Fällt die globale Erwärmung endlich auseinander?

Klima Hustel
Bitte teilen Sie diese Geschichte!
image_pdfimage_print

The global warming fraud needs to be killed once and for all, but don’t think that will deter the UN and the global elite from rushing ahead with Sustainable Development. The march to global Technocracy will proceed at full speed unless we stop it as well. ? TN Editor

Mit der Wahl von Donald Trump sind der Klimawandel und die globale Erwärmung wieder in den Fokus gerückt. Auf andere Weise.

?The science is settled? isn?t good enough now.

Neither is the Globalist plan to cut energy production in every country in the world, in order to ?rescue us from frying.?

LA Times: ?Donald Trump will be about the only head of state who does not believe in climate science or the responsibility of his government to act,? said Michael Brune, executive director of the Sierra Club??

But all along, there have been dissenters from the manmade warming mantra; they just haven?t been allowed inside government portals.

Freeman Dyson, physicist and mathematician, professor emeritus at Princeton?s Institute for Advanced Study, Fellow of the Royal Society, winner of the Lorentz Medal, the Max Planck Medal, the Fermi Award: ?What has happened in the past 10 years is that the discrepancies [in climate change models] between what?s observed and what?s predicted have become much stronger. It?s clear now the models are wrong, but it wasn?t so clear 10 years ago? I?m 100 per cent Democrat myself, and I like Obama. But he took the wrong side on this [climate change] issue, and the Republicans took the right side?? (The Register, October 11, 2015)

Dr. Ivar Giaever, Nobel-prize winner in Physics (1973), reported by Climate Depot, July 8, 2015: ?Global warming is a non-problem?I say this to Obama: Excuse me, Mr. President, but you?re wrong. Dead wrong.?

Green Guru James Lovelock, who once predicted imminent destruction of the planet via global warming: ?The computer models just weren?t reliable. In fact, I?m not sure the whole thing isn?t crazy, this climate change.? (The Guardian, September 30, 2016)

Und dies ist nur ein winziger Bruchteil der Aussagen dissidenter Wissenschaftler, die die vom Menschen verursachte globale Erwärmung ablehnen.

The science is only settled in government circles where leaders have climbed on board the Globalist plan to undermine economies all over the world by grossly lowering energy production, as a way to ?reduce warming.?

Einer der Hauptverantwortlichen für die Erwärmung ist natürlich Al Gore.

Consider facts laid out in an uncritical Washington Post story (October 10, 2012, ?Al Gore has thrived as a green-tech investor?):

In 2001, Al was worth less than $2 million. By 2012, it was estimated he?d locked up a nice neat $100 million.

How did he do it? Well, he invested in 14 green companies, who inhaled ? via loans, grants and tax relief ? somewhere in the neighborhood of $2.5 billion from the Federal government to go greener.

Therefore, Gore?s investments paid off, because the Federal government was providing massive cash backup to those companies. It?s nice to have Federal friends in high places.

For example, Gore?s investment firm at one point held 4.2 million shares of an outfit called Iberdrola Renovables, which was building 20 wind farms across the United States.

Iberdrola wurde von der Bundesregierung mit 1,5 Milliarden Dollar für die Arbeit gesegnet, die nach eigenen Angaben den finanziellen Speck des Unternehmens rettete. Jedes bisschen hilft.

Then there was a company called Johnson Controls. It made batteries, including those for electric cars. Gore?s investment company, Generation Investment Management (GIM), doubled its holdings in Johnson Controls in 2008, when shares cost as little $9 a share. GIM sold when shares cost $21 to $26 ? before the market for electric-car batteries fell on its head.

Für eine Weile lief es gut. Johnson Controls war von der Regierung von Präsident Barack Obama mit 299 Millionen Dollar unterstützt worden.

On the side, Gore had been giving speeches on the end of life as we know it on planet Earth, for as much as $175,000 a pop. (It isn?t really on the side. Gore was constantly on the move from conference to conference, spewing jet fumes in his wake.) Those lecture fees can add up.

So hatte Gore ab 2012 100 Millionen US-Dollar.

