Moderna’s Top Scientist: ‘We Are Actually Hacking The Software Of Life’

Please Share This Story!
image_pdfimage_print
Pure and simple, this is unvarnished, raw Transhumanism. Moderna CEO says mRNA shots are “rewriting the Genetic Code.” He calls it “information therapy”, and says “We are actually hacking the software of life.” This should be a red alert for every rational American.

Transhumanism is a twisted philosophy that believes in the use of high technology to transform humans into immortal beings. That is, escaping death and living forever. Furthermore, they seek to use genetic engineering to create a new master race of sorts, that will shed all of the “unseemly” characteristics of humans. In just a few short years, Transhumanism has smothered the world against its will and without its consent. Billions of people will be injected with mRNA gene therapy concoctions that will permanently change a persons genetic makeup. ⁃ TN Editor

Dr. Tal Zaks, the chief medical officer at Moderna Inc., explained in a 2017 TED talk how the company’s mRNA vaccine was designed to work.

Over the last 30 years, he said, “we’ve been living this phenomenal digital scientific revolution, and I’m here today to tell you, that we are actually hacking the software of life, and that it’s changing the way we think about prevention and treatment of disease.”

He went on to explain [see video below] that the human body is made up of organs and organs are made up of cells.

“In every cell there’s this thing called messenger RNA or mRNA for short, that transmits the critical information from the DNA in our genes to the protein, which is really the stuff we’re all made out of. This is the critical information that determines what the cell will do. So we think about it as an operating system.

“So if you could change that, if you could introduce a line of code, or change a line of code, it turns out, that has profound implications for everything, from the flu to cancer.”

reported on Feb. 4 that Moderna describes its new vaccine as “a computer operating system” but I was not aware at that time that Zaks had spoken three years ago about this, totally debunking the establishment media’s lie that mRNA vaccines don’t alter your genetic code.

He could not be more clear when he said “We are actually hacking the software of life.”

Zaks stressed that in 2017 his company was working on a vaccine that would not act like any previous vaccine ever created.

“Imagine if instead of giving [the patient] the protein of a virus, we gave them the instructions on how to make the protein, how the body can make its own vaccine,” he said.

Zaks said it took decades to sequence the human genome, which was accomplished in 2003, “And now we can do it in a week.”

He proceeded to reveal, in 2017, his company’s plans to make individual cancer vaccines, tailored to the needs of individual cancer patients, “because every cancer is different.”

Interestingly, one of the most potentially catastrophic side effects of the mRNA vaccine is its interaction with cancer cells. According to a study at New York City-based Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, the mRNA has a tendency to inactivate tumor-suppressing proteins, meaning it can promote the growth of cancer cells.

Both the Moderna and Pfizer injections are experimental mRNA vaccines. The FDA has only granted these injections Emergency Use Authorization [EUA] and they will remain in trials through 2023, yet the government, media and corporations are all promoting them as though they are guaranteed safe.

This systemic deception will, in my opinion, end up being judged in the rear-view mirror of history as one of the most reckless acts of medical treachery ever committed against the human race.

If this so-called vaccine does cause more people to get cancer, think of the possibilities from a purely business point of view.

Based on the predictions of Dr. Zaks, who oversaw the creation of the vaccine now being given to millions of people worldwide, the same Big Pharma companies that could potentially give people cancer with one vaccine could step forward later with another vaccine offering the cure for cancer. If you are the CEO of a mega pharmaceutical who answers to profit-driven Wall Street shareholders, that’s a brilliant strategy!

But is it ethical from a medical point of view? That’s a question nobody is asking.

As I listen to Dr. Zaks lay out the achievements of his company in creating the mRNA vaccine, I cannot help but think of how incredibly arrogant it sounds. That scientists think they can rewrite the genetic code [his words not mine for all you out there who still don’t believe these mRNA vaccines change the genetic code just because some ‘fact checker’ says they don’t], believing they can improve on a person’s God-given genetic makeup is entering dangerous territory. Who’s to say they won’t correct one problem and create something far worse?

Zaks wrapped up his 2017 speech with the following words.

“If you think about what it is we’re trying to do. We’ve taken information and our understanding of that information and how that information is transmitted in a cell, and we’ve taken our understanding of medicine and how to make drugs, and we’re fusing the two. We think of it as information therapy.”

Information therapy. Just like a computer software code.

These scientists truly believe that the human body is nothing more than a machine that can be hacked into and reordered according to some programmer’s instructions.

The same ground-breaking nature of this research that excites some, is what horrifies others.

A person’s genetic makeup is, as Dr. Zak said, “the software of life.”

