House Oversight Committee: Facial Recognition ‘Not Ready For Primetime’

House Oversight Committee
Please Share This Story!
Technocrats in law enforcement obscure the scope of their unconstitutional and possibly illegal activities. An epic battle line is forming between Congress and surveillance hawks. ‚ĀÉ TN Editor

The FBI and Transportation Security Administration (TSA) defended their use of controversial facial recognition technology in a hearing before the House Oversight Committee on Tuesday.

Meanwhile, some elected leaders blasted it as “not ready for primetime,” calling for everything from an outright ban of its use to¬†federal legislation¬†regulating it.

The blowback was bipartisan, with Committee Chairman Elijah Cummings, D-MD, pledging to hold more hearings. “I’m a little freaked out by facial recognition,” Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-MI, said. In his opening statement, Ranking Member Jim Jordan, R-OH said, “Today is a subject matter where we have a lot of common ground and a lot of agreement.”

Facial recognition tech is under fire from cities and representatives in Congress despite polls showing few Americans want to restrict it.

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors¬†voted last month¬†to ban city departments from using the technology, though it does not restrict private companies’ or citizens’ use of it.¬†Politico reported¬†that ban will also not apply to San Francisco International Airport’s planned deployment of facial recognition cameras due to a loophole in the law that excludes Customs and Border Protection (CBP).

At the federal level, there is uncertainty surrounding the technology’s further use, especially for law enforcement. During her testimony, Kimberly Del Greco, deputy assistant director of the FBI’s Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS), echoed the views of city¬†police departments¬†who say the technology has useful applications including tracking down suspects more quickly.

The FBI’s CJIS program allows law enforcement agencies at all levels, that have signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU), to search its database of criminal mugshots and find a match using facial recognition technology,¬†Del Greco said.¬†The database can return a gallery of of between 2-50 “candidate” photos, which are manually reviewed for a match.¬†The MOUs to cooperate with the FBI were signed before the conception of facial recognition,¬†Del Greco said, which some committee members scoffed at.

While the FBI said it only has access to criminal mugshots, Gretta Goodwin, director of justice and law enforcement issues on the Homeland Security and Justice Team at the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), refuted that. The FBI can access 640 million photos from various civil repositories, including the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), she said.

Goodwin and some elected leaders took the FBI to task for a report the GAO¬†issued, which concluded that the “FBI has limited information on the accuracy of its face recognition technology capabilities.”¬†To remedy that, the GAO said the FBI must take extra steps to ensure privacy and accuracy, although of the six steps, only one has been completed due to legal questions from the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ).

Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-NY, said more needs to be done to show the technology works, especially given the civil liberty concerns.

“You don’t have answers on how it’s working, how it was set up, what’s coming out of it, whether it’s hurting people, helping people,” Maloney said. “You don’t even have information on whether it’s aiding law enforcement in their goal for hunting down terrorists. We need more accountability.”

Read full story here…

Notify of
1 Comment
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments