Technocrats are the natural enemy of politicians, especially if they are not 'useful idiots' for Technocracy. Thus far, Trump doesn't exactly fit this mode, and CIA Technocrats are angry to have to share intel secrets with him.
It is an oxymoron and worse, to combine democracy (which is a political system) and Technocracy (which is an economic system).The 'experts' who demand to run society are simply deluded by this kind of thinking
China's totalitarian regime recently banned original news reporting over the Internet, but this was only one part of a massive crackdown on dissent that rivals the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre. Technocracy is not Communism, but is even more repressive.
Should the Trilateral Commission have this kind of access and influence within the Department of Defense? Given their goal of creating a "New International Economic Order" (which is Technocracy, or Sustainable Development), certainly not.
A pillar of journalism, The Atlantic Magazine is bringing Technocracy into its lexicon, and not a minute to soon! Since Obama was first inaugurated, I have painstakingly detailed Obama's connection to Technocracy and the Trilateral Commission since the day he took office.
This article from a prominent Catholic journal makes this provocative statement : "Despite its medieval ideology, IS is a product of western technocracy; it is run by engineers and jurists."
More writers are honing in on the meme of Technocracy. This article concludes, "Win or lose, Hillary will continue to be a dangerous backer and builder of corporate, globalist technocracy." The writer's concept of Technocracy is accurate albeit incomplete.
Chinese Technocracy was recognized publicly as early as 2002. In a fully expected move, China has now banned Internet news reporting. This is necessary to maintain total control over society.
If Trump and Trumpists ever get a vision to go after Technocracy and Technocrats, America would snap back like a rubber band stretched to its breaking point. But in that battle, they will discover just what kind of enemy we are really up against, and it won't be pretty.
Technocrat alarmists who have doubts about their social engineering project are intending to store a 'backup' of humanity in outer space, just in case something goes terribly wrong. Um, don't you think that these nuts should come clean about the nature of their worries, doubts and fears?