A Bomb: Last week a lawyer for military personnel spoke about the extraordinary rise in medical conditions that occurred after vaccination against Covid. This is one of the largest and best kept medical datasets in the world, the people in it are mostly young and healthy, and the whistleblowers have signed legal declarations.
The military data suggests most national vaccination databases suffer from gross underreporting of adverse events.
In the World-We-Thought-We-Lived-In, this would have been Frontpage news the next day. Calls should be coming in from all around to pause vaccinations immediately until it can be reviewed.
The three whistleblowers noticed strange patterns in the patients they were treating. They trawled through data on medical billing from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED).
Aside from the [300%] spike in miscarriage diagnoses, there was an almost 300% increase in cancer diagnoses (from a five-year average of 38,700 per year to 114,645 in the first 11 months of 2021). There was also a 1,000% increase in neurological issues, which increased from a baseline average of 82,000 to 863,000.
The event was a five hour hearing held by US Senator Ron Johnson. Lawyer Thomas Renz has been representing clients suing over vaccine mandates and he was on fire. As well as the risks above, there were many conditions with rates far above their long term averages:
- myocardial infarction –269% increase
- Bell’s palsy – 291% increase
- congenital malformations (for children of military personnel) – 156% increase
- female infertility – 471% increase
- pulmonary embolisms – 467% increase
“Our soldiers are being experimented on, injured and sometimes killed…”
*UPDATE: These are not case numbers. These were medical billing items. One person could notch up many billing items for a single condition over the course of a year. What it shows is that — compared to a normal year, or even compared to a pandemic year (2020) — there were 3 to 10 times as many billing items for some conditions.
The increase in medical reports didn’t happen during the first year of Covid, only after the vaccination program was started. In other words, Covid itself didn’t cause this.
Hopefully, for everyone’s sake, the effects will fade with time, especially if people don’t get boosted, or choose a safer vaccine, or an even safer anti-viral.
Senator Ron Johnson….“it must be investigated”, “this is frightening”.
h/t to David E, Old Ozzie, Analitik, Prophet of Boom, and a long while ago, another Ian, Tel, Major Distraction.
Here’s the short 2.5 minute slice:
For people who are vaccinated and may be concerned, bear in mind that many of these conditions are rare events and even three-fold increases will still be rare events. Talk to your doctor, get medical tests, and reduce risks.
Renz points out that the CDC is aware of this data yet tells the public something else.
…on September 28th, when Fauci and others were blaming the unvaccinated and saying this was a “crisis of the unvaxxed” — in actuality their Project Salus DOD data, which is given to the CDC, showed that 71% of new cases were fully vaxxed. And 60% of hospitalizations were also in the fully vaxxed.
“This is corruption at the highest level”
Daniel Horowitz writes in The Blaze:
Whistleblowers share DOD medical data that blows vaccine safety debate wide open
I have spoken to one of the whistleblowers who attests to being gravely concerned with seeing young soldiers with sudden metastatic cancers, auto-immune diseases, and heart and circulatory disorders that have caused many soldiers to drop out of various training programs. “These doctors were motivated to explore DMED data due to the numbers of case increases they were seeing empirically,” said the whistleblower, who served in the military for many years. “Some physicians throughout the force (all branches) have been intimidated by commands not to perform the full spectrum of testing and adhere to the regulations, which implicitly direct full workups for EUA vaccination adverse reactions. It will require other military physicians to step forward and share experiences to fully ascertain the enormity of these allegations and engender an investigation to the fullest extent.”
If these numbers are verified in the upcoming court cases, then absent some massive military insurance fraud or bizarre glitch in the system, it potentially paints a shocking picture of vaccine safety concerns that would indicate that not only were the VAERS safety signals something that should immediately have been followed up on, but they are plagued by woeful underreporting. The military is a defined, finite, and closely controlled and monitored population. They are also overwhelmingly young and healthy. If allegations of neurological, cardio, and cancer concerns surrounding the vaccines are indeed true, the military would be the most revealing place to discover it, and their data is the most reliable and undisputable.
Why didn’t Defense Health Agency speak up?
DMED is quite literally an epidemiological surveillance program designed for the express purpose of detecting surges in illness and injury to make sure the military is combat-ready. It’s about national security even more than public health. Why would the military not have blown the whistle and warned the CDC right away about this data?
How could the blaring and glaring surveillance signals of a lifetime be ignored by the Defense Health Agency (DHA), and how was this not conveyed to the general public?
Why didn’t the FBI or the CIA say something? If foreign national military forces were struggling like this (and presumably some are) we’d hope the intelligence agencies were aware of it.
