John Kerry Stuns By Proving The Futility Of Climate Change Action

Wikipedia

TN Note: Secretary of State John Kerry got unexpected attention when he stated, “If all the industrial nations went down to zero emissions – remember what I just said, all the industrial emissions went down to zero emissions – it wouldn’t be enough, not when more than 65 percent of the world’s carbon pollution comes from the developing world.”  This bring up several logical disconnects. If America were pushed back to an 1800s lifestyle, wouldn’t we pollute just as bad as every other 3rd world country?  The UN’s leadership has already revealed that the point of climate change dogma isn’t about climate change at all, but rather about redistribution of wealth on a global scale. 

Although he probably didn’t mean to, Secretary of State John Kerry made a compelling case for why the U.S. and other countries should not go down the path of shutting down coal-fired plants, raising energy prices and stunting economic growth to combat global warming.

Speaking in Paris, Kerry said:

“The fact is that even if every American citizen biked to work, carpooled to school, used only solar panels to power their homes, if we each planted a dozen trees, if we somehow eliminated all of our domestic greenhouse gas emissions, guess what – that still wouldn’t be enough to offset the carbon pollution coming from the rest of the world.

“If all the industrial nations went down to zero emissions – remember what I just said, all the industrial emissions went down to zero emissions – it wouldn’t be enough, not when more than 65 percent of the world’s carbon pollution comes from the developing world.”

He’s exactly right. Paul Knappenberger and Patrick Michaels estimate that the climate regulations the Obama administration are imposing on the energy sector – costs that will be passed down to households – will avert a meager 0.018 degree Celsius of warming by the year 2100.

In fact, the U.S. could cut 100 percent of its CO2 emissions and it would not make a difference in global warming.

Using the same climate sensitivity modeling as the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the world would only be 0.137 degree C cooler by 2100. What’s worse is that if you included 100 percent cuts from the entire industrialized world in their modeling, then you would only avert warming by 0.278 degree C by the turn of the century.

If Kerry got his wish, developing countries like India and China would play ball. But they’re not going to and quite frankly, neither is the rest of the developing world and some parts of the developed world.

Read full story here…

Related Articles That You Might Like

Leave a Reply

9 Comments on "John Kerry Stuns By Proving The Futility Of Climate Change Action"

Notify of
avatar
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
don
Guest

And where would the rest of the world borrow money if the developed nations quit producing?

Rick
Guest

They could be set free from the slavery that those so called “loans” shackle them! Its not money for starters, its “currency” and yes there is a world of difference.

Tom
Guest

The scientific illiterates in the Obama Administration operate in a “high dunceity” zone…..But, by golly, come hell or high water, they intend to “do it their way” even though they do keep stumping their toes on the most fundamental laws of nature. Aw faw down, go splat.

brtanner
Guest

From the bottom of Loris’ article: “Kerry got one point very wrong, however. We’re talking about carbon dioxide emissions, not carbon pollution. The administration has evolved their message on this issue, from global warming, to climate change, to carbon pollution.

“Carbon dioxide is a colorless, non-toxic gas that does not have adverse impacts on human health. Calling CO2, carbon pollution, is deceiving the public. But at least Kerry spoke clearly about the futility of any unilateral or multilateral plans to address global warming.”

Just using the term “carbon pollution” is sophisticated propaganda on the march.

Rick
Guest

“deceiving the public” those three words alone describe what has and will continue to prevent this species from becoming a level “1” intelligent on the extraterrestrial scale used by cosmologists and physicists! Yep, we haven’t reached level “1” yet!

Rick
Guest

“carbon pollution” the great OXYMORON used by morons!

Dr Tim Ball - Historical Climatologist
Guest

Latest book and documentary.
‘The Deliberate Corruption of Climate Science’.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tPzpPXuASY8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tPzpPXuASY8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sO08Hhjes_0
http://www.drtimball.com

Debate between Dr Tim Ball and Elizabeth May
Scroll down to Ian Jessop part 1
http://www.cfax1070.com/Podcasts

Rick
Guest

Although he probably didn’t mean to? I BEG TO DIFFER, ITS STRAIGHT OUT OF THE BOX THAT STATEMENT, NO AMBIGUITY ABOUT IT!

Robert Brooks
Guest

I wonder whether John Kerry can produce what nobody has done so far – proof that CO2 is a significant factor in climate change. Manny people have claimed this but no empirical scientific evidence has surfaced. Is he lying through ignorance?

wpDiscuz

The only Internet source for

Technocracy

Stories curated daily from around the world

Subscribe and get the digest!

No SPAM! We will not share your email with any 3rd party.

Thank You for Subscribing!

 

If you don't receive a confirmation email within a few

minutes, please check  your spam/junk folder.

Wath for a confirmation email.