Demonizing Cattle Is Emerging As A Major Climate Change Objective

Please Share This Story!

Busybody environmentalists who know little to nothing about agriculture make statements like this: “The issue for agriculture is identifying the actors and creating levers for change.” It’s all about forcing you to change your behavior in a way that suits them!  TN Editor

The hamburgers and cheese that come from U.S. cattle may be favorite fare at many summer cookouts, but the methane the same cows produce is significantly less appetizing.

That’s especially the case for sustainable investors looking for a low-emission place to park their cash. “Enteric fermentation,” or livestock’s digestive process, accounts for 22 percent of all U.S. methane emissions, and the manure they produce makes up 8 percent more, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

And although agriculture is a growing industry as the world looks to feed its swelling population, some investors are reluctant to support a sector with such a hefty methane footprint.

“There are a lot of factors or buckets that go into agricultural emissions, but livestock tends to be one of the largest focuses,” said David Nicola, portfolio manager of the Gratitude Railroad Farmland Fund, which launched this week and is targeting $40 million in capital commitments focused on regenerative agriculture.

It’s also an issue for Michael Landymore, a senior portfolio manager at Impax Asset Management responsible for the firm’s food and agriculture strategy. “We tend not to invest in companies that are solely focused on growing livestock,” he said in an interview Wednesday.

Methane, like carbon, is a greenhouse gas, but methane’s global warming impact per molecule is 25 times greater than carbon’s, according to the EPA.

In June, scientists from the Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research found that the agricultural sector must reduce non-CO2 emissions by 1 gigatonne per year by 2030 if it’s going to help meet the two degree limit on increases in global temperature required by last year’s United Nations climate agreement in Paris. Almost 130 countries that arrived in Paris last year to agree on emissions reductions included agriculture in climate change mitigation targets, according to CGIAR.

But while many agree lower emissions are an important goal for the livestock industry, just how they get there is still up for debate. It doesn’t help that there isn’t even a uniform way to measure cow-produced emissions.

For meat producers, “monitoring greenhouse gas emissions from cattle is challenging as there are more than 700,000 cow-calf stocker ranches in the U.S.” beef supply chain, Cargill Inc. spokesman Michael Martin said in an e-mail.

Isolating the impact of direct livestock emissions versus indirect emissions such as fertilizer, crop production, and transport for animal feed is also a challenge, companies and investors say. “The issue for agriculture is identifying the actors and creating levers for change,” Cynthia Simon, senior manager of investor initiatives at CDP, a not-for profit focused on corporate carbon and water measurement, said in an e-mail.

Read full story here...

Join our mailing list!

4 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
4 Comment authors
KimAnneEarlwKathy levesque Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Kathy levesque
Kathy levesque

Screw the Paris “agreement” it is illegal and has not been ratified.


Gonna have to kill of all the cattle in any form, not to mention the buffalo and all the hoofed animals on the plains of Africa and the beasts of burden in the orien such as water buffalo and oxen..


Grow grass in huge greenhouses, rotate the cattle through them and use their methane for part of the power needed to keep it cool while the cattle are inside, grazing. Use windmills for the rest. Fertilize alfalfa fields with their manure, after it’s been sterilized and deodorizer, to grow winter fodder and harvest the methane from the silage to keep barns warm in winter. Not rocket surgery.


It’s kind of funny how the U.N. just got done saying to raise the price on meat until it’s unaffordable. They want to put the ranchers out of business alongside the coal miners and when they do, what will you have? A lot of out of work people, including business owners, and then hit up the oil drillers and shut them down as well as other sectors of the economy and we come up with 3rd world conditions. Like in Africa and other 3rd world places, hunger, starvation, disease, eating babies and children, no doctors, ruled under a dictatorship, no… Read more »