Flashback: Broken Down And Rusting, Is This The Future Of Wind Farms?

image_pdfimage_print

TN Note: In spite of multiplied billions that have been plowed into “safe, renewable energy” wind-farms, the industry is in global decline. In September, a recent story appeared, Germany Now Faced With Thousands Of Aging Wind Farms. In 2013 it was reported that 14,000 Abandoned Wind Turbines Litter the United States. Is anyone paying attention to the trumped-up “promise” of renewable energies?

A breathtaking sight awaits those who travel to the southernmost tip of Hawaii’s stunningly beautiful Big Island, though it’s not in any guidebook. On a 100-acre site, where cattle wander past broken ‘Keep Out’ signs, stand the rusting skeletons of scores of wind turbines.

Just a short walk from where endangered monk seals and Hawksbill turtles can be found on an unspoilt sandy beach, a technology that is supposed to be about saving the environment is instead ruining it.

In other parts of the U.S., working wind turbines are killing hundreds of thousands of birds and bats each year, but here the wildlife can perch on the motionless steel blades.
If any spot was tailor-made for a wind farm it would surely be here. The gales are so strong and relentless on the tip of South Point that trees grow almost horizontally.
Yet the 27-year-old Kamaoa Wind Farm remains a relic of the boom and inglorious bust of America’s so-called ‘wind rush’, the world’s first major experiment in wind energy.
At a time when the EU and the British Government are fully paid-up evangelists for wind power, the lesson from America — and the ghostly hulks on this far-flung coast — should be a warning of their folly.

Few people were talking about saving the planet back in the early Eighties. The wind rush was a free-for-all in which get-rich-quick companies exploited ridiculously generous tax breaks to pepper the States with thousands of wind turbines.

For anyone who has questioned Downing Street’s controversial pledge — spurred on by EU green targets — to give £400 million-a-year subsidies to wind farms as well as hefty bribes to landowners in order to spur the building of an additional 4,500 turbines, the wind rush may sound eerily familiar.

Indeed, America’s growing band of wind sceptics insist that what happened three decades ago in the U.S. could easily recur over the next few years in the UK if the wheels come off the wind energy gravy train once again.

So what went wrong? It started with the late Seventies oil crisis that convinced America it had to look around for other sources of power. For a time, wind power was considered to be a serious alternative to fossil fuels.

Read full story here…

Related Articles That You Might Like

Join our mailing list!


avatar
3 Comment threads
1 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
4 Comment authors
Hans SladePatrick WoodPhillip MinkAl Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Al
Guest
Al

What’s truly amazing is the ignorance of the left and the right hand not knowing any basic engineering principles. If we all had electric cars, or if just 25% of us did, our current, aging infrastructure couldn’t not handle the increase, and wind and solar would not fill the gap.

Phillip Mink
Guest
Phillip Mink

Then why did they abandon the old ones and build new more efficient ones next to that?

Patrick Wood

Two reasons: 1) the old ones stay standing so they can continue to get tax write-offs and 2) government subsidies continue, allowing them to start the process all over again. There is no economic justification for wind turbines outside of massive government subsidies and tax write-offs.

Hans Slade
Guest

A classic example of wasted tax dollars for subsidized construction of devises that have no competitive value.
If the government had waited for subsidized R&D results that proved a product COMPETITIVE rather than “GREEN” we would be a lot closer to energy independence.

Hans