FBI, DOJ Perilously Close To Criminalizing Free Speech

Wikipedia
Please Share This Story!
image_pdfimage_print
If this prosecution moves forward, it will mark the watershed of criminalized free speech in America. The government decides what is harmful speech, not based on breaking actual laws, and the FBI shows up at your door to arrest you. This madness must stop. ⁃ TN Editor

We have all shared this unsettling premonition that the attack on free speech is not just coming from Big Tech with the threat of censorship, but from the government backed by criminal prosecution. We are watching the government arrest hundreds of people not just for violence but for trespassing and negligible crimes at the Capitol when many of them were let into the building by the police. We are seeing the billboards and technology being used to hunt people down, as the most violent Antifa rioters are never arrested. No, this crackdown is not being driven by a concern for security and a sense of justice.

Well, now it’s confirmed that the government itself is rapidly headed toward criminalizing the speech of Trump supporters. The government is treating Antifa’s violence like speech and our speech like violence. What starts with bad behavior by Trump supporters (while ignoring what the other side does) will not end there.

Yesterday, a bizarre headline from the Justice Department’s Office of Public affairs caught my attention and raised the ire of many conservatives. “Social Media Influencer Charged with Election Interference Stemming from Voter Disinformation Campaign,” read the headline of a press release from the DOJ’s Eastern District of New York. That seemed odd to me because I’ve never seen such a vague and intangible charge after years of sifting through daily press releases from U.S. attorneys about espionage, trade theft, and gang activity. As I read further, my worst suspicions were confirmed.

“A Florida man was arrested this morning on charges of conspiring with others in advance of the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election to use various social media platforms to disseminate misinformation designed to deprive individuals of their constitutional right to vote.”

Wow, that sounds interesting. So the DOJ is finally going after election fraud? Did this guy throw out ballots or engage in mail-in fraud like endless witnesses said in sworn affidavits and in testimony before legislatures? No, the DOJ is not interested in tangible fraud that involves an action; in fact, it is investigating any DOJ official who might have sought to investigate such fraud. It only prosecutes speech.

Douglass Mackey, aka Ricky Vaughn, 31, of West Palm Beach was taken into custody and charged with having “exploited a social media platform to infringe one the of most basic and sacred rights guaranteed by the Constitution: the right to vote,” according to Nicholas L. McQuaid, Acting Assistant Attorney General of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division.

Again, I was confused how someone can use their own speech to infringe upon the right of a voter and actually succeed in stealing a vote.

After several paragraphs of DOJ officials bloviating about constitutional rights to vote, they finally announced his crime.

As alleged in the complaint, between September 2016 and November 2016, in the lead up to the Nov. 8, 2016, U.S. Presidential Election, Mackey conspired with others to use social media platforms, including Twitter, to disseminate fraudulent messages designed to encourage supporters of one of the presidential candidates (the “Candidate”) to “vote” via text message or social media, a legally invalid method of voting.

Boy, is that a mouthful! This standard would basically rope in half the country. The other half of the country always believes everything the other side is putting out is false information that is extremely dangerous. We’d all be in jail.

How exactly did the person engage in fraud?

For example, on Nov. 1, 2016, Mackey allegedly tweeted an image that featured an African American woman standing in front of an “African Americans for [the Candidate]” sign. The image included the following text: “Avoid the Line. Vote from Home. Text ‘[Candidate’s first name]’ to 59925[.] Vote for [the Candidate] and be a part of history.” The fine print at the bottom of the image stated: “Must be 18 or older to vote. One vote per person. Must be a legal citizen of the United States. Voting by text not available in Guam, Puerto Rico, Alaska or Hawaii. Paid for by [Candidate] for President 2016.”

The tweet included the typed hashtags “#Go [Candidate]” and another slogan frequently used by the Candidate. On or about and before Election Day 2016, at least 4,900 unique telephone numbers texted “[Candidate’s first name]” or some derivative to the 59925 text number, which was used in multiple deceptive campaign images tweeted by the defendant and his co-conspirators.

Folks, this is very scary. No, not the alleged crime, but that the feds are going after such behavior while ignoring sworn allegations of mass fraud. While what is alleged appears to be mean and spiteful, at the end of the day, there is no way to actually steal a vote with this subterfuge. Not unless someone thought that, based on a random internet tweet, they could vote via text, and without verifying anything thereafter, would have sent their text and then stayed home. By this standard, every governor who violated election law and actually facilitated the casting of ballots not pursuant to law should be in jail.

There are some really distasteful ways people use their freedom of speech – sometimes in a serious way or sometimes in a joking way – but the First Amendment was not written to protect benign speech. To arrest only one side of the divide for social media memes at a time when officials are letting cities burn is very concerning. And it opens a very slippery slope for the government to prosecute people for saying anything that the government believes is harmful.

Is it that hard to envision an FBI agent knocking on your door and saying, “You just wrote information telling people masks don’t work and to stop wearing them. You are engaging in fraud and are an accessory to murder!”

Read full story here…

About the Author

Patrick Wood
Patrick Wood is a leading and critical expert on Sustainable Development, Green Economy, Agenda 21, 2030 Agenda and historic Technocracy. He is the author of Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation (2015) and co-author of Trilaterals Over Washington, Volumes I and II (1978-1980) with the late Antony C. Sutton.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Larry

There are a lot more gun owners than FBI.I don’t think they would try it.

James Reinhart

We are down to free speech zones, can only address grievances for 5 minutes or less in front of any level of government including city and town halls, there are already hate speech laws against certain groups regardless if it is the truth and even with overwhelming facts. The Bill of Rights is long dead. US went into receivership in 1933 during the banking holiday and is part of the congressional record making all of the constitution irrelevant (which actually goes back to initial bankruptcy of 1871. Look up the Bankruptcy of the United States, US Congressional Record, March 17,… Read more »

Alfred

Unfortunately, now-a-days we would be considered a domestic terrorist for saying these things. Years ago, we would have received here, here’s, and applause. Now, for even thinking such things, is considered insurrection, treason, etc., we live in an upside down America now, where even to think our rulers do not have the divine right of deciding what is, and what is not free speech, to be seditious They will use such designs to disarm us and restrict our rights, until the only rights they will leave us with…is the right to remain silent.

Patricia P Tursi, PhD.

I recall the trial of Larry Flint. I didn’t like or approve of him, but I watched the trial of this porn king and decided it was appropriate that this be heard because the first amendment is the basis of our freedom. Take that away and you are in a dictatorship. I do draw the line on child porn because they are developed and mature to make a decision and need to be protected.

[…] If this prosecution moves forward, it will mark the watershed of criminalized free speech in America. The government decides what is harmful speech, not based on breaking actual laws, and the FBI shows up at your door to arrest you. This madness must stop. ⁃ TN EditorRead the full article from technocracy.news. […]

James Reinhart

Henry Ford almost lost his life, family and of course the death of the company for pointing who and what was making money for the US and how. McFadden was assassinated while the case against the Federal Reserve is still open https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/mcfadden-act Huey Long also lost his life trying to expose the corruption that was the Bankers and the treason of the US “government”. Trilaterals? Eugenics. Look at who and what was written about Eugenics in the US back since the mid to late 1800s through today, now the HastingsCenter.org Teddy Roosevelt was all for culling the population as a… Read more »

Alfred

Big Tech IS the Government

[…] Read more: FBI, DOJ Perilously Close To Criminalizing Free Speech […]