Just What Was Henry “Old Friend Of China” Kissinger Doing With Chairman Xi?

© AFP 2023 / CNS
Please Share This Story!
When Trilateral Commission sage Kissinger shows up in unexpected places, we should look closely to see what this 100 year-old snake is up to. This was not an official visit, but remember, it was Kissinger in 1972 who thawed relations with China, which made it possible for Zbigniew Brzezinski to induct them into the modern world in 1976- and subsequently feed them Technocracy’s dogma to build a giant global octopus.

What message could Kissinger have delivered to Xi in private?

Kissinger is the last remaining living legacy of the late David Rockefeller. Kissinger was always known as a “Rockefeller man” dating back to the 1960s. The Rockefellers had a century-long love affair with China and picked it as the perfect launching pad to build a model Technocracy for world domination. Have these goals been lost or is Kissinger merely reminding them of their proper place in the world? ⁃ TN Editor

It was a photo op for the ages: a visibly well-disposed President Xi Jinping receiving centenarian “old friend of China” Henry Kissinger in Beijing.

Mirroring meticulous Chinese attention to protocol, they met at Villa 5 of the Diaoyutai State Guesthouse – exactly where Kissinger first met in person with Zhou Enlai in 1971, preparing Nixon’s 1972 visit to China.

The Mr. Kissinger Goes to Beijing saga was an “unofficial”, individual attempt to try to mend increasingly fractious Sino-American relations. He was not representing the current American administration.

There’s the rub. Everyone involved in geopolitics is aware of the legendary Kissinger formulation: To be the US’s enemy is dangerous, to be the US’s friend is fatal. History abounds in examples, from Japan and South Korea to Germany, France and Ukraine.

As quite a few Chinese scholars privately argued, if reason is to be upheld, and “respecting the wisdom of this 100-years-old diplomat”, Xi and the Politburo should maintain the China-US relation as it is: “icy”.

After all, they reason, being the US’s enemy is dangerous but manageable for a Sovereign Civilizational State like China. So Beijing should keep “the honorable and less perilous status” of being a US enemy.

The World Through Washington’s Eyes

What’s really going on in the back rooms of the current American administration was not reflected by Kissinger’s high-profile peace initiative, but by an extremely combative Edward Luttwak.

Luttwak, 80, may not be as visibly influential as Kissinger, but as a behind the scenes strategist he’s been advising the Pentagon across the spectrum for over five decades. His book on Byzantine Empire strategy, for instance, heavily drawing on top Italian and British sources, is a classic.

Luttwak, a master of deception, reveals precious nuggets in terms of contextualizing current Washington moves. That starts with his assertion that the US – represented by the Biden combo – is itching to do a deal with Russia.

That explains why CIA head William Burns, actually a capable diplomat, called his counterpart, SVR head Sergey Naryshkin (Russian Foreign Intelligence) to sort of straighten things up “because you have something else to worry about which is more unlimited”.

What’s “unlimited”, depicted by Luttwak in a Spenglerian sweep, is Xi Jinping’s drive to “get ready for war”. And if there’s a war, Luttwak claims that “of course” China would lose. That dovetails with the supreme delusion of Straussian neocon psychos across the Beltway.

Luttwak seems not to have understood China’s drive for food self-sufficiency: he qualifies it as a threat. Same for Xi using a “very dangerous” concept, the “rejuvenation of the Chinese people”: that’s “Mussolini stuff”, says Luttwak. “There has to be a war to rejuvenate China”.

The “rejuvenation” concept – actually better translated as “revival” – has been resonating in China circles at least since the overthrow of the Qing dynasty in 1911. It was not coined by Xi. Chinese scholars point out that if you see US troops arriving in Taiwan as “advisors”, you would probably make preparations to fight too.

But Luttwak is on a mission: “This is not America, Europe, Ukraine, Russia. This is about ‘the sole dictator’. There is no China. There is only Xi Jinping,” he insisted.

And Luttwak confirms the EU’s Josep “Garden vs. Jungle” Borrell and European Commission dominatrix Ursula von der Leyen fully support his vision.

Luttwak, in just a few words, actually gives away the whole game: “The Russian Federation, as it is, is not strong enough to contain China as much as we would wish”.

Hence the turn around by the Biden combo to “freeze” the conflict in the Donbass and change the subject. After all, “if that [China] is the threat, you don’t want Russia to fall apart,” Luttwak reasons.

So much for Kissingerian “diplomacy.”

Let’s Declare a “Moral Victory” and Run Away

On Russia, the Kissinger vs. Luttwak confrontation reveals crucial cracks as the Empire faces an existential conflict it never did in the recent past.

The gradual, massive U-turn is already in progress – or at least the semblance of a U turn. US mainstream media will be entirely behind the U turn. And the naïve masses will follow. Luttwak is already voicing their deepest agenda: the real war is on China, and China “will lose”.

At least some non-neocon players around the Biden combo – like Burns – seem to have understood the Empire’s massive strategic blunder of publicly committing to a Forever War, hybrid and otherwise, against Russia on behalf of Kiev.

This would mean, in principle, that Washington can’t just walk away like it did in Vietnam and Afghanistan. Yet Hegemons do enjoy the privilege to walk away: after all they exercise sovereignty, not their vassals. European vassals will be left to rot. Imagine those Baltic chihuahuas declaring war on Russia-China all by themselves.