If this is true, then who should be the ultimate authority over each human being’s genetic software code? If we truly live in a free society, wouldn’t it stand to reason that we would want to have an energetic debate over how to answer that question? Shouldn’t it be the number-one issue being debated in Congress and the media? Instead, nobody is allowed to even ask these questions without being threatened, censored, rebuked, deplatformed. Members of the corporate media who dare broach the question get fired.

Contrary to what some scientists believe, we are not machines. We are human beings with bodies, souls and free wills. Anyone who tries to mandate the acceptance of an experimental gene-altering treatment is going against the international Nuremberg Codes, which require informed consent of any experimental treatment.

Dear readers: Please do not allow your employer, your government, your family, your friends or anyone else to intimidate you, or in any way try to persuade you, to accept this experimental treatment if you do not want it. You are your own health authority, period. If your employer threatens you with termination for rejecting this injection, please contact an attorney. The Rutherford Institute, headed up by civil rights attorney John Whitehead, is one good option. Others include Mat Staver’s Liberty Counsel.

Read full story here…

About the Author

Patrick Wood
Patrick Wood is a leading and critical expert on Sustainable Development, Green Economy, Agenda 21, 2030 Agenda and historic Technocracy. He is the author of Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation (2015) and co-author of Trilaterals Over Washington, Volumes I and II (1978-1980) with the late Antony C. Sutton.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
47 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Christine

These scientists with the great ambitions are the biggest threat on this planet, it’s only comparable with nuclear weapons.. The fact that science is using HUMAN translation apparatus (cap and adenylation signals in order to invade the ribosome) in order to infuse FOREIGN, SYNTHETIC, NON-HUMAN genes into human body, is a crime without ANY comparison, not even with nuclear weapons. I just hope GOD listens and will decide about this erasing of HIS ORIGINAL CREATION.

Petrichor

I think it is possible that those who lack Faith in God and accept these experimental vaccines, made and/or tested with the products of abortion ( a sin that cries to heaven for vengeance) will soon die or become sterile ; those who resisted the vaccines (despite persecution) will survive and multiply to become the godly “faithful remnant” who will inherit the earth and rebuild Western Civilisation based on Christian values.

justsayin

You said, “who resisted the vaccines (despite persecution) will survive and multiply to become the godly “faithful remnant” who will inherit the earth and rebuild Western Civilisation based on Christian values.” I must reject it, it is completely not true and unBiblical! We must expose lies, and what you said was a lie. Taking the vaccine is not a sin though it is completely stupid as the ones receiving it are wholly lacking in discernment and lacking faith in God. The faithful remnant are the Jewish people, their 12 tribes whom the land was promised forever. Christians (Jews and Gentiles… Read more »

Cat

I must expose your fallacies. Judah aka (Jews) are One Tribe only. The Southern Kingdom aka The House of Judah which only consists of The Tribes of Judah, the Tribe of Benjamin and some Levite’s. Their captivity was in Babylon. Most came back to the promised land afterwards and some stayed in Babylon. Judah was the 4th son of Israel aka Jacob and Leah as Scripture tells us this. The faithful Remnant are all who believe and do the will of Son and Father. Unfortunately Scripture tells us that only 1/3 of the House of Judah will be saved. 2/3… Read more »

pamela hankins

TRUE. People need to actually read their Bibles so that they can discern true teachers from false ones. Heb 5:13-14, “For every one that useth milk is unskillful in the word of righteousness: for he is a babe. But strong meat belongeth to them that are of full age, even those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil”.

JESUS1

Or, those of us who are in Christ are looking for that blessed hope and glorious appearing of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ, who shall change our vile bodies and fashion them like unto His Glorious Body according to the working whereby He is able even to subdue all things unto Himself.

Thy Kingdom come thy will be done on Earth as it is in Heaven, is about to become a reality.

Alfred

The only problem is, that their egos are reaching critical mass, and they think that they can play gods and get away with it using untested technology, and having governments mandate they have an unlimited supply of guinea pigs to play with…mainly you and me.

pamela hankins

According to Rev 11:18 God is going to destroy them: “And the nations were angry, and thy wrath is come, and the time of the dead, that they should be judged, and that thou shouldest give reward unto thy servants the prophets, and to the saints, and them that fear thy name, small and great; AND SHOULDEST DESTROY THEM WHICH DESTROY THE EARTH”.

