The Rise Of Smart Machines Puts Spotlight On ‘Robot Rights’

Please Share This Story!

Should robots have ‘rights’? Do they deserve moral consideration? Will be a crime to interfere with their ‘evolution’? Technocrat-minded people are on a slippery slope in suggesting human-like qualities for their creations. TN Editor

You probably wouldn’t have any qualms about switching off Apple’s virtual assistant, Siri — or Amazon’s Alexa or Microsoft’s Cortana. Such entities emulate a human assistant but plainly aren’t human at all. We sense that beneath all the sophisticated software, there’s “nobody home.”

But artificial intelligence is progressing swiftly. In the not-too-distant future we may begin to feel that our machines have something akin to thoughts and feelings, even though they’re made of metal and plastic rather than flesh and blood. When that happens, how we treat our machines will matter; AI experts, philosophers, and scholars are already imagining a time when robots and intelligent machines may deserve — and be accorded — some sort of rights.

These wouldn’t necessarily be human rights, since these new beings won’t exactly be human. But “if you’ve got a computer or a robot that’s autonomous and self-aware, I think it would be very hard to say it’s not a person,” says Kristin Andrews, a philosopher at York University in Toronto, Canada.

Which raises a host of difficult ethical questions. How should we treat a robot that has some degree of consciousness? What if we’re convinced that an AI program has the capacity to suffer emotionally, or to feel pain? Would shutting it off be tantamount to murder?

After centuries of treating our machines as mere tools, we may find ourselves in a strange new world in which our interactions with machines take on a moral dimension.


An obvious comparison is to the animal rights movement. Animal rights advocates have been pushing for a reassessment of the legal status of certain animals, especially the great apes. Organizations like the Coral Springs, Florida-based Nonhuman Rights Project believe that chimpanzees, gorillas, and orangutans deserve to be treated as autonomous persons, rather than mere property.

[the_ad id=”11018″]

Steven Wise, who leads the organization’s legal team, says that the same logic applies to any autonomous entity, living or not. If we one day have sentient robots, he says, “we should have the same sort of moral and legal responsibilities toward them that we’re in the process of developing with respect to nonhuman animals.”

Of course, deciding which machines deserve moral consideration will be tricky, because we often project human thoughts and feelings onto inanimate entities — and so end up sympathizing with entities that have no thoughts or feelings at all.

Read full story here…

Join our mailing list!

2 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
1 Comment authors
Sam Fox Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Sam Fox
Sam Fox

This planet gets more weird every day. Robot ‘rights’? Gimmie a break! Somebody been watching too much Star Treck & absorbing the ‘Data is sentient being’ propaganda.

The absurd only gets worse every day.


Sam Fox
Sam Fox

A bit off the main topic, but I have been wanting to ask if any else thinks the NWO takeover of the planet will come when digital ‘currency’ replaces cash. That would explain IMO at least in part, why Jeff Zuckerberg is bringing the net to Africa. I have not seen anything in the TV news or online on that.

If I have the name & continent wrong please correct that. Thanks.