Eight years ago, prominent atmospheric scientists and physicists predicted that global cooling would take place over the next few decades, perhaps even bringing a new mini-ice age. They were scoffed at and mocked. Now the record is official: no global warming is taking place, period. This will not deter the global warming cult, however, from crowing about global warming.
Technocrats invented the global warming scam in order to flip the world into Sustainable Development, aka Technocracy. They are losing control of the narrative and may well flip over to global cooling like they did in the 1970s. ⁃ TN Editor
Recently published data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) shows that there has not been global warming for the past eight years. And NASA satellite data reportedly confirms that evidence, showing no global warming for eight years and five months, according to JunkScience’s Steve Milloy. But leftists are quick to warn people against drawing the obvious conclusion that the world isn’t about to become a burning ball of fire.
It's official:
No global warming for 8 years and 5 months, per NASA satellite data.
That's no warming despite ~475 billion tons of CO2 emissions.
Recently published evidence also showed that there was actually a near-record low of major hurricanes in 2022, indicating that weather isn’t getting progressively and exponentially worse globally, despite the climate frenzy of the media and governments. And the Northeast is currently experiencing recordcold in a harsh winter, with Mt. Washington, N.H., yesterday dropping to -45.5 degrees Fahrenheit and -107 degree wind chill.
Axios, which normally loves to scare-monger about global warming, reported today, “Arctic outbreak shatters records in Northeast.” I’m going to go out on a limb — or a glacier — and say that the Northeastern U.S. is definitely not about to suffer devastating effects from “global warming.”
Reuters actually issued a Feb. 3 “fact check” of the above Milloy tweet. The outlet can’t explain away the data, of course, but it hastened to assure readers that the eight years of global cooling are not a trend. Whole decades of such data must occur before we can stop expecting the imminent end of the world. Please fear, people!
“Fact Check-Eight cooler years cannot be extrapolated to draw conclusions on long-term global warming
At least several decades’ worth of data is needed to infer trends in global temperatures, climate experts told Reuters, and while short-term fluctuations might lead to several years that are cooler than a peak year preceding them, the longer-term trend is still upward.
Users online are sharing a post showing graphed temperature data over the past eight years from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) alongside claims that the data mean the Earth is cooling despite ongoing greenhouse gas emissions … The circulating graph shows NOAA “Global Land and Ocean” temperature data from 2015 to 2022, with 2016 as the hottest year on record and yearly fluctuations after that adding up to an average decrease of about one tenth of one degree Celsius over the decade. The graph was published in January.”
Reuters ignores the fact that climate alarmists have in fact been wrong for decades — at least fifty years. But this time the “experts” are sure to be right. Your car is still killing the planet — trust Reuters. I like how we are not allowed to question scientists who extrapolate relatively minor temperature changes to predict the end of humanity and civilization, but we’re not allowed to “extrapolate” years of data to reach an obvious conclusion. Reuters is full of hot air.
Patrick Wood is a leading and critical expert on Sustainable Development, Green Economy, Agenda 21, 2030 Agenda and historic Technocracy. He is the author of Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation (2015) and co-author of Trilaterals Over Washington, Volumes I and II (1978-1980) with the late Antony C. Sutton.
Read the Tweet thread. Lots of politically motivated people pushing global warming in a solar minimum. Ridiculous. It’s actually physically sickening to read their profiteering and gaslighted professionals who do not follow evidence-based science. Their so-called ‘fact-checkers’ are already under my bus tires, so those lies and rebuttals done even count here. Instead, their professionals reel off numbers that have no basis in the historical record and simply make up the rest. These are the same people who used Mann’s so-called expert hockey stick graph as proof of warming–the raw data of which no one can see, not even a… Read more »
I’ve grown tired of trying to present alternative facts on Twitter, because the acolytes of the religion of climate change won’t be swayed – and they have such a devout belief in the doctored data – despite ‘Climate Gate’ and Mann’s manipulation of the data. Gore’s ‘Inconvenient Truth’ should really be applied to the data and those misrepresenting it. What makes me angry is the thought of all the industry .. jobs destroyed in modern, developed societies – such as Germany, and all of the elderly and infirm people who are going to die (‘excess deaths’) in those countries die… Read more »
Greg
February 9, 2023 1:00 pm
It’s risible that we are instructed not to interpret 8 years of cooling as a ‘trend’ yet a flood in Bangladesh, the cleaving of one glacier or a forest fire in California is furnished as ‘self-evident’ proof that global warming is real. Their global warming narrative is the epitome of junk science. Others have described it as a new religion characterised by:- ⁃ A fall from grace (pre-industrial revolution garden of Eden) ⁃ Authoritative Priesthood (IPCC, Gore, Mann) ⁃ Devils (fossil fuels) ⁃ Saints – (Greta) ⁃ Devout followers (climate alarmists) ⁃ Penitents ⁃ Indulgences (offsetting) ⁃ Prophets of Doom… Read more »
Greg
February 9, 2023 6:32 pm
I posted two comments on this article today. One of them as a response to Elle. Both have been removed from this current article. Both were in support of the premise of the article. This has happened before. I find it amazing that a site supposedly dedicated to exploring the encroachment of technocracy and censorship conducts so much censorship itself; censorship at that of someone who wholeheartedly supports the site.I will remove myself from your mailing list and will make no further posts of your articles on social media. Your ‘comments section’ is obviously only there for the sake of… Read more »
Greg – you can do what you want, of course, but one person can only do so much in one 24 hour period. Apparently, you expect more. Why don’t you take the next 8 years of your life and post 6,000 articles on a website read in 187 nations of the world and write three books on Technocracy and Transhumanism? No, you want instant gratification for yourself and blow a gasket when your personal comments are not approved within a time that you deem is appropriate. Your comments have been approved, by the way.
