ECOSOC: 2030 Agenda Calls For Redistribution Of Wealth And Income

TN Note: The United Nations’ Green Economy (aka Sustainable Development or Technocracy) is bent on equality, which has been declared to be the ‘redistribution of wealth’ on a global basis. However, ECOSOC President Oh Joon stated that inequality is more than an issue of income and wealth disparities; it is forcing every human on the planet into their system of command and control. 

30 March 2016: In the context on the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, the UN Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) organized a Special Meeting on Inequality to consider key drivers of inequality, and propose policy solutions. Participants discussed tackling inequality as a moral imperative and goal of the 2030 Agenda, and policy priorities to address inequality at national, regional and global levels. An informal President’s summary of the Meeting is expected to inform the work of the 2016 session of the High-level Political Forum on Sustainable Development (HLPF).

Opening the meeting on 30 March 2016, at UN Headquarters in New York, US, ECOSOC President Oh Joon noted that inequality is more than an issue of income and wealth disparities; these challenges are compounded by unequal access to basic human needs such as food, healthcare, education, drinking water and sanitation. Oh reported that: seven out of ten people in the world live in countries where income inequality has risen, “in many cases, to the highest level in 30 years;” women in rural areas remain three times more likely to die in childbirth than those in urban areas; persons with disabilities are up to five times more likely to incur catastrophic health expenditures; and children born in poorer households are less likely to complete their primary education. He added that social and political instability can lead to the emergence of extremism.

Jan Eliasson, UN Deputy Secretary-General, noted that inequality features prominently in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), including in Goal 5 (Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls), Goal 10 (Reduce inequality within and among countries) and as a cross-cutting issue that permeates practically all 17 Goals and their targets. Eliasson called for reaching “those furthest behind first,” and said reducing inequality should be a core benchmark by which the 2030 Agenda’s achievement will be measured. On inequality between countries, he cited illicit financial flows, financial manipulations, tax evasion and lack of harmonization of tax codes among countries, as contributing factors. At the national level, he highlighted steps taken by countries to contain or reduce inequalities, including: debt restructuring and prudent fiscal stimulus; commitments to expand equal opportunity, social protection and universal access to public goods and services; investments in public infrastructure; robust, transparent and inclusive institutions; and seizing the potential of financial technology to promote financial inclusion. Eliasson said inequality is not a value-free measure of economic activity, but is increasingly harmful, “pushing societies towards polarization and fracture,” and condemning children to “lives of hardship.”

Jonathan Ostry, International Monetary Fund (IMF), remarked that more equal societies tend to grow faster, and a more equal society grows more sustainably. Similarly, Jeffrey Sachs, Columbia University, reported that a study carried out by the Bertelsmann Foundation concluded that the more equal a society, the closer it is to achieving the 17 SDGs.

Denise Dresser, Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México, outlined some causes of inequality in Mexico, such as dysfunctional political economy, “crony capitalism” and corruption. Others highlighted the contribution of youth unemployment and climate change impacts to the issue of inequality. Several speakers said freedom and equality go hand-in-hand, and are not necessarily “fighting each other,” with Thomas Pogge, Yale University, noting that the fight for equality is also the fight for more freedom.

Many speakers outlined the multiple dimensions of inequality and its cross-cutting nature in the 2030 Agenda, and emphasized the importance of: addressing the structural barriers that lead to exclusion; universal access to healthcare, nutrition and quality education; improving market access, data availability and disaggregation; partnerships based on dignity and equity; official development assistance (ODA); inclusive growth; and fair trade and taxation. Marcos Bonturi, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), noted the relevance of the Automatic Exchange of Information in Tax Matters for preventing tax evasion.

Thailand for the Group of 77 and China (G-77/China) said addressing inequality among countries must be one of the UN’s main tasks, and called for enhanced representation and voice for developing countries in decision-making processes. The EU noted that inequality and poverty go hand-in-hand, and stressed the importance of intergenerational equity and of eliminating all forms of discrimination. Canada said addressing inequality is a priority internationally and nationally, and the country is refocusing its assistance to the poor and most vulnerable. He noted measures adopted in Canada in this regard including enhancing employment insurance and improving access to quality education for indigenous peoples. Iran noted that poverty and extremism contribute to increased inequality in the Middle East.

