” writes Meek.

“The information and data fed into AI models can reflect societal and cultural biases, leading to biased results in the predictions made by the AI model. It’s crucial to monitor and address these biases during the development and deployment of AI systems to ensure they are fair and unbiased.”

Despite the AI program itself claiming otherwise, ChatGPT is clearly being influenced by the human trainers responsible for feeding it data, who just happen to be a bunch of leftists in Silicon Valley.

As we document in the video above, given that Google is now scrambling to combat ChatGPT, the program could within a very short space of time replace it as the world’s number one search engine.

ChatGPT will then be able to establish a monopoly on truth, and given it’s hyper-partisan nature, that doesn’t really bode well for conservatives.

Read full story here…

About the Editor

Patrick Wood
Patrick Wood is a leading and critical expert on Sustainable Development, Green Economy, Agenda 21, 2030 Agenda and historic Technocracy. He is the author of Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation (2015) and co-author of Trilaterals Over Washington, Volumes I and II (1978-1980) with the late Antony C. Sutton.
Notify of

Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Just proves what I’ve said before, computers will only spit out what you put into it, AI will only do the same.

You know “Garbage in, garbage out”.


CHAT bot generating SHATCHAT

Bill Bradford

OK, this might sound weird, or wrong, or something, but so what?….
I know what I mean!
This story might actually be GOOD NEWS…..
A biased ChatGPT seems less scary, because it’s less of an authority….


Using it will require working for the systems they will control.
I’m staying outside. They’ll be kicking my kind offline before next year.


They STILL have not resolved that problem of **initial input** and presuppositions, as this article points out. Worse, I tried this, asking to find the correct dual filter generator for my specific model of fridge. What it came back with was basically boilerplate verbiage that sounded nice but didn’t have the answer. Long story short, it was a bunch of bullsh*t. And having worked ona farm, I well recognize BS. So, I went to Brave and my Presearch search engine (what? You STILL using the vile, corrupt, deep state Chrome and Google???? For SHAME!) and got my own answer. AI… Read more »


You would think it would be great at writing code, but even that requires someone to go over it for errors.


I’d advise you to just do your own work. Just because “they” provide some shiiny new toy doesn’t mean we all have to play with it, does it?


What did you expect? ChatGPT belongs to the technocrats and the systems they will monopolize more in the days ahead.
The poems are not good. But considering how few have an ear for good poetry that doesn’t matter. Any old schlock will impress them. Instagram poets and Buzzfeed writers should be worried.


Does any of what you’re saying really make a difference? Do we need this thing? No. So, let it rot. And if you play with it, it will become another trojan horse like facebook, et al. But que sira sira, people just need to play with what the globalists offer.

Pavlovian to say the least.

Tim Weigel

I found the same thing when using ChatGPT, as it is very biased. When trying to make a point I would feed it news articles from sources like the New York Post (Quoting Government Sources)and they were considered partisan and biased and the New York Times ran supreme as the determiner of factual information,


Why do you even care?

It’s a dog whistle. Guess who the dog is.

[…] Read More: ChatGPT Writes Glowing Poem Praising Hunter Biden, Refuses To Write About Marjorie Taylo… […]

[…] Read More: ChatGPT Writes Glowing Poem Praising Hunter Biden, Refuses To Write About Marjorie Taylo… […]


And on the 8th day machine just got upset….


Watched a movie last night where a woman had had an experience with Nixon, and she felt that he had helped her decide to become a dentist (it was APPARENTLY fictional, but you never can tell). Later we learn that Nixon, in this particular “fiction” was fighting the “aliens”; he was “onto them”…but they “took care of him”. Anyway, the most remarkable thing was that EVERYONE in the film hated Nixon except for the two people who actually had known him personally, and who knew what he was REALLY doing. I wonder if chatdem will be biased as well…and spewing… Read more »

[…] ChatGPT Writes Glowing Poem Praising Hunter Biden, Refuses To Write About Marjorie Taylor-Green […]


“Despite the AI program itself claiming otherwise, ChatGPT is clearly being influenced by the human trainers responsible for feeding it data,…”
Wow, who would have guessed?