Any lab experimenting with the creation of or gain-of-function of human pathogens should be summarily terminated and its researchers banned from further activities. The depth and scope of this kind of research goes far beyond just China and the U.S. This has morphed into an arms race in biowarfare, and it is potentially more dangerous that the invention of the atomic bomb in 1945. ⁃ TN Editor
A potentially deadly new strain of COVID has been created in a University lab in London, according to a report.
The Daily Mail reports that researchers at Imperial College London have hybridised the original Wuhan strain of the disease with both the Omicron or Delta variants separately.
The College is yet to reveal how effective the strain they have created is, and has denied that the work constitutes gain of function, the process now widely believed to have been responsible for the original strain in Wuhan.
Molecular biology expert Dr. Richard Ebright warned that the new mutant strain, which was injected into hamsters in London, “is insanity, both in terms of the redundancy and waste,” and that it has zero “foreseeable practical applications.”
At least four labs on two continents now have constructed non-natural, lab-generated viruses that retain the high immune escape of Omicron and acquire higher severity than Omicron and that, as such, are reasonably expected to increase transmission or pathogenicity in humans. https://t.co/jKeDXXNY2G
This is insanity. Both In terms of the redundancy and waste. And, especially, in terms of the risk of triggering a new pandemic wave upon accidental release of the lab-generated viruses–a risk exacerbated by the fact the lab-generated viruses are present in multiple locations.
Dr. Ebright further warned that the development is huge “especially, in terms of the risk of triggering a new pandemic wave upon accidental or deliberate release of the laboratory-generated viruses.”
“This should be a wake-up call,” the biologist urged, adding “If the world wishes to avoid new pandemic waves and pandemics caused by lab-generated enhanced potential pandemic pathogens, then it is urgently necessary to restrict senseless high-risk, low-benefit research that creates enhanced potential pandemic pathogens and to implement effective national oversight, with force of law, on such research.”
"[T]here is no justification for intentionally making potential pandemic viruses more transmissible. The consequences of an accident could be too horrific, and such engineered viruses are not needed for vaccines."
Patrick Wood is a leading and critical expert on Sustainable Development, Green Economy, Agenda 21, 2030 Agenda and historic Technocracy. He is the author of Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation (2015) and co-author of Trilaterals Over Washington, Volumes I and II (1978-1980) with the late Antony C. Sutton.
Dr. Ebright says engineering this deadly COVID strain has zero “foreseeable practical applications.” Oh, it has foreseeable practical applications alright, and it’s hidden in plain sight.
Last edited 7 months ago by Keith
Melissa
November 1, 2022 12:52 pm
There is no such entity as the coronavirus named ‘covid-19’, as it has never actually been seen under a microscope. (It is good at generating profits, however.) So, making the claim that one can ‘combine’ two of these non-entities is nonsense. Zero plus zero still equals zero, guys.
Edward
November 1, 2022 12:54 pm
A question for Steve Watson, the author of the above article: Is the foundation underlying GOF claims scientifically valid? Did Mr. Watson actually read the non-peer reviewed Boston U. preprint before writing his article? If the foundation underpinning GOF research is scientifically baseless, why is any funding by any entity in the public and private sectors being misallocated to GOF research? . https://viroliegy.com/2022/10/24/its-gain-of-fiction-story-time-with-rfk-jr-and-friends/ . https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/pseudoscience “….Any body of knowledge that purports to be scientific or to be supported by science but which fails to comply with the scientific method.…..” https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/Bioweapon-BS:b https://off-guardian.org/2022/05/16/the-function-of-the-fake-binary/ https://off-guardian.org/2022/06/23/the-lab-leak-theory-returns-as-yet-another-fake-binary/ https://projekt-immanuel.de/en/the-rumour-of-the-wuhan-virus-the-origin-of-the-alleged-new-coronavirus/ https://odysee.com/@Projekt-Immanuel:3/ORI_01_bioweapons:3 https://viroliegy.com/2022/04/07/gain-of-fiction/ “…To anyone who may have been taken in by this GOF/Bioweapon narrative, remember… Read more »
[…] Sourced from Technocracy Information & Tendencies […]
Elle
November 1, 2022 2:55 pm
According to Karen Kingston, who has been researching big pharma patents for the last 3-years, there was no virus. It was a military grade bioweapon. What we thought was a spike protein and, were told as much by authority figures and profiteering corporations, was not. No. Under microscopy the bioweapon’s physical appearance is the same as a spike protein. The patents state the facts.
The politicians, university administrators and business leaders that are providing funds for these horrible pathogens should be injected with them as punishment for their evil.
wpDiscuz
[…] Sourced from Technocracy News & Trends […]
[…] Sourced from Technocracy Information & Traits […]
[…] Sourced from Technocracy News & Trends […]
Dr. Ebright says engineering this deadly COVID strain has zero “foreseeable practical applications.” Oh, it has foreseeable practical applications alright, and it’s hidden in plain sight.
There is no such entity as the coronavirus named ‘covid-19’, as it has never actually been seen under a microscope. (It is good at generating profits, however.) So, making the claim that one can ‘combine’ two of these non-entities is nonsense. Zero plus zero still equals zero, guys.
A question for Steve Watson, the author of the above article: Is the foundation underlying GOF claims scientifically valid? Did Mr. Watson actually read the non-peer reviewed Boston U. preprint before writing his article? If the foundation underpinning GOF research is scientifically baseless, why is any funding by any entity in the public and private sectors being misallocated to GOF research? . https://viroliegy.com/2022/10/24/its-gain-of-fiction-story-time-with-rfk-jr-and-friends/ . https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/pseudoscience “….Any body of knowledge that purports to be scientific or to be supported by science but which fails to comply with the scientific method.…..” https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/Bioweapon-BS:b https://off-guardian.org/2022/05/16/the-function-of-the-fake-binary/ https://off-guardian.org/2022/06/23/the-lab-leak-theory-returns-as-yet-another-fake-binary/ https://projekt-immanuel.de/en/the-rumour-of-the-wuhan-virus-the-origin-of-the-alleged-new-coronavirus/ https://odysee.com/@Projekt-Immanuel:3/ORI_01_bioweapons:3 https://viroliegy.com/2022/04/07/gain-of-fiction/ “…To anyone who may have been taken in by this GOF/Bioweapon narrative, remember… Read more »
[…] Sourced from Technocracy Information & Tendencies […]
According to Karen Kingston, who has been researching big pharma patents for the last 3-years, there was no virus. It was a military grade bioweapon. What we thought was a spike protein and, were told as much by authority figures and profiteering corporations, was not. No. Under microscopy the bioweapon’s physical appearance is the same as a spike protein. The patents state the facts.
STEW PETERS W/ FMR PFIZER VP WHISTLEBLOWER Karen Kingston W/ INTEL ON HORRIFIC VAX CONTENTS (bitchute.com)
The politicians, university administrators and business leaders that are providing funds for these horrible pathogens should be injected with them as punishment for their evil.
Absolutely agree.
Let them be used as lab rats to check them out on themselves 1st
YES. Multiple times.
[…] https://www.technocracy.news/now-its-uk-why-are-labs-racing-to-see-who-can-create-the-most-deadly-vi… […]
[…] Now It’s UK: Why Are Labs Racing To See Who Can Create The Most Deadly Virus? […]
[…] Now It’s UK: Why Are Labs Racing To See Who Can Create The Most Deadly Virus? […]