Congressional Report Details Blocking Sunlight To Save The Planet From ‘Global Warming’

Please Share This Story!
After years of dishing out abuse and accusations to those who sounded the alarm on geoengineering, the Federal government itself has published a major report detailing ways to block the sun to mitigate non-existent “global warming”. This Technocrat initiative seeks to shrink economic activity by controlling energy, food and water. It will not save the world, but rather will destroy it.

The accompanying White House statement was quick to distance itself from the eye-opening report, which in political terms means they are actually seriously considering it.

“Importantly, this report does not signify any change in policy or activity by the Biden-Harris Administration, which remains focused on reducing emissions, increasing resilience, advancing environmental justice, and achieving true energy security. Release of this report fulfills a Congressional mandate, and there are no plans underway to establish a comprehensive research program focused on solar radiation modification.”¬†‚ĀÉ TN Editor

Despite the European Commission’s recent warning that large-scale interventions such as solar engineering to reverse ‘climate change’ could have “unintended consequences,” the White House published a new report Friday indicating that the Biden administration wants to manipulate planetary systems to block the sunlight to save the planet.

The¬†congressionally mandated report¬†released by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy shows the Biden administration is very eager to explore “geoengineering” methods to block sunlight because they allege the planet is burning and there’s an imminent climate crisis that will destroy the world.

“A program of research into the scientific and societal implications of solar radiation modification (SRM) would enable better-informed decisions about the potential risks and benefits of SRM as a component of climate policy, alongside the foundational elements of greenhouse gas emissions mitigation and adaptation,” the White House report said.¬†

The report continued, “SRM offers the possibility of cooling the planet significantly on a timescale of a few years.”¬†

In a¬†statement, the White House said, “There are no plans underway to establish a comprehensive research program focused on solar radiation modification.”

There is no official government policy that was attached to the report. The administration noted Congress ordered the report.

The report was released one day after the European Commission outlined the potential risks and “unintended consequences” of manipulating planetary systems to fight global warming.

The commission warned:

In the context of accelerated global warming, deliberate large-scale intervention in the Earth’s natural systems (referred to as “geoengineering”), such as solar radiation modification, is attracting more attention. However, the risks, impacts and unintended consequences that these technologies pose are poorly understood, and necessary rules, procedures and institutions have not been developed.¬†

Some of these risks include:

These technologies introduce new risks to people and ecosystems, while they could also increase power imbalances between nations, spark conflicts and raises a myriad of ethical, legal, governance and political issues. 

Blocking the sun’s rays globally with artificial particles in the name of ‘climate change’ is gaining traction. However, there’s too much risk involved that could possibly harm biodiversity and agriculture on a global scale. The fact that this technology could alter global weather patterns and the Biden administration wants to explore it — is frightening.

… and Mr. Burns from the animated television series The Simpsons tried this.

Read full story here…

About the Editor

Patrick Wood
Patrick Wood is a leading and critical expert on Sustainable Development, Green Economy, Agenda 21, 2030 Agenda and historic Technocracy. He is the author of Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation (2015) and co-author of Trilaterals Over Washington, Volumes I and II (1978-1980) with the late Antony C. Sutton.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Kevin G

I believe they will use their “Data” collected from the “wildfires” to show that there has been a significant cooling effect and use that “data” to put foward to the masses and justify their “spraying” agenda to block sunlight.

Goalive

Also wenn ich lese, dass die EU vor etwas warnt, dann weiss ich
1. Sie beabsichtigt wieder die Anstossung von aufgebladenen Projekten mit unfähigen Universitätsabsolventinnen
https://germany.representation.ec.europa.eu/news/sicherheitsrisiko-klimawandel-borrell-und-timmermans-dringen-auf-ganzheitlichen-ansatz-2023-06-28_de

2. Will selber machen, wovor sie warnt ist aber noch nicht so weit
https://www.nzz.ch/wissenschaft/climate-engineering-ethische-bedenken-gegen-scopex-experiment-ld.1560141

3. Braucht einen Verst√§rker f√ľrs Klimawandelnarrativ (daf√ľr ist alles recht – siehe Kontext der zitierten Mitteilung) und

4. Bereitet den Schuldigen woanders vor, wenn die eigenen Versuche schief gehen oder auffliegen (analog: an Impfsch√§den/-toten sind Das Virus, die Klimaerw√§rmung, die Affenpocken, Putin …. schuld. Genauso wird es hier angelegt: Klima-Sicherheitsnexus. Jaja.