The off-ramp confirmed by Luttwak implies Washington declaring some sort of “moral victory” in Ukraine – which is already controlled by BlackRock anyway – and then moving the guns towards China.

Yet even that won’t be a cakewalk, because China and the about-to-expand BRICS+ are already attacking the Empire at its foundation: dollar hegemony. Without it, the US itself will have to fund the war on China.

Chinese scholars, off the record, and exercising their millennia-old analytical sweep, observe this may be the last blunder the Empire ever made in its short history.

As one of them summarized it, “the empire has blundered itself to an existential war and, therefore, the last war of the empire. When the end comes, the empire will lie as usual and declare victory, but everyone else will know the truth, especially the vassals.”

And that brings us to former national security adviser Zbigniew “Grand Chessboard” Brzezinski’s 180-degree turn shortly before he died, aligning him today with Kissinger, not Luttwak.

“The Grand Chessboard”, published in 1997, before the 9/11 era, argued that the US should rule over any peer competitor rising in Eurasia. Brzezinski did not live to see the living incarnation of his ultimate nightmare: a Russia-China strategic partnership. But already seven years ago – two years after Maidan in Kiev – at least he understood it was imperative to “realign the global power architecture”.

Destroying the “Rules-Based International Order”

The crucial difference today, compared to seven years ago, is that the US is incapable, per Brzezinski, to “take the lead in realigning the global power architecture in such a way that the violence (…) can be contained without destroying the global order.”

It’s the Russia-China strategic partnership that is taking the lead – followed by the Global Majority – to contain and ultimately destroy the hegemonic “rules-based international order”.

As the indispensable Michael Hudson has summarized it, the ultimate question at this incandescent juncture is “whether economic gains and efficiency will determine world trade, patterns and investment, or whether the post-industrial US/NATO economies will choose to end up looking like the rapidly depopulating and de-industrializing post-Soviet Ukraine and Baltic states or England.”

So is the wet dream of a war on China going to change these geopolitical and geoeconomics imperatives? Give us a -Thucydides – break.

The real war is already on – but certainly not one identified by Kissinger, Brzezinski and much less Luttwak and assorted US neocons. Michael Hudson, once again, summarized it: when it comes to the economy, the US and EU “strategic error of self-isolation from the rest of the world is so massive, so total, that its effects are the equivalent of a world war.”

About the Editor

Patrick Wood
Patrick Wood is a leading and critical expert on Sustainable Development, Green Economy, Agenda 21, 2030 Agenda and historic Technocracy. He is the author of Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation (2015) and co-author of Trilaterals Over Washington, Volumes I and II (1978-1980) with the late Antony C. Sutton.
Notify of

Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Pepe Escobar ist wie Michael Hudson oder auch Peter Koenig und die anderen Autoren von Strategic Culture kluge und belesene Leute. Man muss, wenn man sie zu verstehen sucht, sich dessen bewusst sein, dass sie ihre Intelligenz stets für ihre Seite einsetzen, und das ist: 1. Chinas Regierung, 2. Chinas Regierung, 3. Chinas Regierung …..XNUMX: Putin. D.h. sie argumentieren immer gegen den Feind USA und wollen nicht wahrhaben, dass Rockefeller der Baumeister des heutigen China ist und damit Kissinger genau diese Interessen vertritt. Was slso will Kissinger? Er will der Weltöffentlickeit als scheinbar gewichtiger Mensch Amerikas vorgaukeln, dass man mit… Read more »


And other Henry’s friends. About KommersantKommersant Publishing House is one of the oldest publishing houses and one of the most authoritative and influential media structures in the country. Our main principles are efficiency, reliability, objectivity. 27.05.2023 “It is difficult to imagine a world order in which Russia is not among the major players”Henry Kissinger and different generations of domestic politiciansMay 27 marks the 100th anniversary of the American statesman, former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger. He repeatedly visited the USSR and the Russian Federation and met with Soviet and Russian leaders: Leonid Brezhnev, Mikhail Gorbachev, Vladimir Putin. Henry Kissinger… Read more »


June 21, 2023Countries and affairs: reglobalization is predicted for the world economyBy 2035, the reglobalization process will be completed in the global economy. Such a scenario is given in the June report of the Agency for Strategic Initiatives (ASI) [NGO created by the government], prepared by Dmitry Belousov, an economist at the Center for Macroeconomic Analysis and Short-term Forecasting (Izvestia studied it). The forecast means an end to the acute global crisis and the creation of rules of the game between new centers of power, one of which may be Russia, economists believe.…— The result of the new agreements will… Read more »

[…] Read More: Just What Was Henry “Old Friend Of China” Kissinger Doing With Chairman Xi? […]

[…] Just What Was Henry “Old Friend Of China” Kissinger Doing With Chairman Xi? […]


While the cabal is audacious in its vile power grabs they have always made lots of mistakes. Huge mistakes. Primarily because their world domination objectives are seated in a religious megolamania and with a deluded, psychopathic view of their own self-worth. They do not quite operate on a rational basis of operational efficiency. The early stepping-stones and conquests of the cabal – like the mass homicial usurpations of Russia and China into satanic and nightmarish versions of a brutal communistic hell – have back-fired. They have resulted in those countries organically evolving OUT of that darkness and instead becoming societies… Read more »