Professors Warn Of Perils Over Tech Taking Decision-Making From Humans

Please Share This Story!

It doesn’t take a professor to intuitively understand that human-created programs cannot rise above the biases of their creators. Technocrats miss this point, believing that any automated decision is more efficient and consistent than a human judgement.  TN Editor

In the future, your future might depend on a series of carefully calculated zeros and ones.

As technology improves, humans become less involved in decisions that affect our lives — and that isn’t exactly a good thing.

As artificial intelligence gains ground, college professors at the University of Massachusetts-Amherst have developed a program to test software for bias and discrimination.

Yes, racial discrimination. But more than that. Healthcare decisions. Loan decisions. Heck, even how Amazon decides package-sending rates.

“Today, software determines who gets a loan or gets hired, computes risk-assessment scores that help decide who goes to jail and who is set free, and aids in diagnosing and treating medical patients,” according to the program’s developers.

With that, it’s critical “software does not discriminate against groups or individuals,” argue researchers, adding that their field of study is “undervalued” and “countless examples of unfair software have emerged.”

In a scholarly article published for an upcoming software engineering conference, computer scientists Alexandra Meliou and Yuriy Brun, who created the program along with PhD student Sainyam Galhotra, detail the “growing concern” of software discrimination.

In the paper, the two professors forecast the evolving and increasing influence software will have on human life in the future, and argue software currently plays an outsized role in society.

“Going forward, the importance of ensuring fairness in software will only increase,” the paper states.

The scholars used examples that illustrate bias against the wealthy and the downtrodden.

One of the examples of software discrimination provided by Brun and Meliou is programming used by to determine what geographic areas would receive free same-day delivery. Following the roll out of the program last year, it was alleged that minority neighborhoods received the perk at a much lower rate than predominantly white neighborhoods.

The authors also highlight how software used in the public sector can project bias, spotlighting technology used in a number of states that calculates scores on the likeliness that a criminal might commit additional crimes. According to the researchers, the software has been found to “falsely flag black defendants as future criminals, wrongly labeling them this way at almost twice the rate of white defendants.”

Read full story here…

Join our mailing list!

1 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
1 Comment authors
M11S Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Notify of

In our economic system of capitalism based on “free” markets the markets part is already 90% artificial (HFTs)