The Radical Polarization of Law Enforcement

Image courtesy of Wikipedia
Please Share This Story!
TN Note: This article was originally written by Patrick Wood on March 18, 2009, but it is as pertinent today as it was then. The movement toward polarization of law enforcement has continued unabated and unchecked.

Patriots, Chris­tians and con­cerned cit­i­zens are increas­ingly in the cross hairs of the U.S. intel­li­gence com­mu­nity, and battle lines are being qui­etly drawn that could soon pit our own law enforce­ment and mil­i­tary forces against us.

A Feb¬≠ruary 20 report enti¬≠tled ‚ÄúThe Modern Militia Move¬≠ment‚ÄĚ was issued by the Mis¬≠souri Infor¬≠ma¬≠tion Analysis Center (MIAC) that paints main¬≠stream patri¬≠otic Amer¬≠i¬≠cans as dan¬≠gerous threats to law enforce¬≠ment and to the country. Oper¬≠ating under the Mis¬≠souri State Highway Patrol, the MIAC is listed as a Fusion Center that was estab¬≠lished in coop¬≠er¬≠a¬≠tion with the Depart¬≠ment of Home¬≠land Secu¬≠rity and the Depart¬≠ment of Justice.

Because authen­ticity of the report was ques­tioned by some, this writer con­tacted Mis­souri state Rep­re­sen­ta­tive Jim Guest (R-King City) who had per­son­ally ver­i­fied that the report had indeed been issued. Rep. Guest is chairman of the Per­sonal Pri­vacy Com­mittee and is a promi­nent leader in the national blow­back against the Real ID Act of 2005 that requires states to issue uni­form driver’s licenses con­taining per­sonal bio­metric data. (See Guest warns against Big Brother, Real ID)

Rep. Guest stated that he was ‚Äúshocked and out¬≠raged‚ÄĚ at the report, which clearly paints him and many other elected state leaders, as a poten¬≠tial threats to law enforcement.

Instead of focusing on actual crim¬≠inal inci¬≠dents of ‚Äúhome-grown‚ÄĚ ter¬≠rorism, the MAIC report instead lists issues that it believes are common to the threats it per¬≠ceives. Thus, Amer¬≠i¬≠cans involved with the fol¬≠lowing issues are highly suspect:

‚Äď ‚ÄúAmmu¬≠ni¬≠tion Account¬≠ability Act‚ÄĚ‚ÄČ‚ÄĒ‚ÄČrequiring each bullet to to be seri¬≠al¬≠ized and reg¬≠is¬≠tered to the purchaser.

‚Äď ‚ÄúAntic¬≠i¬≠pa¬≠tion of the eco¬≠nomic col¬≠lapse of the US Gov¬≠ern¬≠ment‚ÄĚ – Promi¬≠nent scholars and econ¬≠o¬≠mists are openly debating the bank¬≠ruptcy and insol¬≠vency of the United States government.

‚Äď ‚ÄúPos¬≠sible Con¬≠sti¬≠tu¬≠tional Con¬≠ven¬≠tion (Con Con)‚ÄĚ‚ÄČ‚ÄĒ‚ÄČ32 states have called for a Con¬≠sti¬≠tu¬≠tional Con¬≠ven¬≠tion to force Con¬≠gress and the Exec¬≠u¬≠tive Branch into a bal¬≠anced budget, but many are con¬≠cerned that if called, Con Con would be taken over by hos¬≠tile inter¬≠ests who would intro¬≠duce Amend¬≠ments that are harmful to national sovereignty.

‚Äď ‚ÄúNorth Amer¬≠ican Union‚ÄĚ‚ÄČ‚ÄĒ‚ÄČMIAC states that ‚ÄúCon¬≠spiracy the¬≠o¬≠rists claim that this union would link Canada, the United States, and Mexico. The NAU would unify its mon¬≠e¬≠tary system and trade the dollar for the AMERO. Asso¬≠ci¬≠ated with this theory is con¬≠cern over a NAFTA Super¬≠highway, which would fast track trade between the three nations. There is addi¬≠tional con¬≠cern that the NAU would open up the border causing secu¬≠rity risks and free move¬≠ment for immigrants.‚ÄĚ

‚Äď ‚ÄúUni¬≠versal Ser¬≠vice Pro¬≠gram‚ÄĚ‚ÄČ‚ÄĒ‚ÄČ‚ÄúState¬≠ments made by Pres¬≠i¬≠dent Elect Obama and his chief of staff have led extrem¬≠ists to fear the cre¬≠ation of a Civilian Defense Force. This theory requires all cit¬≠i¬≠zens between the age of 18 and 25 to be forced to attend three months of manda¬≠tory training.‚ÄĚ (This is exactly what Obama and Rahm Emmanuel have repeat¬≠edly stated on national TV, and thus is hardly a theory.)