The man has worked every angle to parlay fear of global-warming catastrophes into a humdinger of a personal fortune. And he didn?t achieve his new status in the free market. The Federal government has been helping out with major, major bucks.

This wasn?t an entrepreneur relying exclusively on his own smarts and hard work. Far from it.

?How many scientists and other PhDs have been just saying no to the theory of manmade global warming?

In einem Brief an das Wall Street Journal, den 16 Wissenschaftler unterzeichnet hatten, stand nur "Nein". Unter den Stars: William Happer, Professor für Physik an der Princeton University; Richard Lindzen, Professor für Atmosphärenwissenschaften am Massachusetts Institute of Technology; William Kininmonth, ehemaliger Leiter der Klimaforschung am Australian Bureau of Meteorology.

Und dann gab es das Global Warming Petition Project oder die Oregon Petition, die nur nein sagte. Gemäß Petitionsprojekt.org, the petition has the signatures of ?31,487 American scientists,? of which 9,029 stated they had Ph.D.s.

Global warming is one of the Rockefeller Globalists? chief issues. Manipulating it entails convincing populations that a massive intervention is necessary to stave off the imminent collapse of all life on Earth. Therefore, sovereign nations must be eradicated. Political power and decision-making must flow from above, from ?those who are wiser.?

Al Gore ist einer ihrer Frontmänner.

He jets here and he jets there, carrying their messages. He?s their delivery kid.

And for his work, he is paid $100 million ? a drop in the bucket.

A final note about the ?science? of global warming?

Eine Hypothese ist eine vorläufige Aussage, die durch Experimente bestätigt werden muss.

Bestätigung bedeutet eine korrekte Vorhersage. Nicht irgendeine Vorhersage, sondern eine nützliche.

Nehmen Sie diese Hypothese: Die Erde ist in den letzten 1000 Jahren um X Grad wärmer geworden.

Haben Wissenschaftler diese Hypothese beiseite gelegt, um genaue, spezifische und nützliche Vorhersagen über die Erwärmung zu treffen?

Bisher lautet die Antwort nein.

That eliminates, for the time being, the acceptance of the warming hypothesis. Many predictions have been made, many alarm bells have been rung, many dire warnings have been issued, many threats have been launched?but no correct and useful predictions.

Wissenschaftler werden jedoch sagen, dass ihre (abgelehnte) Hypothese auch eine Tatsachenaussage ist. Das heißt, es ist eine Zusammenfassung eines Erwärmungstrends, der aus Tausenden von Temperaturmessungen an Land, auf See und in der Luft in der Gegenwart und in der Vergangenheit abgeleitet wurde.

Wissenschaftler werden auch behaupten, dass ihre Untersuchungen ergeben haben, dass Menschen direkt und maßgeblich zu einem jüngsten Erwärmungstrend beigetragen haben.

An diesem Punkt verlassen wir die Methode der Hypothese und Vorhersage und kommen zu einer Debatte über die Genauigkeit all dieser Temperaturmessungen und die Ursachen tatsächlicher Klimaveränderungen.

Unter Wissenschaftlern herrscht große Uneinigkeit über die Genauigkeit der Messungen. Eine faire Prüfung der Studien und ihrer Kritiker wird dies offenbaren.

In dieser Hinsicht ist die Wissenschaft nicht festgelegt. Weit davon entfernt.

Also: nutzlos als Hypothese, die Behauptung der von Menschen gemachten Erwärmung ist tatsächlich weit offen für Debatten. Gelinde gesagt.

Yet?based on this non-proof, Globalists want all national governments on the planet to commit to lowering energy production by a significant and destructive percentage in the next 15 years??to save us from a horrible fate.?

Their real agenda is clear: ?The only solution to climate change is a global energy-management network. We (the Globalist leaders) are in the best position to manage such a system. We will allocate mandated energy-use levels throughout planet Earth, region by region, nation by nation, and eventually, citizen by citizen.?

Ja, Bürger für Bürger.

This is the long-term goal. This is the Globalists? Holy Grail.

Sklaverei durch Energie auferlegt.

Lesen Sie die ganze Geschichte hier…

Treten Sie unserer Mailingliste bei!


Benutzerbild
  Abonnieren  
Benachrichtige mich bei