Updated: The Miserable Pseudo-Science Behind Face Masks, Social Distancing And Contact Tracing

Masks, Social Distancing And Contact Tracing
Please Share This Story!
image_pdfimage_print
For clarity and accuracy, the section A Matter of Oxygen has been removed and replaced with the section Breath Is Vital To Life.⁃ TN Editor

Once upon a time, there was something called science. It included the discovery of truth about nature, the elements, the universe, etc. It was practiced by honest and accountable practitioners called scientists and engineers. They often invented cool new things as a result of their studies, but generally they had no primal urge to use their knowledge to dominate other people, groups or even entire societies.

Then certain other scientists and engineers rose up and made a discovery of their own. If true science was ever-so-slightly skewed and engineering disciplines were applied to society at large, then they could indeed use their “knowledge” to dominate and control other people, groups, entire societies or even, heaven forbid, the entire planet. 

The first group pursued science. The second group pursued pseudo-science.

Merriam-Webster defines pseudo-science as “a system of theories, assumptions, and methods erroneously regarded as scientific.”  The Oxford dictionary clarifies by stating, “a collection of beliefs or practices mistakenly regarded as being based on scientific method.

Pseudo-science quickly emerged as the principal domain of Technocrats, but they soon found that scientific debate with those promoting real science was most inconvenient to their social engineering goals. The solution was simple: claim that their own pseudo-science was indeed the real science, and then refuse debate by excluding all other voices to the contrary.

In the context of pseudo-science, this report will examine the three primary tools of fighting COVID-19: face masks, social distancing and contact tracing.

Face masks

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) website plainly states that cloth face masks “Will not protect the wearer against airborne transmissible infectious agents due to loose fit and lack of seal or inadequate filtration.” 

But, what about surgical masks? OHSA is clear here also that they “will not protect the wearer against airborne transmissible infectious agents due to loose fit and lack of seal or inadequate filtration.”

But then right under these statements, OSHA furiously backpedaled by adding an FAQ section on COVID-19 directly underneath and stated

OSHA generally recommends that employers encourage workers to wear face coverings at work. Face coverings are intended to prevent wearers who have Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) without knowing it (i.e., those who are asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic) from spreading potentially infectious respiratory droplets to others. This is known as source control.

Consistent with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendation for all people to wear cloth face coverings when in public and around other people, wearing cloth face coverings, if appropriate for the work environment and job tasks, conserves other types of personal protective equipment (PPE), such as surgical masks, for healthcare settings where such equipment is needed most.

So, wearing a face mask cannot protect you from getting COVID, but it is supposedly able to keep someone else from getting it from you? OSHA is speaking out of both sides of its mouth. What it calls “source control” likely puts the real motive out in the open: since you are the source, it’s about controlling YOU. There is no true scientific rationale for anyone but the sick and medical workers to wear masks. 

The truly healthy have no business wearing a mask, period. 

But, what about asymptomatic carriers?

On June 8, 2020, Maria Van Herkhove, PhD., head of the World Health Organization’s emerging diseases and zoonosis unit released a compilation of a number of contact tracing programs from various nations and plainly stated “From the data we have, it still seems to be very rare that an asymptomatic person actually transmits onward to a secondary individual.” 

This writer hates to think what happened to Dr. Herkhove overnight at the hands of her WHO handlers, because the next day she also furiously backpedaled and stated “I used the phrase ‘very rare,’ and I think that that’s misunderstanding to state that asymptomatic transmission globally is very rare. I was referring to a small subset of studies.”

It is clear that Dr. Herkhove’s first statement that naively repeated the clear facts of the matter did not follow the WHO’s justification for non-infectious people to wear masks. In fact, the entire mask wearing narrative hangs on the single pseudo-scientific idea that asymptomatic people can spread the virus. 

In a recent Technocracy News article authored by highly-respected neurosurgeon Dr. Russell Blaylock, MD titled Face Masks Pose Serious Risks To The Healthy, he concluded, “there is insufficient evidence that wearing a mask of any kind can have a significant impact in preventing the spread of this virus.” (Blaylock represents real science.)

Nevertheless, in the face of clear evidence of the worthlessness of face masks for preventing disease, 

  • States and municipalities are mandating that face masks be worn by all citizens when outside their home
  • Large and small companies are forcing their employees to wear masks
  • People at large are scared to death to not wear a face mask for fear of getting sick or being mask-shamed by others if they take it off. 

Breath Is Vital To Life 

Many people believe that face masks lower the percentage of oxygen available for inhaling because you rebreathe much of your exhausted breath. However,  a face mask itself does not retain a significant amount of your exhaled breath since most of it is exhaled through the mask into the open atmosphere. Furthermore, when you inhale, most of the air delivered to your lungs comes from outside the mask.

The real science is much more complicated than the amount of residual air contained within a face mask. 

The real problem with breathing through a mask is that the lungs and chest muscles must exert a lot of extra energy to inhale and exhale. In other words, you must work harder to breathe the same amount of fresh air that you would normally breathe without a mask. 

For this reason, those who already have impaired lung functions, minor as they may be, should never wear a mask unless it is for a specific purpose for a very short period of time. The older you are, especially those over 70, lung capacity and muscle strength decline rapidly. 

This writer has already encountered several retail store employees, forced by their employers to wear a face mask during work hours, who exhibit symptoms like headache, shortness of breath or dizziness. When asked if they relate their symptoms to wearing the mask, every single one has emphatically said “Yes!”.