‚Äď ‚ÄúRadio Fre¬≠quency Iden¬≠ti¬≠fi¬≠ca¬≠tion (RFID)‚ÄĚ‚ÄČ‚ÄĒ‚ÄČThis includes human implan¬≠ta¬≠tion, but the larger con¬≠cern is uni¬≠versal id cards and per¬≠sonal prop¬≠erty iden¬≠ti¬≠fi¬≠ca¬≠tion that can be read elec¬≠tron¬≠i¬≠cally without the bearer‚Äôs knowledge.

Cit­i­zens who are con­cerned about the above issues are then lumped into rad­ical ide­olo­gies such as Chris­tian Iden­tity, White Nation­al­ists (e.g., neo-Nazi, Skin­heads, etc.) and anti-Semites. Tax Resisters and Anti-Immigration advo­cates are thrown into the same category.

The MIAC report then sternly warns law enforce­ment personnel,

‚ÄúYou are the Enemy: The militia sub¬≠scribes to an antigov¬≠ern¬≠ment and NWO mind set, which cre¬≠ates a threat to law enforce¬≠ment offi¬≠cers. They view the mil¬≠i¬≠tary, National Guard, and law enforce¬≠ment as a force that will con¬≠fis¬≠cate their firearms and place them in FEMA con¬≠cen¬≠tra¬≠tion camps.‚ÄĚ [Bold emphasis appears in original]

On the last page of the MIAC report, a sec­tion listing Polit­ical Para­pher­nalia (flags and sym­bols) states,

“Militia mem­bers most com­monly asso­ciate with 3rd party polit­ical groups. It is not uncommon for militia mem­bers to dis­play Con­sti­tu­tional Party, Cam­paign for Lib­erty, or Lib­er­tarian mate­rial. These mem­bers are usu­ally sup­porters of former Pres­i­den­tial Can­di­date: Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin, and Bob Barr.

Militia mem¬≠bers com¬≠monly dis¬≠play pic¬≠ture, car¬≠toons, bumper stickers that con¬≠tain anti-government rhetoric. Most of this mate¬≠rial will depict the FRS, IRS, FBI, ATF, CIA, UN, Law Enforce¬≠ment, and the ‚ÄėNew World Order‚Äô in a deroga¬≠tory manor (sic). Addi¬≠tion¬≠ally, Racial, anti-immigration, and anti-abortion, mate¬≠rial may be dis¬≠played by militia members.‚ÄĚ

What was the osten¬≠sible gen¬≠esis of all these ‚Äúthreats‚ÄĚ to law enforce¬≠ment? The report explains it this¬†way‚Ķ

“Aca­d­e­mics con­tend that female and minority empow­er­ment in the 1970s and 1960s caused a blow to white male’s sense of empow­er­ment. This, com­bined with a sense of defeat from the Vietnam War, increased levels of immi­gra­tion, and unem­ploy­ment, spawned a para­mil­i­tary cul­ture. This caught on in the 1980’s with injects such as Tom Clancy novels, Solder of For­tune Mag­a­zine, and movies such as Rambo that glo­ri­fied combat. This cul­ture glo­ri­fied white males and por­trayed them as morally upright heroes who were men­tally and phys­i­cally tough.

‚ÄúIt was during this time¬≠frame that many indi¬≠vid¬≠uals and orga¬≠ni¬≠za¬≠tions began to con¬≠coct con¬≠spiracy the¬≠o¬≠ries to explain their mis¬≠for¬≠tunes. These the¬≠o¬≠ries varied but almost always involved a glob¬≠alist dic¬≠ta¬≠tor¬≠ship the‚ÄúNew World Order (NWO), which con¬≠spired to exploit the working class citizens.‚ÄĚ

In other words, these ‚Äúridicu¬≠lous NWO the¬≠o¬≠ries‚ÄĚ were cre¬≠ated by psy¬≠cho¬≠log¬≠ical deviants who were trying to jus¬≠tify their own self-induced misfortunes.