Goalive

5. und wom√∂glich am wichtigsten: Guterres plant schon lange, die Sicherheitsfragen aus dem Sicherheitsrat herauszul√∂sen und auf die gesamte UN – also auf sich und seine Hinterm√§nner – zu √ľbertragen. Ein Sicherheits Klima Nexus bei der UN-Dependance ist da ein geschickter Schachzug. Putin muss dann nicht mehr nur den Spuelverderber i.S. Wokismus spielen, sondern steht auch noch als Klimasch√§dling da, wenn er sich verweigert. Das gilt zwar auch f√ľr China, aber die chinesen spielen kein Schach, sondern Go. Sie platzieren ihre Leute an strategisch geschickten Stellen, z.B. nahe an Guterres (siehe HLAB). Was China am Ende wirklich gewollt haben wird,… Read more »

Goalive

Ich vergass: Das Projekt GENIE GeoEngineering and NegatIve Emissions pathways in Europe L√§uft schon seit 2021 und soll 2027 abschliessen https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/951542/de Geoengineering technologies, such as solar radiation management (SRM), and negative emissions technologies, such as greenhouse gas removal (GGR), are emerging options to address climate change. This project will investigate the environmental, technical, social, legal, and policy dimensions of GGR and SRM. We provide an urgently needed interdisciplinary and holistic perspective of these technologies in order to understand conditions under which they might be deployed at scale. Our meta-analytical framework integrates insights from social science, engineering and physical science disciplines… Read more »

peter

I’m on the right but this is where I part company with my fellow conservatives. Isn’t it common sense that 100s of millions of cars on the road today and 10,000s of power plants that didn’t exist 100 to 150 years ago would have an effect. People here in the upper mid west are noticing that the climate is getting warmer. So, depending on the exact nature of the plan I’d be in favor of it.

Goalive

Es ist wie mit Impfungen: das Heilmittel sollte nicht gef√§hrlicher sein als die Krankheit. DAS sollte man zuvor eingehend gepr√ľft haben. Zur eingehenden Pr√ľfung geh√∂rt, dass man nicht nur Ahnungen und Vermutungen hat, sondern Ursachen erforscht und denen mit anderen Theorien zuh√∂rt und sie sorgf√§ltig pr√ľft. Diese ‘egal, was es ist, macht es irgendwie weg’ ist die klassische Konsumhaltung, die nicht dar√ľber nachdenken will. Wenn Sie also ernsthaft in Ihrer Ansicht sind, m√ľssten Sie die von Ihnen angenommenen Ursachen – Kraftwerke und Autos – bek√§mpfen, anstatt auf gef√§hrliche Zauberkunstst√ľcke zu hoffen, oder nicht? Nein, Sie m√∂chten weitermachen mit Verhalten, das… Read more »

Letty

You part company by going total idiot?

Goalive

Eines der gewaltigsten Probleme des Widerstands ist, dass er meint, diese Leute w√ľrden etwas verbergen und man m√ľsse ihnen die Wahrheit entreissen. Aber das ist falsch. Eine open conspiracy verbirgt NICHTS, sie h√§ngst es nur nicht an die grosse Glocke. Wenn ich mir die Projekte von ESFRI, der eirop√§ischen Forschungsinitiative, durchsehe, dann finde ich dort alles projektiert und dokumentiert, wor√ľber Leute wie Barrie Trower reden. Nur: es kennt keiner ESFRI, keiner schaut hin, und wenn, dann sieht man nur die Soziothemen und √ľbersieht, dass sie l√§ngst mit Energie, Plasma und Laser experimentiern in der deutlichen Absicht, nicht mehr nur in… Read more »

Alfred

LOL. They are strong arming people to go solar, and now they want to dim the sun…..hmmm

[…] Congressional Report Details Blocking Sunlight To Save The Planet From ‘Global Warming’ […]