House Subcommittee Astonished Over FBI’s Facial Recognition Database

Please Share This Story!
Technocrats have no problem with illegal behavior when laws interfere with their scientific social management schemes. In this case, the FBI flagrantly abused the rule of law, and it was fully aware of its violation from the beginning. To say that the FBI, along with the rest of the intel community, has gone rogue is an understatement.  TN Editor

Between civil and criminal mugshot photos, the State Department’s visa and passport databases, the Defense Department’s biometric database, and the drivers’ license databases of 18 states, nearly half of all Americans are in a facial recognition database that the FBI can get at without warrants or without even having to prove they have reasonable suspicion that we’ve done anything wrong.

How did we get in there?

Illegally, that’s how. That was the assessment of last week’s House oversight committee hearing, when politicians and privacy campaigners scathingly took the FBI to task. The committee called for stricter regulation of facial recognition technology at a time when it’s exploding, both in the hands of law enforcement and in business.

The FBI is required, by law, to first publish a privacy impact assessment before it uses facial recognition technology (FRT). For years, it did no such thing, as became clear when the FBI’s Kimberly Del Greco – deputy assistant director of the bureau’s Criminal Justice Information Services Division – was on the hot seat, being grilled by the committee.

Join our mailing list!

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments