The article calls Clinton a 'competent technocrat', but a Technocracy nonetheless. Although I would not label her in that context, she is most definitely a leading global champion of Technocracy, Sustainable Development, Green Economy, etc.
This short article says it all: "Technocracy always leads to authoritarian impulses. Always." Eugenics has always had a subtle link to Technocracy, but it is a key element in the total scientific management of society, where only the 'fit' are allowed to have children.
There is a core value of modern Scientism that claims that earth is doomed and the only future for man lies in outer space. Nobody else believes this, but the Technocrats are very happy to use taxpayer money to fund their crackpot ambitions.
Technocracy's dream is to create a scientifically engineered society where every facet of life is micromanaged. How much more personal can you get than specifying what liquids pass through your lips on the way to your stomach?
In rejection of all other 'ideological labels', Technocrats do not recognize that 'Technocrat' IS an ideological label. Dr. Geeta Gopinath is a Harvard economist, and fully understands the economic implications of Technocracy.
Elon Musk says he was sitting in a hot tub when he had the realization that we live in a computer simulation like the Matrix. Now he and other tech billionaires are funding scientists to help us 'break out'.
This is the universal mind of a Technocrat: People are stupid so 'we' must ignore them and do what is 'scientifically right' in our own eyes.
Musk is a prominent Technocrat in Silicon Valley who sees the future of mankind only in outer space, rather than on Earth. Many people have already signed up for a one-way trip to Mars, with zero chance of ever returning.
People are feeling the pressure and control of globalization closing in on them from every side, and don't like it one bit. Yet, the globalists who are promoting globalization are absolutely clueless about why they are being rejected.
The concept of Technocracy is floating higher in global media consciousness, but often in the wrong context. This author limits his definition to "rule by experts" without mention of Technocracy as an economic system.