The Economist declares that Trilateral Commission member Stanley Fischer is a Technocrat and that ‘Technocracy is in retreat’ after his retirement as vice-chairman of the Fed. In that The Economist (UK) has long been a mouthpiece for globalization and the Trilateral Commission in particular, their article is designed to be mentally disruptive and misleading on the progress of Technocracy. Truly, Fischer is the consummate Technocrat, but his presence on the world stage only proves that Technocracy is the goal of members of the Trilateral Commission. Are they all of a sudden impotent little puppies? No, they are closer to their endgame of total domination than ever before.
Articles by Patrick Wood
The Carbonn Climate Registry (CCR) was founded in November 2010 at the World Mayors Summit on Climate in Mexico City, but it is operated by the Bonn Center for Local Climate Action and Reporting. The latter is hosted by the ICLEI World Secretariat, also in Bonn.
CSRA’s first listed board of directors member is Michèle Flournoy, a member of the Trilateral Commission. She has been part of the revolving door policy in Washington, having served in Obama’s Defense Department as Under Secretary of Defense for Policy. She co-founded the Center for a New American Security think-tank in 2007, which has at least six senior officials who are also members of the Commission. This is a treasonous cabal of insider Technocrats who are themselves designing the surveillance system of our demise.
Technocrats are dedicated to the ‘science of social engineering’, and that includes direct manipulation of the human herd by putting chemicals into the water supply. This study was edited by Bruce S. McEwen of Rockefeller University. That they would even discus this is a horror reminiscent of Nazi Germany during WWII. Remember, however, that most of America is already drinking fluoride that was imposed without advice and consent from the consuming public.
After repeated assurances from government and military that robotic killing would not be pursued, here it is. Technocrats build because they can, not because it has been thought through.
Scientism underlies both Technocracy and Transhumanism; the latter is to humanity as the former is to society. Without scientism, neither could be explained or justified. Scientism was first clearly defined by the French philosopher, Henri De Saint-Simon.
Ubiquitous surveillance and the imminent threat of discovery has shattered the journalism industry, but journalists have found ways to fight back. The battle between Technocracy and humanity will continue as a war of wits to outfox each other.
Both China and Russia have gone ‘dark’, shutting off major parts of the Internet that insures privacy and access to global content. The clear intent is to limit dissent against their governments, leaving propaganda in its place.
This is the worst possible news for privacy advocates because Apple has chosen to help China, a Technocracy, to censor its citizens. This action follows Apple’s battle with U.S. Intel over encryption of its iPhone, which now seems hollow. Worse, if Apple will cave to China’s political demands, it could cave to anyone else.
All of a sudden, stories about geo-engineering are appearing frequently, floating the idea of cooling the planet by modifying the atmosphere. However, they do not mention that experiments have already been underway for several years. Technocrats don’t believe that they need public approval for any project where the ‘science is settled’.