Fear ye, all troopers

For unsus¬≠pecting law enforce¬≠ment per¬≠sonnel, this MIAC training doc¬≠u¬≠ment polar¬≠izes unsus¬≠pecting offi¬≠cers to fear peaceful, law-abiding cit¬≠i¬≠zens and greatly increases the risk of armed con¬≠fronta¬≠tion. For instance, a rou¬≠tine traffic stop would be esca¬≠lated if the officer observes a Ron Paul or Chuck Baldwin bumper sticker on the rear bumper of the car. The mere pos¬≠ses¬≠sion of printed mate¬≠rial such as the U.S. Con¬≠sti¬≠tu¬≠tion or Bill of Rights would be viewed as sub¬≠ver¬≠sive, even though most offi¬≠cers are required to take an oath to ‚Äúdefend and uphold the Con¬≠sti¬≠tu¬≠tion of the United States‚ÄĚ as a con¬≠di¬≠tion of their employment.

Addi­tion­ally, troopers are indoc­tri­nated that all such topics are pure fan­tasy and without any fac­tual basis. Even if they had their own con­cerns, they would be ridiculed into accepting the posi­tion that all crit­i­cism of the New World Order is dan­gerous to their well being.

The Columbia Daily Tri¬≠bune (Columbia, Mis¬≠souri) reports this con¬≠cern from local res¬≠i¬≠dent Tim Neal, who appar¬≠ently fits the MIAC‚Äôs ‚ÄúModern Militia‚ÄĚ profile:

√Ę‚ā¨ŇďIf a police officer is pulling me over with my family in the car and he sees a bumper sticker on my vehicle that has been specif¬≠i¬≠cally iden¬≠ti¬≠fied as one that an extremist would have in their vehicle, the guy is prob¬≠ably going to be pretty appre¬≠hen¬≠sive and not thinking in a rational manner, and this guy√Ę‚ā¨‚ĄĘs walking up to my vehicle with a gun.√Ę‚ā¨¬Ě [see ‚ÄėFusion Center‚Äô draws fire over asser¬≠tions]

MIAC is a Fusion Center

As men­tioned above, the Mis­souri Infor­ma­tion Analysis Center is one of a net­work of over 50 Fusion Cen­ters around the country.

According to the National Crim¬≠inal Intel¬≠li¬≠gence Resource Center (NCIRC), a Fusion Center is ‚Äúa col¬≠lab¬≠o¬≠ra¬≠tive effort of two or more agen¬≠cies that pro¬≠vide resources, exper¬≠tise, and/or infor¬≠ma¬≠tion to the center with the goal of max¬≠i¬≠mizing the ability to detect, pre¬≠vent, appre¬≠hend, and respond to crim¬≠inal and ter¬≠rorist activity.‚ÄĚ

As of 2006, the NCIRC listed 50 Fusion Cen­ters in var­ious states.

Most impor¬≠tantly, the Depart¬≠ment of Jus¬≠tice and the Depart¬≠ment of Home¬≠land Secu¬≠rity are the dri¬≠ving forces behind Fusion Cen¬≠ters, having pub¬≠lished ‚ÄúFusion Center Guide¬≠lines: Devel¬≠oping and Sharing Infor¬≠ma¬≠tion and Intel¬≠li¬≠gence in a New World.‚ÄĚ This report head¬≠lines ‚ÄúFusion‚ÄĚ as ‚ÄúTurning Infor¬≠ma¬≠tion and Intel¬≠li¬≠gence Into Action¬≠able Knowledge.‚ÄĚ

Fusion Cen­ters are one of five areas of infor­ma­tion sharing under the Infor­ma­tion Sharing Envi­ron­ment (ISE) that was estab­lished by the Intel­li­gence Reform and Ter­rorism Pre­ven­tion Act of 2004.

ISE mem­ber­ship includes the Depart­ment of Com­merce, CIA, Depart­ment of Defense, Director of National Intel­li­gence, Depart­ment of Energy, FBI, Health and Human Ser­vices, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Depart­ment of Home­land Secu­rity, National Counter-Terrorism Center, Depart­ment of Inte­rior, Office of Man­age­ment and Budget, Depart­ment of Jus­tice, Depart­ment of State, Depart­ment of Trans­porta­tion and the Depart­ment of Treasury.

