After Harris stuck her foot in her mouth, the White House immediately backpedaled and said she meant to say “pollution”, not “population,” It may well have been “pollution” on her teleprompter, but here eyes and mind were trained to think “population.” This means somebody is discussing population reduction behind the scenes and the word got stuck in her mind. Meanwhile, we have documented population control for over 50 years. ⁃ TN Editor
Vice President Kamala Harris mistakenly (?) suggested that one of the goals of investing in clean energy is population reduction.
“When President [Joe] Biden and I took office, we set an ambitious goal … to cut our greenhouse gas emissions in half by 2030 and to reach net-zero emissions by 2050,” Harris told an audience at Coppin State University in Baltimore on Friday.
When we invest in clean energy and electric vehicles and reduce population, more of our children can breathe clean air and drink clean water,” she continued.
According to the official transcript, the 58-year-old Vice President meant to say ‘pollution,’ not ‘population.’
KAMALA HARRIS: “When we invest in clean energy and electric vehicles and reduce population, more of our children can breath clean air and drink clean water.” pic.twitter.com/MbMiDx9Xoc
Ms. Harris spoke at the event to address the Environmental Protection Agency’s $20 billion investment program across two grant competitions under the Biden administration’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund that aims to spark clean energy investments across the country.
After clips of Ms. Harris’s verbal miscue emerged online, social media users and a number of Republican figures seized on the error to suggest the Biden administration was publicly calling to reduce the population in the United States.
Responding to Ms. Harris’ verbal slip-up in a Twitter post, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) asked the vice president what exactly she meant by reducing the population.
“Abortion? Assisted suicide? Or what means are you suggesting to reduce population in order to help public health?” Ms. Greene wrote.
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), meanwhile, warned his followers on Twitter, asking: “Are you the population she wants to reduce?”
“Kamala Harris admits she wants to reduce the population for environmental reasons,” Ohio state Sen. Michael Rull said in a post on Twitter. “That’s not just anti-American. That’s anti-human.”
Tesla CEO Elon Musk also commented on the vice president’s mix-up of the phrase, tweeting: “We need to increase population.”
Kamala just said that “reducing population” is a goal of the climate change movement
Patrick Wood is a leading and critical expert on Sustainable Development, Green Economy, Agenda 21, 2030 Agenda and historic Technocracy. He is the author of Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation (2015) and co-author of Trilaterals Over Washington, Volumes I and II (1978-1980) with the late Antony C. Sutton.
Subscribe
2 Comments
Oldest
NewestMost Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
gold
July 19, 2023 2:22 pm
And… the opposition: for reference Parlamentskaya Gazeta (The Parliamentary Newspaper) is the official weekly publication of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation. Published since 1997. The founders of the newspaper are the State Duma and the Federation Council of the Russian Federation. The publication is the official publisher of federal laws, resolutions, acts and other documents of the Federal Assembly ~ Parlamentskaya Gazeta, 16.05.2023Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Global warming can be stopped by reducing the population~It is possible to stop global warming if population growth slows down within 25-50 years, says Academician of the Russian Academy of… Read more »
Brad booperdo
July 19, 2023 3:34 pm
The only way to achieve their insane emission cuts by their time table is population reduction, I don’t care what anyone says, population reduction is the only way that makes sense. Unless the global controllers want to release their hidden technology from black projects that would put a stop to oil, gas and coal, but they won’t do that, that would disrupt and destroy the current system where they get a lot of their power and make a lot of their money from. So, population reduction it is, wether it be by man made famines, climate manipulation, biotech, etc it… Read more »
And… the opposition: for reference Parlamentskaya Gazeta (The Parliamentary Newspaper) is the official weekly publication of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation. Published since 1997. The founders of the newspaper are the State Duma and the Federation Council of the Russian Federation. The publication is the official publisher of federal laws, resolutions, acts and other documents of the Federal Assembly ~ Parlamentskaya Gazeta, 16.05.2023Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Global warming can be stopped by reducing the population~It is possible to stop global warming if population growth slows down within 25-50 years, says Academician of the Russian Academy of… Read more »
The only way to achieve their insane emission cuts by their time table is population reduction, I don’t care what anyone says, population reduction is the only way that makes sense. Unless the global controllers want to release their hidden technology from black projects that would put a stop to oil, gas and coal, but they won’t do that, that would disrupt and destroy the current system where they get a lot of their power and make a lot of their money from. So, population reduction it is, wether it be by man made famines, climate manipulation, biotech, etc it… Read more »