Prominent Scientists Rip Climate Change Ahead of UN Summit: ‘Irrational’ – ‘Nonsense’ – ‘False Path’

Please Share This Story!
TN Note: Sorry, Al Gore. Your “science” is a total scam and you know it. There is a major push to discredit this false science at the Paris summit starting on November 30. The United Nations is using global warming as the motivator to stampede world leaders into accepting Sustainable Development. If enough leaders of other countries understand this, they will balk and turn the summit into chaos.

A team of prominent scientists gathered in Texas today at a climate summit to declare that fears of man-made global warming were “irrational” and “based on nonsense” that “had nothing to do with science.” They warned that “we are being led down a false path” by the upcoming UN climate summit in Paris.

The scientists appeared at a climate summit sponsored by the Texas Public Policy Foundation. The summit in Austin was titled: “At the Crossroads: Energy & Climate Policy Summit.”

Climate Scientist Dr. Richard Lindzen, an emeritus Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology at the Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences at MIT, derided what he termed climate “catastrophism.”

“Demonization of CO2 is irrational at best and even modest warming is mostly beneficial,” Lindzen said.

Lindzen cautioned: “The most important thing to keep in mind is – when you ask ‘is it warming, is it cooling’, etc.  — is that we are talking about something tiny (temperature changes) and that is the crucial point.”

Lindzen also challenged the oft-repeated UN IPCC claim that most of warming over past 50 years was due to mankind.

“People get excited over this. Is this statement alarming? No,” Lindzen stated.

“We are speaking of small changes 0.25 Celcius would be about 51% of the recent warming and that strongly suggests a low and inconsequential climate sensitivity – meaning no problem at all,” Lindzen explained.

“I urge you when looking at a graph, check the scales! The uncertainty here is tenths of a degree,” he noted.

“When someone points to this and says this is the warmest temperature on record. What are they talking about? It’s just nonsense. This is a very tiny change period. And they are arguing over hundredths of a degree when it is uncertain in tenths of a degree,” Lindzen said.

“And the proof that the uncertainty is tenths of a degree are the adjustments that are being made. If you can adjust temperatures to 2/10ths of a degree, it means it wasn’t certain to 2/10ths of a degree,” he said. (Also See: Scientists balk at ‘hottest year’ claims: Ignores Satellites showing 18 Year ‘Pause’ – ‘We are arguing over the significance of hundredths of a degree’ – The ‘Pause’ continues)

“The UN IPCC wisely avoided making the claim that 51% of a small change in temperature constitutes a problem. They left this to the politicians and anyone who took the bait,” he said.

Lindzen noted that National Academy of Sciences president Dr. Ralph Cicerone has even admitted that there is no evidence for a catastrophic claims of man-made global warming. See: Backing away from climate alarm? NAS Pres. Ralph Cicerone says ‘we don’t have that kind of evidence’ to claim we are ‘going to fry’ from AGW

Lindzen also featured 2006 quotes from Scientist Dr. Miike Hulme, Professor of Environmental Sciences at the University of East Anglia, and Director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, admitting that claims of a climate catastrophe were not the “language of science.”

“The discourse of catastrophe is a campaigning device,” Hulme wrote to the BBC in 2006. “The language of catastrophe is not the language of science. To state that climate change will be ‘catastrophic’ hides a cascade of value-laden assumptions which do not emerge from empirical or theoretical science,” Hulme wrote.

“Is any amount of climate change catastrophic? Catastrophic for whom, for where, and by when? What index is being used to measure the catastrophe?” Hulme continued.

Lindzen singled out Secretary of State John Kerry for his ‘ignorance’ on science.

“John Kerry stands alone,” Lindzen said. “Kerry expresses his ignorance of what science is,” he added.

Read full story here…

Join our mailing list!

2 Comment threads
1 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
3 Comment authors
Oliver K. ManuelPatrick Woodwalter77777 Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Notify of

Accepting climate change and adjusting out behaviors to minimize humanity’s influence upon the world’s climate is fail-safe. If climate change is not happening we shall see only that humanity has saved much fossil fuels for later generations and improved the environment.

If we decide that humanity is not causing global warming, and if we do not reduce humanity’s carbon footprint and wwe are wrong our progeny may curse us for having ruined their environment.


Patrick Wood

Your premise if false. The goal is to cap off 100% hydrocarbon extraction by 2030. Our economy is 92% dependent on coal/oil/gas. There is no way to make up the energy deficit that they are trying to create, so this means that economic activity will crater, poverty and hunger will rise. Global warming hysteria is a total scam designed only to drive people into accepting Sustainable Development, which the UN has declared will replace capitalism and free enterprise all together.

Oliver K. Manuel
Oliver K. Manuel

We may be now witnessing the results of:

1. Unreported events in Konan, Korea during a news blackout in Aug-Sept. 1945:


2. Failed attempts by frightened leaders of nuclear nations (now ~15) to hide information about solar eruptions that might trigger false nuclear retaliation:

Solar Energy:

I regret that I was unable to get this message to the public before ResearchGate.

With kind regards,
~Oliver K. Manuel
PhD Nuclear Chemistry
Postdoc Space Physics
Fulbright, Astrophysics
Former NASA Principal
Investigator for Apollo