Secretary Of Defense James Mattis Says Climate Change Is Real And A National Security Threat

James mattisGen. James 'Mad Dog' Mattis. Image: U.S. Department of Defense
Please Share This Story!

Donald Trump’s denunciation of global warming may turn out to be meaningless because of his cabinet appointments who will continue to not only promote, but also to act upon it. In this case, Mattis may continue in his Defense role as a Technocrat rather than as a patriot.  TN Editor

Secretary of Defense James Mattis has asserted that climate change is real, and a threat to American interests abroad and the Pentagon’s assets everywhere, a position that appears at odds with the views of the president who appointed him and many in the administration in which he serves.

In unpublished written testimony provided to the Senate Armed Services Committee after his confirmation hearing in January, Mattis said it was incumbent on the U.S. military to consider how changes like open-water routes in the thawing Arctic and drought in global trouble spots can pose challenges for troops and defense planners. He also stressed this is a real-time issue, not some distant what-if.

“Climate change is impacting stability in areas of the world where our troops are operating today,” Mattis said in written answers to questions posed after the public hearing by Democratic members of the committee. “It is appropriate for the Combatant Commands to incorporate drivers of instability that impact the security environment in their areas into their planning.”

Mattis has long espoused the position that the armed forces, for a host of reasons, need to cut dependence on fossil fuels and explore renewable energy where it makes sense. He had also, as commander of the U.S. Joint Forces Command in 2010, signed off on the Joint Operating Environment, which lists climate change as one of the security threats the military expected to confront over the next 25 years.

But Mattis’ written statements to the Senate committee are the first direct signal of his determination to recognize climate change as a member of the Trump administration charged with leading the country’s armed forces.

These remarks and others in the replies to senators could be a fresh indication of divisions or uncertainty within President Donald Trump’s administration over how to balance the president’s desire to keep campaign pledges to kill Obama-era climate policies with the need to engage constructively with allies for whom climate has become a vital security issue.

Mattis’ statements on climate change, for instance, recognize the same body of science that Scott Pruitt, the new Environmental Protection Agency administrator, seems dead-set on rejecting. In a CNBC interview last Thursday, Pruitt rejected established science pointing to carbon dioxide as the main driver of recent global warming.

Mattis’ position also would appear to clash with some Trump administration budget plans, which, according to documents leaked recently to The Washington Post, include big cuts for the Commerce Department’s oceanic and atmospheric research — much of it focused on tracking and understanding climate change.

Even setting aside warming driven by accumulating carbon dioxide, it’s clear to a host of experts, including Dr. Will Happer, a Princeton physicist interviewed by Trump in January as a potential science adviser, that better monitoring and analysis of extreme conditions like drought is vital.

Read full story here…

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
LorenzoGolia

Any abnormal climate change that is occurring is a direct result of geoengineering. There has been legislation allowing it here in the U.S. since the 60’s, and it has caused damaging effects to crops and the environment.
http://www.legis.state.pa.us/WU01/LI/LI/US/PDF/1967/0/0449..PDF

Arrow

Should we expect chemtrails to disappear soon?

mythblstr

“Mattis may continue in his Defense role as a Technocrat rather than as a patriot” This publication appeared to be right wing propaganda but when I read that sentence it confirmed it. It’s almost amusing how the easily manipulated capitulate to these sophomoric labels and revolve their belief system around them.