According to one white paper (on the ISE web site) enti¬≠tled The Intel¬≠li¬≠gence Fusion Process for State, Local and Tribal Law Enforce¬≠ment, ‚ÄúThe most impor¬≠tant output of the intel¬≠li¬≠gence Fusion Center is action¬≠able intel¬≠li¬≠gence. This means that the intel¬≠li¬≠gence pro¬≠duced by the center will drive oper¬≠a¬≠tional responses and strategic aware¬≠ness of threats.‚ÄĚ Accordingly,

‚ÄúThe heart of good intel¬≠li¬≠gence analysis is to have a diverse array of valid and reli¬≠able raw infor¬≠ma¬≠tion for analysis. The more robust the raw infor¬≠ma¬≠tion, the more accu¬≠rate the ana¬≠lytic output (i.e., intel¬≠li¬≠gence) will¬†be.‚ÄĚ

The above men¬≠tioned MIAC report, issued by an offi¬≠cial Fusion Center, is appar¬≠ently part of this ‚Äúdiverse array of valid and reli¬≠able raw information.‚ÄĚ

How¬≠ever, ISE‚Äôs under¬≠standing of intel¬≠li¬≠gence is foolish. Any intel¬≠li¬≠gence ana¬≠lyst knows that so-called raw infor¬≠ma¬≠tion is treated as garbage until ver¬≠i¬≠fied from mul¬≠tiple sources to val¬≠i¬≠date accu¬≠racy, com¬≠plete¬≠ness and freedom from bias. Sec¬≠ondly, ana¬≠lytic output depends upon trained and expe¬≠ri¬≠enced human rea¬≠soning and judg¬≠ment, not on the ‚Äúrobust¬≠ness‚ÄĚ of the raw infor¬≠ma¬≠tion itself.

Where do Fusion Cen­ters get inputs?

According to their own doc¬≠u¬≠ments, Fusion Cen¬≠ters are ‚Äúseeded‚ÄĚ with ideas for analysis by the FBI and the Depart¬≠ment of Home¬≠land Secu¬≠rity. Although this is prob¬≠lem¬≠atic in itself, atten¬≠tion is better directed to the left-wing non¬≠profit orga¬≠ni¬≠za¬≠tion, Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC).

Upon careful word and theme com­par­ison between the MIAC report and SPLC lit­er­a­ture, it is apparent that there is a sig­nif­i­cant link between the two. Either MIAC received training or training mate­rial from SPLC or some of its per­sonnel had some pre­vious expo­sure to it.

The SPLC aggres¬≠sively offers training to local, state and fed¬≠eral law enforce¬≠ment agen¬≠cies. According to the SPLC web site, ‚ÄúWe focus on the his¬≠tory, back¬≠ground, leaders and activ¬≠i¬≠ties of far-right extrem¬≠ists in the U.S.‚ÄĚ and states that it ‚Äúis inter¬≠na¬≠tion¬≠ally known for its tol¬≠er¬≠ance edu¬≠ca¬≠tion pro¬≠grams, its legal vic¬≠to¬≠ries against white suprema¬≠cists and its tracking of hate groups.‚ÄĚ

Hate crimes are essen­tially acts of vil­i­fi­ca­tion of a victim because of his or her mem­ber­ship in a cer­tain social group, such as racial, reli­gious, sexual ori­en­ta­tion, nation­ality, gender, etc. While hate crimes are wrong under any cir­cum­stance, the SPLC sees no con­flict in pro­filing con­ser­v­a­tive whites, Chris­tians, Con­sti­tu­tion­al­ists, and patriots as being asso­ci­ated with, if not respon­sible for, hate crimes in America. This is the pot calling the kettle black.

For instance, con¬≠sider the SPLC state¬≠ment, ‚Äú‚Ķa basic fact about all three move¬≠ments: Patriots, white suprema¬≠cists and anti-abortion mil¬≠i¬≠tants are all fueled by inter¬≠pre¬≠ta¬≠tions of religion.‚ÄĚ

Aside from the fact that this sweeping gen­er­al­iza­tion is plainly not true, it is mud-slinging at its best: Patriots are lumped in with white suprema­cists, anti-abortionists are mil­i­tants, and all are driven by an obvi­ously irra­tional and fanat­ical appli­ca­tion of religion.

In another SPLC article about a tragic killing in South Car¬≠olina, enti¬≠tled ‚ÄúThe Abbeville Horror‚ÄĚ, the writer goes well beyond just the facts of the story and is careful to sprinkle in words and phrases such¬†as:

Patriots, tax pro¬≠tes¬≠tors, sov¬≠er¬≠eign cit¬≠i¬≠zens, antigov¬≠ern¬≠ment extrem¬≠ists, New World Order para¬≠noia, Dis¬≠arming U.S. Cit¬≠i¬≠zens, hard-line Chris¬≠tian Right, con¬≠sti¬≠tu¬≠tional rights, antigov¬≠ern¬≠ment ‚ÄúPatriot‚ÄĚ lit¬≠er¬≠a¬≠ture, anti-Semitic con¬≠spiracy, ‚ÄúLive Free or Die,‚ÄĚ Ruby Ridge and Waco, Second Amend¬≠ment, extremist orga¬≠nizing, ‚Äúcloset extrem¬≠ists,‚ÄĚ para¬≠noid beliefs, ‚ÄúGive me lib¬≠erty or give me death.‚ÄĚ [quotes appear in orig¬≠inal¬†text]

These are the same kinds of words and themes that are seen in The Modern Militia Move­ment article, where dis­tinc­tions between good and bad people are blurred and con­fused: All are guilty by asso­ci­a­tion, if nothing else.

Should a pri¬≠vate orga¬≠ni¬≠za¬≠tion like SPLC be allowed to pro¬≠vide offi¬≠cial training to public-entrusted law enforce¬≠ment agen¬≠cies? Most would say, ‚ÄúNo.‚ÄĚ Even if the training was free, the agency should reject influ¬≠ence from the public sector, and even more so if it presents biased and one-sided infor¬≠ma¬≠tion that is claimed to be factual.


It is crit­ical to under­stand that the legit­i­mate law enforce­ment agen­cies of cities, coun­ties and states are not adver­saries of the people. They are greatly needed for pro­tec­tion against crime and for keeping order in our communities.

They are, how­ever, being method­i­cally seeded with very wrong­headed and dan­gerous infor­ma­tion, the spe­cific intent of which is to polarize law enforce­ment against peaceful cit­i­zens who simply care about the down­fall of their country.

This writer inter¬≠viewed Chuck Baldwin and asked about how he felt when he first saw his good name asso¬≠ci¬≠ated with those who would threaten bodily harm to law enforce¬≠ment agen¬≠cies. ‚ÄúPer¬≠son¬≠ally, I was stunned,‚ÄĚ he said, ‚Äúbut my family has taken this very per¬≠son¬≠ally as well. This is more than disturbing.‚ÄĚ

When asked about the pos¬≠sible affect of the report on the Con¬≠sti¬≠tu¬≠tion Party, of which he was the 2008 pres¬≠i¬≠den¬≠tial can¬≠di¬≠date, he replied, ‚ÄúI think it will gal¬≠va¬≠nize people and help them to under¬≠stand the nature of the battle we are in. Freedom must be defended.‚ÄĚ

In fact, the MIAC report has cre­ated a firestorm all over America. Tens of thou­sands of protests are being called, written, emailed and faxed to author­i­ties and leg­is­la­tors in Mis­souri. It would not be sur­prising to see the report rescinded and an apology given.

Even so, behind-the-scene groups like the SPLC will con­tinue unabated and unde­terred in their effort to mis­in­form and dis­rupt healthy com­mu­nity rela­tions with worthy law enforce­ment agen­cies and personnel.

The mes­sage to every juris­dic­tion: Don’t let it happen!

Final thought

Locate the Fusion Center in your state and keep a close eye on the infor­ma­tion they are releasing. Stay close to as many law enforce­ment per­sonnel as you can, asking them to keep their eyes open for reports sim­ilar to the Mis­souri report. Peti­tion your state leg­is­la­tors to ban law enforce­ment training by pri­vate orga­ni­za­tions such as the Southern Poverty Law Center.

Addi­tional resources

FBI nudges state ‚Äėfusion cen¬≠ters‚Äô into the shadows (CNET)

Fusion Cen­ters and Pri­vacy (EPIC)

Back­grounder: Fusion Cen­ters (

Infor­ma­tion Sharing Envi­ron­ment (ISE)

ISE Web site

About the Editor

Patrick Wood
Patrick Wood is a leading and critical expert on Sustainable Development, Green Economy, Agenda 21, 2030 Agenda and historic Technocracy. He is the author of Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation (2015) and co-author of Trilaterals Over Washington, Volumes I and II (1978-1980) with the late Antony C. Sutton.
Notify of

1 Comment
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Very timely repost of this article. The Paris attacks seem to mark another inflection point in the effort to silence dissent and impose groupthink. Scanning some of the CFR’s Foreign Policy online articles covering Paris, it was apparent the word “terrorist” had been replaced with “extremist”. Attempts to blur the lines are coming at us fast. A recent blog entry on the website of Agenda 21 educator Rosa Koire reported the University of California at Davis library placed her book Behind The Green Mask in a non-circulating holding collection categorized as examples of radical and political right wing pamphlets. In… Read more »