Goodness Shall Prevail

These days i do not know whats worse. (A) The would be tyrants manipulating everyone to take synthetic liquid syringes into their bodies containing DNA manipulation capability. (B) The actual idiots who will believe them and go along with it being totally unaware that they are ultimately empowering an agenda that seeks to enslave them. My conclusion to all of it: Humans have become too domesticated and lost their wildness, too trusting, too easy to herd. They have been conditioned to love their masters like an animal would. Circus and bread, circus and bread. It really is a sad state… Read more »

pamela hankins

The only antidote is to believe God’s Word, and to do that you have to know that “He is, and that He is a rewarder of those that diligently seek Him”, (Heb 11:6). Without that confidence, many will fold when push comes to shove and they are required to give their lives for what they are not absolutely sure about. It’s much easier to make excuses at that point. But, if you know that God’s Word warns us about a great deception that will involve all people (except for His elect, (and they too, if it were possible)) and the… Read more »

S Big

I have several questions I would ask you to address, please. Does the Nuremberg law offer any protection for us against these vaccines? I have read this law protects humans from ever being used as subjects for inhumane testing/experimentation. (The way Hitler subjected Jews, Christians and others to.) Can this law be used against this having to take this vaccine? If this is their objective, as the article says, why do they not know or admit these vaccines will kill many of the population? Dr. Sherri Tenpenny is another person who has studied and researched these vaccines. She explains how… Read more »

Robin Baker

The only governmental authority figure I know of who died of it actually had just been elected, and died before taking his seat… https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/congressman-elect-luke-letlow-dies-after-covid-diagnosis-n1252520 I am very much in harmony with your comment, though. As a retired nurse, I find myself having to explain repeatedly why I’m “willing to risk my and my family’s lives” by refusing the so-called “vaccine”; The ones who ask say that they respect my training in the medical field, and my knowledge of the subject, but at the same time, they think that they are the experts when it comes to this subject, even though… Read more »

Ziva

Not with me you’re not.

david

So this genius writer, presupposes that big pharma want to give people cancer so they can treat it and makes lots of money. Not sure who is more twisted if you believe it… him or big pharma. If this dude had any credibility, he would have contacted Sloan Kettering for the study, and not depending on one unverified article floating around. My take– this guy is a whacko anti vax and who gives a damn if he wrote books. He is a flake.

Goodness shall prevail

You have nowhere near the knowledge and intellectual capacity of gentlemen like Patrick Wood and Leo Hohmann. When those people speak, it is like being enlightened with the fire of knowledge. You on the other hand sound like someone that has been watching too much “bought and paid for TV news anchors” spreading misinformation about people who will outright not take a poisonous shot into their arm. It is you who is the whacko. By the way, Patrick Wood must be a genius writer, People like him saw this tyranny coming down the tracks years and years ago. People should… Read more »

michaelburns

Enlightened? Are you sitting on a toad stool? “You have nowhere near the knowledge and intellectual capacity […]” And you know this…how? “People should listen and be enlightened.” …and keep their mouth shut, and LISTEN and have no INDIVIDUAL opinion. Do you, think people have the right to take a vaccine if, they choose it.? It is obvious that Patrick Wood does not like vaccination in any form, and that is okay, that is his choice, but others have the same choice. And so this is not a black or white issue, but simply a matter of choice and trust.… Read more »

Goodness shall prevail

If you choose to get stabbed at and poked at by a nurse carrying out the orders and dictates of big harma and the agenda that is behind big harma, then by all means feel free to do so, there are no laws protecting you from your naivete. However, there should be laws against big pharma from having no liability from the deaths and injuries caused by their dangerous products. Maybe then could you be made more aware of the high chance that you could be compromising your immunity and health. Govern-minds have made big harma exempt from liability, it… Read more »

Jay Johnson

There is a recent and very real precedent of a mass poisoning of masses of the people, millions, by way of a rushed vaccine to a supposed pandemic. In 1976, in response to the supposed pandemic of Swine Flu, the US rushed a vaccine out. Fairly quickly it was determined that there was a problem. Heightened rates of the autoimmune syndrome Guillain-Barré were seen in those newly vaccinated. Soon, it became clear that the vaccine was compromising many of the vaccinated people’s immune systems. The vaccinations were stopped after about a quarter of the American people had received it–over 50 million… Read more »

STEPHEN

It follows then, surely, that if a corporate entity in pursuit of profits decides to turn us all into something which is fundamentally ALIEN to our planet – that Mother nature will then, surely, erradicate the invader.

Last edited 6 months ago by STEPHEN
Roald Bentzen

All software contains Bugs!

Robin Baker

Good point, and in few words! 😉

Oliver McMahon

We can’t add a line to computer code without breaking something. Genetic code is infinitely more complex than computer code.