When it’s the US military and US — surely it’s even more important?
Senator Johnson has warned the DOD not to delete any of the data, but perhaps games are already being played. From the video above, Leigh Dundas has harsh words.
Leigh Dundas, Human Rights attorney working with Thomas Renz
I would contend senator that there is not just a “suspicion”. In August there were 1239 cases and now its down to 307. In January 2022 there were 176 cases and magically they are now down to 17. There is a word for that and it’s not “suspicious”.
We have in the military the single best dataset that exists because we have baselines…
Acute disease [item numbers] across all categories in all the five years leading up to this was 1.7 million… … it jumped to 22 million.
They mandated a vaccine for the military when they had only lost 12 service members total to the disease. These numbers indicate something is drastically wrong.
The numbers being referred to are often medical billing items or diagnoses codes, not people.
It could be the biggest medical scandal of all times, except for that other one where they suppress and ban life-saving drugs…
The objective is to destroy the USA/US by any means necessary. The enemies of this land are foreign and domestic, to include the Vatican/Illuminati/Masonic cartel and those they’ve placed in positions of power at all levels.
Weakening or destroying the military goes a very long way to getting the above done.
a bunch of stupid kids with way too much money want to be our overlords. if they succeed, even soros will be dismissed as an old dog and thanked for his efforts to undermine humanity by being dismissed from the planet. the above mentioned stupid kids are sociopathic culls and can be given no quarter and no support.
“The military data suggests most national vaccination databases suffer from gross underreporting of adverse events.” Once and for all: ‹data›, literally ‘given things’, is the perfect participle passive neuter PLURAL nominative (as above, but also vocative and accusative, when these cases are required) of the verb ‹do› ‘I give’. The sentence should therefore begin “The military data suggest”, much better followed in this formal context by a “that”. Further, if only one of the data is doing the suggesting, the sentence should begin “One military datum[ singular form of data] suggests that […]” or “One of the military data suggests… Read more »
get outa here. you have allowed your book learning to craze you and render you nonviable.
I heard some of the testimony. I wrote a letter to the editor, they actually printed it. We need to get message out, people are sleeping they need to wake up! Write letters in your local papers and get the word out. This was not carried in the mainstream media; most don’t even know about it.
I’m agape that anyone could think the numbers are in any way compromised. And it’s mind-blowing that anyone in this country could think these kill-shots, characterized as so-called vaccines, being forced onto the public via POTUS’ mandates is anything but murdering humanity and crippling the US Military. WAKE UP!! There reason for this lack of cognizance is all too clear. This data is proof that a murder-for-profit scheme has been playing out inside their database. Anyone who “believes” the current bullshit propaganda will not go there because it clearly means–THEIR COUNTRY IS TRYING TO MURDER THEM SUPPORTED BY THE JOINT… Read more »
It doesn’t seem to matter how many people suffer or die in spite of taking those covid jabs. Politicians continue to push it. As far as I’m concerned. Politicians are happy with the vaccine injuries and related deaths.
[…] 71% of new cases were fully vaxxed. And 60% of hospitalizations were also in the fully vaxxed. READ HERE THE SHOCKING […]
[…] +319% auf 1.470, Guillain-Barre-Syndrom +250% auf 3.635, Immundefekte +275% auf 3.172 Fälle. (Quelle und […]
[…] Bei der US-Armee gibt es ein militäreigenes Gesundheits-Beobachtungssystem, in dem alle medizinischen Vorgänge registriert werden. Es herrscht dort Impfpflicht. Mithin kann man davon ausgehen, dass in diesem System auch alle gravierenden Impffolgen erfasst werden. Passive Meldesysteme für Impffolgen (wie etwa das der WHO oder des PEI) sind ungenau. Es werden vielleicht nur fünf Prozent der Nebenwirkungen gemeldet – und dann auch nur die, bei denen der Zusammenhang zeitlich eng und damit offensichtlich ist. Ein Wistleblower hat kürzlich Daten aus diesem System veröffentlicht. Demnach ist die Zahl von Fehlgeburten in den ersten elf Monaten von 2021 gegenüber der Zeit vor… Read more »
Presumption, Assumption and Hearsay are legal terms used in law courts.
When you wear this bracelet a doctor cannot assume you consented to this mRNA bio-weapon injection.
If you do not say NO or YES then legally an assumption of a consenting yes is assumed, and you will be injected.
Have courage, to say NO with this Bracelet, this will stand up in court and they can be held responsible or they respected your non consent and did not inject you. ♥️🙏
#mRNAinjuries #VaccineDeaths
https://mrnaalert.com