Dr. Meryl Nass has been an outspoken critic of health directives that ban HCQ and Ivermectin for early treatment of COVID infections. The State of Maine Board of Licensure took action to crush her medical practice by pulling her medical license, and to add insult to injury, ordered her to undergo a psych evaluation. This appears to be following Orwell’s 1984 storyline where Winston is cast as Dr. Nass. ⁃ TN Editor
A doctor with decades of experience can’t practice medicine after her license was temporarily suspended over complaints that she shared coronavirus misinformation, according to a Maine licensing board.
The board has ordered her to undergo a neuropsychological evaluation, it said.
Dr. Meryl J. Nass, who got a license to practice medicine in Maine in 1997, had her license “immediately” suspended for 30 days after a board investigation and review of complaints against her on Jan. 12, according to a suspension order from the Maine Board of Licensure in Medicine.
Nass, who’s an internist in Ellsworth, must “submit” to an evaluation by a “Board-selected psychologist” on Feb. 1, the board’s evaluation order issued Jan. 11 said.
“I have no comment about submitting to a neuropsych exam, except that the board ordered me to do so on shaky grounds,” Nass told McClatchy News, adding that she’s had her license for a total of 41 years.
“The information received by the Board demonstrates that Dr. Nass is or may be unable to practice medicine with reasonable skill and safety to her patients by reason of mental illness, alcohol intemperance, excessive use of drugs, narcotics, or as a result of a mental or physical condition interfering with the competent practice of medicine,” the evaluation order states.
The complaints against Nass include how the board was told she engaged in “public dissemination of ‘misinformation’” about COVID-19 and vaccinations “via a video interview and on her website,” the board said about the October 26, 2021 complaint. It lists several comments Nass made that were subject to the board’s investigation.
Roughly 10 days later, the board got another complaint about Nass “spreading COVID and COVID vaccination misinformation on Twitter,” it said.
Nass called “disinformation and misinformation” a “fuzzy concept” that the board hasn’t defined for her, she said. “There’s no law that says doctors can’t express their educated opinion on any subject.”
Other grounds for her suspension include how Nass treated COVID-19 patients with Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, according to the board.
The board noted that Ivermectin isn’t Food and Drug Administration “authorized or approved” as a treatment for COVID-19 in the suspension order.
Ivermectin is used as a parasitic treatment for animals, according to the FDA.
“For humans, ivermectin tablets are approved at very specific doses to treat some parasitic worms, and there are topical (on the skin) formulations for head lice and skin conditions like rosacea,” the agency explains online.
Additionally, it noted the FDA “revoked’ emergency use authorization for hydroxychloroquine since it “may not be effective” against COVID-19.
Patrick Wood is a leading and critical expert on Sustainable Development, Green Economy, Agenda 21, 2030 Agenda and historic Technocracy. He is the author of Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation (2015) and co-author of Trilaterals Over Washington, Volumes I and II (1978-1980) with the late Antony C. Sutton.
Subscribe
8 Comments
Oldest
NewestMost Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Joe Boudreault
January 18, 2022 2:37 pm
Never go against the medical system tyrants who are bought off by Big Pharma. No money to be made by them from real drugs, just the fake “vaccines” and masks and hand ‘sanitizers’…
Ordering psychiatric exams for political enemies is exactly what the USSR’s central Communist government did to intellectual enemies of the regime in the 1970’s and 80’s. See Political Abuse of Psychiatry—An Historical Overview in the National Library of Medicine. My East European relatives had first hand experience of this psychiatric buffoonery and would tell me about such things. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2800147/). It used to be a joke among attorneys that if you have no arguments against a witness , abuse them. This is what the Leftists are currently doing. There is nothing new in all this. You can read in Plato’s Republic… Read more »
Denise
January 18, 2022 6:43 pm
“may not be effective” against Covid 19? That means it MAY BE effective and the doctor should be able to prescribe it.
How many people died because their doctor was prevented from “right to try?” Unforgivable.
wpDiscuz
Never go against the medical system tyrants who are bought off by Big Pharma. No money to be made by them from real drugs, just the fake “vaccines” and masks and hand ‘sanitizers’…
Ordering psychiatric exams for political enemies is exactly what the USSR’s central Communist government did to intellectual enemies of the regime in the 1970’s and 80’s. See Political Abuse of Psychiatry—An Historical Overview in the National Library of Medicine. My East European relatives had first hand experience of this psychiatric buffoonery and would tell me about such things. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2800147/). It used to be a joke among attorneys that if you have no arguments against a witness , abuse them. This is what the Leftists are currently doing. There is nothing new in all this. You can read in Plato’s Republic… Read more »
“may not be effective” against Covid 19? That means it MAY BE effective and the doctor should be able to prescribe it.
How many people died because their doctor was prevented from “right to try?” Unforgivable.
[…] Doctor Loses License For Prescribing HCQ, Ivermectin; Ordered To Psych Evaluation […]
[…] Source Technocracy News & Trends Jan […]
Admiration respect pour ce médecin fidèle au serment d’Hippocrate
Honte aux laquais de big pharma
[…] Doctor Loses License For Prescribing HCQ, Ivermectin; Ordered To Psych Evaluation […]
So, she’s ordered to take a psych exam to be given by a board appointee. Question: If they find her competent, do THEY lose their license?