Deuce

Funny, because by 2017 every competent mdedical researcher, not blind and deaf from their own hubris, had accepted that we were way beyond our depth. I know one of the most accomplished medical researchers alive on the topic of mRNA and he’d tell you flatly, “we really just don’t know. It never does what we think”. I told him in 2010 that this was because there is higher order signaling. That the DNA double helix is obviously an antenna. He said that was an unfounded idea. Of course it was. Chemists do chemistry. If or when physics comes into play… Read more »

VagabondFrog

This is so true and I am amazed every time I see someone looking at the human body as just a machine you can tweak. These people are dangerously dumb and obtuse. The real intelligence is to see things as a whole and stay humble in front of our own limitations. There is a frame in which we can tweak things until a certain point. Technology is all fun and games except when it comes to bio ethics. There are sacred limits to not cross, which are divine not because of a religious system, but because you just don’t modify… Read more »

Kelli A Gallagher

What a thoughtful comment. God IS science. I am praying for you Deuce that you will find Christ before you die.

John Swanson

People have no idea what this shot will do to them. Bill Gates said its a control system and the second shot is the software to change you.

Shawna

When did bill gates say this? Do you have proof he said this please?

John Swanson

Here is proof that the vaccine is designed to change your DNA.

Lynn

What if you have taken the first dose but decide to not take the second one? Will the first dose still hurt you, or does it take both shots to do the damage? Does anyone with medical knowledge know the answer?

Last edited 6 months ago by Lynn
Paula

Lynn, I’m asking the same question. I’m suppose to get the first shot on 15th at urging if my family but have doubts about going through with it.

Robin Baker

According to the information I’ve been able to find, both doses are mRNA-type, which means that even a single dose can be problematic, unfortunately.

pamela hankins

You’d think that these ‘brilliant’ minds would understand that there is ALWAYS an ‘X’ factor, some pesky little fact that derails your lovely theory.

Raluca

We are part of nature, we invent stuff and we may kill ourselfs doing so.. Part of the plan I guess..

Bernado Gui

Are humans descended from bananas?
The comparison computer-human is already skewed. We do not function on a software basis.
Drug experiments are performed on mices, because humans and mice share more genes than humans and monkeys.
We share 70% of our genes with bananas.

Lei Petchaboon

Odd that the world’s savior bill gates refuses to share the patents for any of his vaccines.

Seems like anyone with altruistic motives would want to destroy the plague that has killed so many.

But, since billy-boy also funds Gain-of-Function research at the Pirbright Institute in England; I guess his refusal to share his panacea shouldn’t surprise us.

Gain-of-Function research (for those who haven’t heard the term) is conducted to increase the lethality & virulence of pathogens. In other words, they manipulate viruses, bacteria, etc that rarely infect humans so that the pathogens can easily do so.

morete

Yes but they can’t stop aging. Barring accidents and suicide, aging is the real cause of death. Diseases just make death happen sooner. Cells get old. They become weak and frail. So people will die of natural causes and the body will just give out. It’s not enough to maintain or regenerate copies of old cells. They must metamorphose back into a preceding life cycle stage or at the very least be held in generative suspension or stasis. Nothing in the Universe goes backwards in time or even stays the same. It’s cyclical. It ages, dies and new life starts… Read more »

Kelli A Gallagher

Simple yet profound.

Bilhawly

These Loons called Scientist, Haven’t a Clue when it come to the long term Effects of Altering a persons DNA. Those that took it may all fall down Dead at best in the Future or develop terrible diseases, or go Bat Crap Crazy or turn into Zombies, to having deformed Children. There is no End to what could happen when you make this type of Modification. Those Chinese Scientist that modified the two Embryos what were birthed to being Girls, well the Scientific Community condemned them for it. Not that same society goes and Modifies most of the Humans on… Read more »

[…] read the rest @ technocracy […]

[…] be needed. However, Moderna’s chief medical officer, Tal Zaks, has described its vaccine as a “computer operating system.” What do Moderna’s internal documents reveal? Can we check to see whether tissues are making […]

[…] be needed. However, Moderna’s chief medical officer, Tal Zaks, has described its vaccine as a “computer operating system.” One approach would be to examine whether tissues are making foreign products such as a […]

[…] be needed. However, Moderna’s chief medical officer, Tal Zaks, has described its vaccine as a “computer operating system.” What do Moderna’s internal documents reveal? Can we check to see whether tissues are making […]

[…] needed. However, Moderna’s chief medical officer, Tal Zaks, has described its vaccine as a “computer operating system.” What do Moderna’s internal documents reveal? Can we check to see whether tissues are making […]

[…] 18, 19, 27 Technocracy News March 23, 2021 […]