Ian T
February 10, 2023 5:11 am
Of course we really can’t be sure because NOAA’s data is so messed up and poorly QA’d. https://wattsupwiththat.com/2022/07/27/new-surface-stations-report-released-its-worse-than-we-thought/ fortunately we have satellite data that fully disproves the globalist alarmist models. the cmip models all have a CO2 forcing function coefficicient which is simply wrong. and the average of a bunch of wrong models still equals “wrong”. false predictions are not data. the data shows seas rising at 8″ per CENTURY… or maybe we are just sinking. purpose: sequestration of carbon will allow the globalists to control the food supply. plants are already starved for co2 so removing it will slow… Read more »
wendy
February 11, 2023 1:45 am
How did they get the majority of the atmospheric sciences group to go along with this outright farce of manmade global warming? That is the question which eats me alive. My father was a world renowned nuclear physicist who taught us that hard science, truth and proof via the scientific method was omnipotent. Now our academia goes by the woke and lie formula. I don’t get it. Is a big part of it fear, greed, or have we hired morons in our top universities? Probably all three. It is impossible to improve the planet or the human race if we… Read more »
wpDiscuz
[…] Read original article […]
For ACTUAL Science, one should watch Randall Carlson; via YouTube or NO CENSOR HowTube!
[…] From Technocracy News & Trends […]
[…] It’s Official: No Global Warming For Eight Years […]
[…] Source Technocracy News Feb […]
Read the Tweet thread. Lots of politically motivated people pushing global warming in a solar minimum. Ridiculous. It’s actually physically sickening to read their profiteering and gaslighted professionals who do not follow evidence-based science. Their so-called ‘fact-checkers’ are already under my bus tires, so those lies and rebuttals done even count here. Instead, their professionals reel off numbers that have no basis in the historical record and simply make up the rest. These are the same people who used Mann’s so-called expert hockey stick graph as proof of warming–the raw data of which no one can see, not even a… Read more »
I’ve grown tired of trying to present alternative facts on Twitter, because the acolytes of the religion of climate change won’t be swayed – and they have such a devout belief in the doctored data – despite ‘Climate Gate’ and Mann’s manipulation of the data. Gore’s ‘Inconvenient Truth’ should really be applied to the data and those misrepresenting it. What makes me angry is the thought of all the industry .. jobs destroyed in modern, developed societies – such as Germany, and all of the elderly and infirm people who are going to die (‘excess deaths’) in those countries die… Read more »
It’s risible that we are instructed not to interpret 8 years of cooling as a ‘trend’ yet a flood in Bangladesh, the cleaving of one glacier or a forest fire in California is furnished as ‘self-evident’ proof that global warming is real. Their global warming narrative is the epitome of junk science. Others have described it as a new religion characterised by:- ⁃ A fall from grace (pre-industrial revolution garden of Eden) ⁃ Authoritative Priesthood (IPCC, Gore, Mann) ⁃ Devils (fossil fuels) ⁃ Saints – (Greta) ⁃ Devout followers (climate alarmists) ⁃ Penitents ⁃ Indulgences (offsetting) ⁃ Prophets of Doom… Read more »
I posted two comments on this article today. One of them as a response to Elle. Both have been removed from this current article. Both were in support of the premise of the article. This has happened before. I find it amazing that a site supposedly dedicated to exploring the encroachment of technocracy and censorship conducts so much censorship itself; censorship at that of someone who wholeheartedly supports the site.I will remove myself from your mailing list and will make no further posts of your articles on social media. Your ‘comments section’ is obviously only there for the sake of… Read more »
Greg – you can do what you want, of course, but one person can only do so much in one 24 hour period. Apparently, you expect more. Why don’t you take the next 8 years of your life and post 6,000 articles on a website read in 187 nations of the world and write three books on Technocracy and Transhumanism? No, you want instant gratification for yourself and blow a gasket when your personal comments are not approved within a time that you deem is appropriate. Your comments have been approved, by the way.
Of course we really can’t be sure because NOAA’s data is so messed up and poorly QA’d. https://wattsupwiththat.com/2022/07/27/new-surface-stations-report-released-its-worse-than-we-thought/ fortunately we have satellite data that fully disproves the globalist alarmist models. the cmip models all have a CO2 forcing function coefficicient which is simply wrong. and the average of a bunch of wrong models still equals “wrong”. false predictions are not data. the data shows seas rising at 8″ per CENTURY… or maybe we are just sinking. purpose: sequestration of carbon will allow the globalists to control the food supply. plants are already starved for co2 so removing it will slow… Read more »
How did they get the majority of the atmospheric sciences group to go along with this outright farce of manmade global warming? That is the question which eats me alive. My father was a world renowned nuclear physicist who taught us that hard science, truth and proof via the scientific method was omnipotent. Now our academia goes by the woke and lie formula. I don’t get it. Is a big part of it fear, greed, or have we hired morons in our top universities? Probably all three. It is impossible to improve the planet or the human race if we… Read more »
Here we go again:
https://climateball.net/but-da-paws/
See also:
https://andthentheresphysics.wordpress.com/2023/02/02/the-escalator/