Huh? EU Suddenly Declares Natural Gas, Nuclear To Be ‘Climate Friendly’

Please Share This Story!
Radical environmental extremists are having a total meltdown over this shock ruling that puts natural gas back on the “climate friendly” list. Natural gas is an extremely clean source of energy but radicals hate it because they (wrongly) consider it a fossil fuel. There are at least 200 years of known natural gas reserves in the world. ⁃ TN Editor

The European Parliament on Wednesday voted not to block a proposed rule that would designate gas and nuclear power plants as “climate-friendly.” The rule will take effect unless 20 of the European Union’s (EU) 27 member states band together to stop it.

The EU keeps a “taxonomy,” or rulebook, that designates which types of energy investment can be labeled “green.” The terminology is considered valuable for marketing purposes and to attract investors looking for climate-friendly projects. “Green” projects are also eligible for favorable government loans, and even outright government subsidies.

The taxonomy is supposed to prevent “greenwashing,” loosely defined as falsely claiming a project is climate-friendly, although radical Greens derisively use the term for every enterprise they deem insufficiently pure.

The law approved 328-278 by the European Parliament in Strasbourg, France, on Wednesday will add numerous natural gas and nuclear energy projects to the taxonomy, beginning next year.

Environmentalists denounced the move, and demonstrated outside the European Parliament to show their displeasure, because they are unalterably hostile to nuclear power, no matter how “clean” it might be.

“It’s dirty politics and it’s an outrageous outcome to label gas and nuclear as green and keep more money flowing to Putin’s war chest, but now we will fight this in the courts,” howled Greenpeace EU’s Ariadna Rodrigo.

As the Associated Press pointed out, nuclear power is unquestionably “clean” and “climate-friendly” by any scientific definitions of the terms, as it produces no carbon emissions. Green purists insist nuclear power is too risky to play a major role in achieving “carbon neutrality.”

Liquid natural gas (LNG) is also climate-friendly by any rational definition, producing roughly 30 percent less carbon dioxide than fuel oil and 45 percent less than coal, plus dramatically reduced or zero emissions of other compounds thought to be harmful to the environment. Greens despise LNG because it is a “fossil fuel.”

Read full story here…

About the Author

Patrick Wood
Patrick Wood is a leading and critical expert on Sustainable Development, Green Economy, Agenda 21, 2030 Agenda and historic Technocracy. He is the author of Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation (2015) and co-author of Trilaterals Over Washington, Volumes I and II (1978-1980) with the late Antony C. Sutton.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tom Schwing

The founders of Greenpeace might differ from the current EU mouthpiece. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/greenpeace-co-founder-joins-climate-change-skeptics

[…] Read More: Huh? EU Suddenly Declares Natural Gas […]

[…] Huh? EU Suddenly Declares Natural Gas, Nuclear To Be ‘Climate Friendly’ The European Parliament on Wednesday voted not to block a proposed rule that would designate gas and nuclear power plants as “climate-friendly.” The rule will take effect unless 20 of the European Union’s (EU) 27 member states band together to stop it. […]

[…] Huh? EU Suddenly Declares Natural Gas, Nuclear To Be ‘Climate Friendly’ […]

trackback

[…] EU Suddenly Declares Natural Gas, Nuclear To Be ‘Climate Friendly’ […]

Jamie

Natural gas is not environmentally friendly. Water supplies get contaminated, it causes local pollution, in areas where it gets fracked, people end up getting very sick. Blood noses, neurological illness, increased mortality, marked increase general health problems. Nuclear, well that depends how they dispose of the waste and where. Then there is the history and risk of meltdowns, terrorist attacks and wartime attack, which can be devastating. This isn’t even a “green” problem, these are concerns intelligent people need to consider and the greedy fat cats wanting to benefit from this cash cow will be more then happy to feed… Read more »

Elle

We do understand, Jamie. Thanks for expressing your POV.

Last edited 17 days ago by Elle