But a couple of things from a recent NBC News story about a cam-share program in Jackson, Mississippi caught my attention.
“Strapped for cash and facing a sharp rise in homicides, city leaders here are expanding police surveillance powers to allow residents and business owners to send live feeds from many types of security cameras — including popular doorbell cameras — directly to the city’s real-time command center.”
Livestreaming video surveillance to a police department is not inherently suspicious until you see who’s behind it.
The Jackson Police Departments’ real-time command center or fusion center would not be possible without Fusus.
“The new use of this livestreaming technology by police, which is undergoing a final legal review in Jackson, is drawing interest from other small cities that don’t have the resources to build their own surveillance systems.”
“The move made Jackson, which has struggled to keep up with advances in high-tech crime-fighting, one of two dozen places in the country where police agencies inked deals this year with Fusus, a small Georgia company that aims to make it easier for American law enforcement agencies to build networks of public and private security cameras.”
And that it where things become interesting or disturbing, depending on your views about privacy.
According to Pileum’s website there are at least 5 police departments including the Jackson Police Department using Pileum’s body cameras.
As NBC News mentioned, “Fusus, goes a step further than other surveillance systems by allowing police real-time access to home security systems, but does not offer or integrate with facial recognition technology.”
Police have the ability to track a person or person’s by the clothing they are wearing, by the way they walk (gait tracking) and they can ID and track any vehicle. All without a warrant. And no one is the wiser.
“What we’ll be able to do is get a location, draw a circle around it and pull up every camera within a certain radius,” Mayor Chokwe Lumumba said.
The reasons why this should concern everyone are too numerous to mention here, but EFF does a good job of explaining it.
“Even if you refuse to allow your footage to be used that way, your neighbor’s camera pointed at your house may still be transmitting directly to the police. The choices you and your neighbors make as consumers should not be hijacked by police to roll out surveillance technologies.”
What most of the news stories missed is the connection being made by numerous smart devices that, when rolled into one package, present a terrifying picture of public police surveillance.
As more and more police departments purchase body cameras, the greater fear can be illustrated by Pileum and companies like Axon who allow police officers in the field to tie their footage to real-time crime centers.
From the moment you or a family member step outside, law enforcement can ID and track you. Police Stingray’s that can ID and track your phone can be tied to Ring doorbell cameras which can ID and track you as you walk or drive through your neighborhood.
If you happen to pass a police officer wearing a body camera, assume the worst. At the very least they can ID you and your family by what they are wearing and by how they walk. At the worst law enforcement can use facial recognition to ID you and your family in near real-time.
Take this a step further and the picture becomes even bleaker.
From the moment you get into your vehicle, police can use license plate readers to track your every movement. Once you enter a store parking lot a police cam-share camera can ID and track your every movement and know exactly which item[s] you purchased. All without a warrant.
Allowing companies like Fusus, Pileum, Axon, Ring Doorbell, Flock Safety etc., to profit from destroying everyone’s privacy needs to be stopped before it spirals out of control.