Poll: Majority Supports GMO Research For Human/Animal Hybrids

Please Share This Story!
image_pdfimage_print
When animals are viewed on the same value level as humans, there is no ethical problem in interchanging DNA genetic material between them. The overriding problem is that transhuman scientists believe the world of genetics is their private playpen to do what they wish.  ⁃ TN Editor

Human-animal chimeric embryos—organisms created using cells from two or more species—have the potential to change how researchers study disease and generate organs and tissues for human transplants. One day, scientists have proposed, it may be possible for someone with, say, pancreatic cancer to have their stem cells injected into a modified swine embryo lacking its own pancreas so it can grow the human organ for donation.

Already, human-animal chimeric embryos (HACEs) have been created using human cells injected into pigs, sheep, micerats, and monkeys, although none in the US have been brought to term. In fact, their very existence is ethically contentious. What happens, for example, if scientists were to grow a human brain in an animal, blurring the line between species?

In response to ethical, social, and legal concerns, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) issued a moratorium on funding for HACE research in 2015 pending the development of a new set of regulatory guidelines. While research continues in other countries—and even in the US, through collaborations with foreign researchers and private funding—the NIH has yet to reverse its decision, despite previous announcements that it would do so.

To gauge the American public’s support for HACE research, Francis Shen, a professor of law at the University of Minnesota, recreated two recent surveys carried out in Japan, where many of the world’s HACE studies are done. In those surveys, Shen’s colleagues found that the majority of the Japanese public supported the use of HACEs, although their feelings varied depending on the type of organ or tissue being grown. “We thought, ‘Boy, it’d be really interesting to see if the American public thinks about things the same way,’” Shen tells The Scientist.

Shen’s team directly translated the Japanese surveys into English, asking 430 participants to rate their support for each of the three steps involved in producing an organ using HACE technology: the insertion of human stem cells into an animal embryo, the transplanting of the embryo into a surrogate, and the harvesting of the resulting organ for use in a human. As before, they gauged people’s reactions to organ and tissue types, including skin, liver, blood, heart, brain, and gametes.

The Scientist: What can we do with HACEs, or what are we hoping to do with them?

Francis Shen: Organ transplantation is a major goal, and that would be a major breakthrough. When I describe [HACEs] to . . . colleagues who maybe haven’t heard of them before, I talk about organ transplantation. And they understand that, yes, if you grow an organ from your own cells, it makes intuitive sense that your body might be more receptive.

I think there are also a large number of applications that fall broadly under regenerative medicine. One is to better understand the mechanisms of disease and organ function. There’s basic science advances to be achieved there. And then there are applied clinical advances and improvements in treatment across a wide range of diseases and disorders. We can develop better interventions, pharmacological and otherwise. The techniques are not just about improving organ donation. There are also a number of ways, through both basic and applied science, this work can really improve our knowledge and therefore response to any number of diseases and disorders.

TS: What did your survey tell you about the American public’s thoughts on human-animal chimeric embryos?

FS: One of the main findings was that there seems to be very broad support, even broader than in the Japanese public, for the different steps of HACE research. Support was 59 percent, so a strong majority, support all three steps, including the returning of the organ into a human.

Second was that there are some differences across subgroups in the public. One thing that we thought was interesting is that, although lower, in some instances the support of those who are politically conservative was still quite strong . . . suggesting that this type of stem cell research—using [induced pluripotent stem] cells and not embryonic stem cells harvested from a fetus—perhaps could be more politically palatable.

Read full story here…

Join our mailing list!


About the Author

Patrick Wood
Patrick Wood is a leading and critical expert on Sustainable Development, Green Economy, Agenda 21, 2030 Agenda and historic Technocracy. He is the author of Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation (2015) and co-author of Trilaterals Over Washington, Volumes I and II (1978-1980) with the late Antony C. Sutton.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Sharon W.

WE live in an age of deception and deceivers, magic tricks and magicians. Why should we trust these polls when they can be easily manipulated and skewed to purport a chosen narrative?

[…] Read More:  Majority Supports GMO Research For Human/Animal Hybrids […]

Char

Evil and so are any suggestions regarding this “science”. Read the bible. Heaven help us!

Dave Simmons

I don’t believe that survey at all.

Dave Simmons

I don’t believe that survey at all.
What does the Bible say about the angels who refused to keep their designated positions and slept with the daughters of men.
That was such a heinous sin that God cast them into chains of everlasting darkness immediately.
And their offspring were so evil that God destroyed them all in the flood.

James Reinhart

Humanity is finished. If we cannot share the earth with the living creatures around us and treat everything as if we are our own little gods in our own little minds no matter what level of depravity creating fear, death, blood lust and destruction of that which we should share the world’s abundance and plan for the future of all living things and the land we live in, we, the two legged parasites need to exit.

James Reinhart

Humanity need to experience the other side of the slaughterhouse and corporate farming. Perhaps then some may get a clue as to what we have done. At least Carlin understood we turned this beautiful and bountiful western hemisphere into a sewage and meaningless food joint always anticipating the next meaningless experience.