Also on inequality, the Committee on Social Development of the UN Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP) met from 28-30 March 2016 to discuss ways to strengthen the social dimension of sustainable development in Asia and the Pacific. The Committee underscored the importance of addressing inequalities within and between countries, and of addressing the impact of demographic change. Shamshad Akhtar, ESCAP Executive Secretary, noted that social development is a necessary condition for ensuring that ‘no one is left behind,’ and called for harnessing the potential of the nexus between poverty reduction, equality and social stability.

During the Committee meeting, ESCAP also launched the publication titled ‘Time for Equality: The Role of Social Protection in Reducing Inequalities in Asia and the Pacific,’ which had been published in December 2015. The report argues that inequality, in its multiple forms, is on the rise in Asia and the Pacific, and that this is adversely affecting sustainable development. The report also provides evidence that social protection is an effective instrument to reduce inequalities. [Meeting Website] [ECOSOC President Statement] [UN Deputy Secretary-General Statement] [DESA News] [UN Regional Information Centre for Central Europe Press Release] [Meeting Webcast] [ESCAP Press Release on Committee on Social Development Meeting] [UN Press Release on ESCAP Meeting] [Publication: Time for Equality: The Role of Social Protection in Reducing Inequalities in Asia and the Pacific] [IISD RS Story on ESCAP’s December publications] [IISD RS Sources]

Read full story here…

Related Articles That You Might Like

Leave a Reply

9 Comments on "ECOSOC: 2030 Agenda Calls For Redistribution Of Wealth And Income"

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Laura Adley

Which of the Presidential candidates will stop the UN from implementing this plan for one world government?

Linda Goodman

The only candidate who’s not a globalist puppet is Donald Trump. That’s why he’s under attack by even his own ‘party’. Investigate the past actions and future plans of all the candidates and that becomes patently obvious. Nearly all of DC are globalist traitors.


Funny how we have to redistribute our wealth, but the truly wealthy and corporate interests pay others to hide their wealth, so that we reamin forever in their servitude.

Christian American

The countries in bad shape are not due to the fault of Americans who are also in a weakened condition. It is the fault of the very rich politicians and other leaders around the world that the Unsustainable United Nations helps to stay rich and in power. The UN double crosses the world by supporting HAMAS terrorist group as members


The only redistribution of wealth will be from the workers, managers and the rest of the middle classes, the recipients will not be the world’s poor, but will be those instrumental in setting up the depository banks and bureaucracies to process the transfers. A likely example of balancing wealth would be providing more food (of the GMO kind) to the poorer countries, IE subsidies to the likes of Monsanto.

Terry Lee
It’s not the countries themselves, it’s the elected officials and the corporations that put laws into place to extract resources from countries and hit the people up to pay for it all, it’s the corporations..they have to be stopped. And the made up wars have to stop, and all these very rich people who think they are Gods have to be stopped, they fund most of what is negative to tear down countries and force them into slavery. This new world order, agenda 2030 has to stop, the UN must be refunded, period, these people think they are Gods and… Read more »

Disband the UN and give the poor the billions of dollars it saves us all.

What a waste of time and air those people are, we had enough of this rubbish wih Communism. “Equality” is not ‘equality of outcomes’, it is ‘equality of opportunity’. Giving other people the wealth our ancetors built up will just make us all poor, to be lorded over by the politicians, the bureaucrats and similar parasites.

Burn them all!

Nicole Leatherman

President Trump is our only hope, clearly there no other individual that could have taken on this EPIC Evil.

Follow Technocracy.News?

The only Authoritative source for

Exposing Technocracy

Stories curated daily from around the world

Subscribe and get the digest!

No SPAM! We will not share your email with any 3rd party.

Thank You for Subscribing!


If you don't receive a confirmation email within a few

minutes, please check  your spam/junk folder.

Wath for a confirmation email.