Dr. Tim Ball Crushes Climate Change: The Biggest Deception in History


With a 50-year academic career focusing on Historical Climatology, Dr. Tim Ball is uniquely qualified to address man-made climate change, and he demonstrates that it is a flat-out hoax. Thinking people everywhere should get multiple copies of this book and hand them out to everyone they know.  TN Editor

President Trump was correct to withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement. He could have explained that the science was premeditated and deliberately orchestrated to demonize CO2 for a political agenda. Wisely, he simply explained that it was a bad deal for the United States because it gave a competitive economic edge to other nations, especially China. A majority of Americans think he was wrong, but more would disagree if he got lost in the complexities of the science. I speak from experience having taught a Science credit course for 25 years for the student population that mirrors society with 80 percent of them being Arts students. Promoters of what is called anthropogenic global warming (AGW) knew most people do not understand the science and exploited it.

Dr. Tim BallThe plants need more atmospheric CO2 not less. Current levels of 400 parts per million (ppm) are close to the lowest levels in 600 million years. This contradicts what the world was told by people using the claim that human production of  CO2 was causing global warming. They don’t know the UN agency, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), established to examine human-caused global warming, were limited to only studying human causes by the definition they were given by Article 1 of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). It is impossible to identify the human cause without understanding and including natural causes. Few know that CO2 is only 4 percent of the total greenhouse gases. They assume that a CO2 increase causes a temperature increase. It doesn’t, in every record the temperature increases before CO2. The only place where a CO2 increase causes a temperature increase is in the computer models of the IPCC. This partly explains why every single temperature forecast (they call them projections) the IPCC made since 1990 was wrong. If your forecast is wrong, your science is wrong.

I studied weather as aircrew with the Canadian Air Force, including five years of search and rescue in Arctic Canada. After the Air Force, I went to university to study weather and climate, culminating in a Ph.D., in Historical Climatology from the University of London, England. When I began in the late 1960s global cooling was the consensus. I was as opposed to the prediction that it would continue cooling to a mini-Ice Age, as I later was to the runaway AGW claim. I knew from creating and studying long-term records that climate changes all the time and are larger and more frequent than most know. I also knew changes in CO2 were not the cause.

The Club of Rome (COR), formed in 1968, decided that the world was overpopulated and expanded the Malthusian idea that the population would outgrow the food supply to all resources, especially the developed nations. COR member Maurice Strong told Elaine Dewar in her book Cloak of Green that the problem for the planet were the industrialized nations and it was everybody’s duty to shut them down. Dewar asked Strong if he planned to seek political office. He effectively said you cannot do anything as a politician, so he was going to the UN because:

He could raise his own money from whomever he liked, appoint anyone he wanted, control the agenda.

After five days with him at the UN she concluded:

Strong was using the U.N. as a platform to sell a global environment crisis and the Global Governance Agenda.

He created the crisis that the by-product of industry was causing global warming. Even Obama claimed that 97 percent of scientists agree. If he checked the source of the information, he would find the research was completely concocted. It is more likely that 97 percent of scientists never read the IPCC Reports. Those who do express their concern in very blunt terms. Consider German meteorologist and physicist Klaus-Eckart Puls experience.

“Ten years ago, I simply parroted what the IPCC told us. One day I started checking the facts and data – first I started with a sense of doubt but then I became outraged when I discovered that much of what the IPCC and the media were telling us was sheer nonsense and was not even supported by any scientific facts and measurements. To this day, I still feel shame that as a scientist I made presentations of their science without first checking it.”

He discovered what I exposed publicly for years. My challenge to the government version of global warming became increasingly problematic. They couldn’t say I wasn’t qualified. Attacks include death threats, false information about my qualifications posted on the Internet, and three lawsuits from IPCC members. Most people can’t believe that such things occur about opinions in a democratic society. Test the idea by telling people that you don’t accept the human-caused global warming idea. The reaction from most, who know nothing about the science, will invariably be dismissive at best.

I documented what went on in a detailed, fully referenced, book titled The Deliberate Corruption of Climate Science. A lawyer commented that it lays out and effectively supports the case, however, it was “a tough slog.” I recently published a brief ‘non-slog’ handbook (100 pages) for the majority of people, not to insult their intelligence, but to help them understand the science and its misuse for a political agenda.  Titled, Human Caused Global Warming: The Biggest Deception in History. Presented in the logical form of a criminal or journalistic investigation it answers the basic questions, Who, What, Where, When, Why, and How.

