Chinese Military Discussed Weaponizing COVID In 2015 ‘To Cause Enemy’s Medical System To Collapse’

Please Share This Story!
The NGO receiving pass-through funds from the NIH to the Wuhan Institute of Virology is EcoHealth Alliance. Its institutional partners include radical environmental groups Planetary Health AllianceInternational Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN), the Convention on Biological Diversity and Futureearth.

The goals of EcoHealth Alliance are synonymous with the United Nations’s goal of merging ecology with health systems. Since humans are merely one component of the world’s ecology, it is deemed necessary to control them down to the molecular level. ⁃ TN Editor

In 2015, Chinese military scientists discussed how to weaponize SARS coronaviruses, five years before the COVID-19 pandemic emerged in Wuhan, China – where CCP scientists were collaborating with a US-funded NGO on so-called ‘gain of function’ research to make bat coronaviruses infect humans more easily.

In a 263-page document, written by People’s Liberation Army scientists and senior Chinese public health officials and obtained by the US State Department during its investigation into the origins of COVID-19, PLA scientists note how a sudden surge of patients requiring hospitalization during a bioweapon attack “could cause the enemy’s medical system to collapse,” according to The Weekend Australian (a subsidiary of News Corp).

It suggests that SARS coronaviruses could herald a “new era of genetic weapons,” and noted that they can be “artificially manipulated into an emerging human ­disease virus, then weaponized and unleashed in a way never seen before.”

The chairmen of the British and Australian foreign affairs and intelligence committees, Tom ­Tugendhat and James Paterson, say the document raises major concerns about China’s lack of transparency over the origins of COVID-19.

The Chinese-language paper, titled The Unnatural Origin of SARS and New Species of Man-Made Viruses as Genetic Bioweapons, outlines China’s progress in the research field of biowarfare.

“Following developments in other scientific fields, there have been major advances in the delivery of biological agents,” it states.

“For example, the new-found ability to freeze-dry micro-organisms has made it possible to store biological agents and aerosolise them during attacks.”

Ten of the authors are scientists and weapons experts affiliated with the Air Force Medical ­University in Xi’an, ranked “very high-risk” for its level of defence research, including its work on medical and psychological sciences, according to the Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s ­Defence Universities Tracker.

The Air Force Medical University, also known as the Fourth Medical University, was placed under the command of the PLA under President Xi Jinping’s military reforms in 2017. The editor-in-chief of the paper, Xu Dezhong, reported to the top leadership of the Chinese Military Commission and Ministry of Health during the SARS epidemic of 2003, briefing them 24 times and preparing three reports, according to his online ­biography. -The Australian

We were able to verify its ­authenticity as a document authored by the particular PLA ­researchers and scientists,” according to Robert Potter, a digital forensics specialist who has worked for the US, Australian and Canadian governments – and has previously analyzed leaked Chinese government documents, according to the report. “We were able to locate its genesis on the Chinese internet.”

Former US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and his chief China adviser, Miles Yu, referenced the document in a February op-ed in the Wall Street Journal, writing that “A 2015 PLA study treated the 2003 SARS coronavirus outbreak as a ‘contemporary genetic weapon’ launched by foreign forces.”

And according to Peter Jennings, executive director of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, “There is no clear distinction for research capability because whether it’s used offensively or defensively is not a decision these scientists would take,” adding “If you are building skills ostensibly to protect your military from a biological attack, you’re at the same time giving your military a capacity to use these weapons ­offensively. You can’t separate the two.”

The study also examines the optimum conditions under which to release a bioweapon. “Bioweapon attacks are best conducted during dawn, dusk, night or cloudy weather because intense sunlight can damage the pathogens,” it states. “Biological agents should be released during dry weather. Rain or snow can cause the aerosol particles to precipitate.

“A stable wind direction is ­desirable so that the aerosol can float into the target area.”

Among the most bizarre claims by the military scientists is their theory that SARS-CoV-1, the virus that caused the SARS epidemic of 2003, was a man-made bioweapon, deliberately unleashed on China by “terrorists”. -The Australian

News of the document follows a May 3 report that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was working with the Chinese government in a team which comprised five military and civil experts, “who conducted research at WIV labs, military labs, and other civil labs leading to “the discovery of animal pathogens [biological agents that causes disease] in wild animals,” according to the Epoch Times.

And as we noted in March, the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) – headed by Dr. Anthony Fauci, “had funded a number of projects that involved WIV scientists, including much of the Wuhan lab’s work with bat coronaviruses.”

In 2017, Fauci’s agency resumed funding a controversial grant to genetically modify bat coronaviruses in Wuhan, China without the approval of a government oversight body, according to the Daily Caller. For context, in 2014, the Obama administration temporarily suspended federal funding for gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses. Four months prior to that decision, the NIH effectively shifted this research to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) via a grant to nonprofit group EcoHealth Alliance, headed by Peter Daszak.

Read full story here…

About the Editor

Patrick Wood
Patrick Wood is a leading and critical expert on Sustainable Development, Green Economy, Agenda 21, 2030 Agenda and historic Technocracy. He is the author of Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation (2015) and co-author of Trilaterals Over Washington, Volumes I and II (1978-1980) with the late Antony C. Sutton.
Notify of

Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
D. Smith

This is what the vaccinations were all about from the get-go. Anyone who doesn’t “get that” is bordering on idocy.


only its not a vaccine..and it doesn’t help


Oh no way was Rona altered by the Chi-coms


Those foolish enough to take this Bioweapon will soon be subjected to complete compliance with the technocracy, or have their system (life) shut down. That is the epitome of control.,


I fell into conversation about UFO information with a vendor I met recently. He asked if I’d seen The Cosmic Secret. (For the reason I’m about to explain you need to keep reading). I understand YT is giving it away or you can buy it on Amazon $5.) He said you will not believe what’s in it, but didn’t tell me. I purchased it. I haven’t been to YT in 7-yrs since the site began posting their Draconian policies. It was released in 2019 before covid hit the USA. What is in the film that is so interesting? The executive… Read more »

Last edited 1 year ago by Elle

Patrick. Do you ever reflect on what your late colleague, Professor Anthony Sutton, would have had to say about this Technocracy and Great Reset business, if he were still with us? You knew Tony very well, and I believe you are one of the few people who could venture to guess how he would view our present dilemma and what he might say about it.


Very interesting that this occurred in 2015 — the SAME year that Nobama decided to ship the coronavirus from the NIH to China because it was ‘too dangerous to have in the USA.’ Exposed by Dr. Judy Mikovits, a former NIH virologist, who wrote a book named ‘Plague of Corruption.’

Debbie Fleischer

Very scary to think that this was started in 2003. I had heard 2005. I heard that scientists in the U.S. were working on this. This has been planned for years. Everyone seems to conveniently forget that this”vaccine” had not been approved by the FDA. The drug companies just keep trying to get everyone. Now they’re after children that aren’t even affected by the virus. Follow the money.