The Rule Of Law Vs. The Rule Of Science

Rule of Law

The following article is about the importance of the Rule of Law in societies around the world. America has been a beacon and testimony to the benefits of being subjected to the Rule of Law, administered fairly to all.

By contrast, Technocracy proposes Rule of Science, which is altogether different. Rule by Science leads straight to Scientific Dictatorship and a society devoid of personal choice and freedoms we currently take for granted. This is the demarcation of the ages: Will we jettison Rule of Law for the Rule of Science?  TN Editor

In our efforts to reduce poverty, spur economic growth, and cultivate the conditions for human flourishing, the conversation can quickly be consumed with debates over material wealth and the allocation of physical resources.

Yet economists are increasingly recognizing the role “intangible assets” — unseen forces that propel humans toward increased innovation and collaboration. These include a range of underlying features, from basic honesty and virtue to the cultural appetite for risk and experimentation. But one of the most prominent has to do with the rule of law.

“Rule of law is essential if you want to have a functioning economy,” says Samuel Gregg in the PovertyCure series. “You cannot have a functioning economy without secure property rights. You cannot have a functioning economy unless contracts are enforced. You cannot have a functioning economy if government officials can act in an arbitrary fashion.”

Indeed, as the following excerpt explains, a society can have the right people with the right skills and the right tangible goods and materials, but if individuals lack things like property rights, fair rules, access to courts, and access to markets, economic activity will fizzle as social frustration climbs.

“Try and imagine a football match without rules,” says economist Hernando De Soto. “…The rules are crucial to get that game going. But everyone knows how to drive a ball. Everybody knows how to buy and sell, so there is plenty of entrepreneurship in the world. The problem is the rules. In two-thirds of the world, there isn’t yet the rule of law.”

Elsewhere in the series, we see a prime example of this in La Cava, a shantytown in Buenos Aires:

“Sometimes the physical differences between rich and poor neighborhoods are so palpable that it’s easy to miss an immaterial difference,” says Michael Miller.

Such differences don’t only end with mere economic frustration, just as the primary reason for having the rule of law isn’t it’s economic magic. Societies that lack fair rules and universal access and justice do a deeper damage and disservice to the human person, material poverty aside.

Read full story here…

Related Articles That You Might Like

Leave a Reply

Be the First to Comment!

Notify of
avatar
wpDiscuz

The only Authoritative source for

Exposing Technocracy

Stories curated daily from around the world

Subscribe and get the digest!

No SPAM! We will not share your email with any 3rd party.

Thank You for Subscribing!

 

If you don't receive a confirmation email within a few

minutes, please check  your spam/junk folder.

Wath for a confirmation email.