It provides the motive and method for the corruption of science to substantiate and bolster Trump’s decision.

Related Articles That You Might Like

Leave a Reply

27 Comments on "Dr. Tim Ball Crushes Climate Change: The Biggest Deception in History"

Notify of
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Thomas Corbett

I am ordering this book. Unfortunately, the link in the article is to Amazon (run by the far left Bezos). Personally, I have given up on Amazon and found new copies on Abe books where the price is 15 cents more but comes with free shipping from the UK. Thanks for the great article and notice of the book.

Joey Virgo

I love you for giving up on Amazon as all customers with a good conscience and who value freedom ought to give up on Amazon. I cancelled my Prime subscription and Jeff Bezos actually gave me all my money back. The trouble with Abebooks is that it is owned by Amazon. Amazon is soon going to own Whole Foods, too. Amazon is anti-free speech, anti-intellectual freedom.

Doug Allitt

Thank you for your work. Just purchased the Kindle edition.


[…] Ref.: https://www.technocracy.news/index.php/2017/06/15/dr-tim-ball-crushes-climate-change-the-biggest-dec… […]

Robyne d\'Ombrille

Professor Bob Carter was the head of Earth Sciences for James Cook university in Australia and was fired because he didn’t agree with the climate change mantra. He was the founding member of the New Zealand climate Science Coalition. This poor man was vilified until his recent death.

Timothy Johnson

I don’t need a PHD in chemistry to understand that CO2 is good for plants. The United States produces more food than any other country in the world and CO2 is helping. Quit demonizing fossil fuels ! Fossil fuels have made our quality of life way better and will continue to make it better. Electric cars are not the answer. Where does the electric power come from to charge the Batteries? Coal fired power. Might as well burn gasoline and diesel. Show me an electric powered semi truck.


I didn’t see any discussion of fossil fuels at all in the article, much less any demonizing. So what are you referring to?
BTW, I’m pretty sure that Tesla is just about ready to launch their semi truck.


Fossil fuels are the major alleged source of those greenhouse gasses “causing” global warming —– context, context, context —

Godfrey Blaque

Timothy Johnson, or airplane, or train, or ship…

Jim Matsunaga

CO2 is not 4% … do the MATH! 400ppm equals.04%


Less than 4 percent of total greenhouse gases vs 400 ppm of the total atmosphere. They are two different references.


4 % – 40,000 ppm


4% of greenhouses gasses, not 4% of ‘air’

Heywood Jablome

4% of total greenhouse gases, not atmosphere, read it again, your comeprehension is suspect

Ian Butler

The author states that “CO2 is only 4 percent of the total greenhouse gases”, so is not talking about 4% of the atmosphere…


4% of greenhouse gases,.04% of atmosphere.


I think he meant 4% of greenhouse gases. Not “air” in total? I think.


This scam was only possible, because there are more stupid people on this planet than any other time in history.


Objective achieved !!! the objective of the Minuscule Elite Global Power Masters is to STUPIDIFY THE MASSES.


[…] Read original article here […]

Michael Ferguson

I read a few sentences of this article until he said something was at its lowest level in 600 million years. Seriously, anyone who believes this earth has been around for that long cannot and should not be trusted as offering any factual evidence whatsoever. The fact that I was directed here for a Christian is even more hilarious.


So, Michael, I presume you also believe the earth is actually 4000 or so years old? I won’t bother you with the science behind the evidence for earth’s age since you seem not to care for evidence or established facts borne out by science. The author is correct in his statement as shown by numerous and recent studies of ice cores from Greenland and Antarctica.

Chip Hall

The Earth is 4.5 Billion years old and has had oxygen in its atmosphere on it for around half of that. At the time each day was roughly 16 hours long. You are hilarious.

Tim Boddington

Perhaps Michael Ferguson you also believe in the flat earth!
The spherical earth has been dated at 4.8 billion years and has had many atmospheres of different composition in that time.


You must be one of those Christians who have absolutely no idea about the assorted calendars that have existed (some still do), their history. Nor the development/ history of the Bible sources and translations.

I suspect you have been “taught” by many passages quoted out of context also.

Once you grasp the concept of context, I believe you will find there is seldom any solid conflict between faith and science — short of a combination of scripture out of context and those laughable “science is settled” statements


The only Internet source for


Stories curated daily from around the world

Subscribe and get the digest!

No SPAM! We will not share your email with any 3rd party.

Thank You for Subscribing!


If you don't receive a confirmation email within a few

minutes, please check  your spam/junk folder.

Wath for a confirmation email.