Internet Insecurity: NSA Cracks “The Two Leading” Encryption Chips

Image courtesy of Wikipedia, used for display only and not part of this story
image_pdfimage_print
TN Note: This story originally broke in 2013 after the Snowden revelations about NSA spy activities. However, the story won’t go away, because the NSA continues to aggressively seek ways to defeat all Internet encryption. Why? Because they want unfettered access to every piece of data and communication on the Internet. This is not a national security issue at all, but rather an expression of pure Technocracy that must monitor and micro-manage along the lines of a Scientific Dictatorship. 

On September 5, 2013, The Guardian, the New York Times andProPublica jointly reported — based on documents provided by whistleblower Edward Snowden — that the National Security Agency had compromised some of the encryption that is most commonly used to secure internet transactions. The NYT explained that NSA “has circumvented or cracked much of the encryption, or digital scrambling, that guards global commerce and banking systems, protects sensitive data like trade secrets and medical records, and automatically secures the emails, web searches, internet chats and phone calls of Americans and others around the world.” One 2010 memo described that “for the past decade, NSA has led an aggressive, multipronged effort to break widely used internet encryption technologies.”

In support of the reporting, all three papers published redacted portions of documents from the NSA along with its British counterpart, GCHQ. Prior to publication of the story, the NSA vehemently argued that any reporting of any kind on this program would jeopardize national security by alerting terrorists to the fact that encryption products had been successfully compromised. After the stories were published, U.S. officials aggressively attacked the newspapers for endangering national security and helping terrorists with these revelations.

All three newspapers reporting this story rejected those arguments prior to publication and decided to report the encryption-cracking successes. Then-NYT Executive Editor Jill Abramson described the decision to publish as “not a particularly anguished one” in light of the public interest in knowing about this program, and ProPublica editors published a lengthy explanation along with the story justifying their decision.

All three outlets, while reporting the anti-encryption efforts, redacted portions of the documents they published or described. One redaction in particular, found in the NYT documents, from the FY 2013 “black budget,” proved to be especially controversial among tech and security experts, as they believed that the specific identity of compromised encryption standards was being concealed by the redaction.

Read full story here…

Join our mailing list!


avatar
2 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
2 Comment authors
thomasAl Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Al
Guest
Al

NSA always has the means and manpower to leave us without encryption, but never seems to find the scammers, the hijackers, and the ransomware peopple….Hmmm, perhaps, they are one in the same.

thomas
Member
thomas

Why don’t they just f*&^ off down the toilet where they belong? Who died and made these bureaucrats our owners? They are all career prostitutes, whoring themselves for money and status. They belong on life’s dung-heap.