Workers with the most physically demanding jobs are the most likely to exhibit these kind of symptoms. Other considerations are age, any preexisting conditions of the lungs (like pleurisy, COPD, chronic bronchitis, pneumonia, etc.) or chest muscles and factors like poor physical condition and obesity. Actually, any debilitating health condition should be a red flag. In other words, those who are prone to get winded without a face mask will immediately be at a disadvantage when wearing a mask. The net effect is that the lungs receive less fresh air with vital oxygen even as the body is under more physical stress. 

Every employer and government entity that mandates the wearing of face masks should be required to do two things: first, they should carefully consider each employee as an individual to determine their suitability for wearing a mask.  All factors mentioned above should be included, and in any case, no one should be required to wear a mask if it puts too much stress on their lungs.

Many state-level politicians are now mandating the wearing of face masks for all citizens in public places. They have fallen prey to pseudo-science and are now putting entire populations at risk for physical harm that has nothing to do with the COVID-19 virus.

In sum, lung strength, physical condition, age, pre-existing conditions, physical demands of the job, etc., should all be carefully considered by all. A blanket statement that all employees or all citizens should wear face masks it wholly inappropriate.

Social Distancing

Adding to the fear of contagion, people across the nation are driven to practice social distancing, or staying 6 feet apart at all times. This is practiced to excess in almost every commercial establishment with markers taped or painted on the floor and shopping isles converted into one-way travel only. 

Yet, two real scientists at the University of Oxford in Britain, Professors Carl Heneghan and Tom Jefferson, wrote in The Telegraph (UK) recently that “the two-metre rule has no basis in science.” Their article was titled There is no scientific evidence to support the disastrous two-metre rule.

According to these scientists, 

The influential Lancet review provided evidence from 172 studies in support of physical distancing of one metre or more. This might sound impressive, but all the studies were retrospective and suffer from biases that undermine the reliability of their findings. Recall bias arises in research when participants do not remember previous events accurately, and it is problematic when studies look back in time at how people behaved, including how closely they stood from others.

More concerning was that only five of the 172 studies reported specifically on Covid exposure and proximity with infection. These studies included a total of merely 477 patients, with just 26 actual cases of infection. In only one study was a specific distance measure reported: “came within six feet of the index patient”. The result showed no effect of distance on contracting Covid.

Heneghan and Jefferson further noted, 

On further independent inspection of 15 studies included in the review, we found multiple inconsistencies in the data, numerical mistakes and unsound methods in 13 of them. When assumptions over distance were made, we could not replicate any of them.

This is the hallmark of modern pseudo-science: inconsistencies in the data, numerical mistakes, unsound methods and inability to replicate results. 

What is the real purpose of social distancing? It certainly is not to curtail contagion. The only other possibility is to curtail economic activity and prevent social cohesion. Humans are social beings, after all, and lack of close proximity leads to depression, anxiety and even serious health consequences. 

Contact Tracing

Contact tracing is an established practice in modern medicine. It is useful for the early stages of serious infectious diseases like Ebola, tuberculosis and sexually transmitted diseases like chlamydia.

Every credible expert on contact tracing says that it is effective only up to the point of mass distribution. In other words, during the early stages of a contagion or a slow moving or very serious disease.

In the case of COVID-19, the horse has already left the barn. Except to harass people, there is nothing useful that contact tracing can accomplish.

Yet, almost every state in America is implementing a wide-ranging contact tracing program that may ultimately employ some 300,000 tracers.   

The Center for Disease Control website states that “Contact tracing will be conducted for close contacts (any individual within 6 feet of an infected person for at least 15 minutes) of laboratory-confirmed or probable COVID-19 patients.”

Furthermore, CDC complete definition of “close contact” is,

Someone who was within 6 feet of an infected person for at least 15 minutes starting from 2 days before illness onset (or, for asymptomatic patients, 2 days prior to specimen collection) until the time the patient is isolated.

If you are “exposed” to such a person, your personal information will be collected and you will be contacted by the “tracer” to be instructed to quarantine for up to two weeks. The infected person could have been mistaken about having contact with you. They could be someone who just wants to get you in trouble. If you live in Washington state, where all restaurants are now required to record the contact information of every patron, you might not have a clue who was infected, but you will be quarantined anyway. 

Now, the CDC’s declaration of “6 feet” above takes us back to social distancing, where we just learned above that there is “no effect of distance on contracting COVID” in the first place.

Thus, find that contact tracing misses the mark on two main points: first, the virus is too widespread throughout the population to make tracing effective and second, the criteria of six feet for defining a “contact” is bogus. 

So, why are governors, mayors and health departments ramping up for a nationwide exercise in obtrusive contact tracing? Again, pursuing a path of pseudo-science, the intended outcome is control over people. 

Conclusion

The American public is being spoon-fed a steady diet of pseudo-science in order to justify the wearing of face masks, social distancing and contact tracing. Yet, the actual science points in the polar opposite direction.

Furthermore, those who try to present the real science are shamed, ridiculed and bullied for having such narrow-minded views.  

This is a clear sign of Technocrats-at-work. Instead, these are the ones who should be exposed, shamed and ridiculed. 

In sum, these dangerous and destructive policies are designed to curtail economic activity, break down social cohesion and control people. Moreover, they fit the original mission statement of Technocracy as far back as 1938:

Technocracy is the science of social engineering, the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism to produce and distribute goods and services to the entire population…

It is highly doubtful that most state and local leaders understand the lack of real and verified science behind their actions and mandates. Nevertheless, they are implementing policies that are destructive to our economic system, harmful to our personal health and ruinous to personal liberty.

This writer suggests that you print multiple copies of this report and deliver it to every political leader, every commercial establishment, all family and friends, etc.


Permission is granted to repost or reprint this article with original credit and direct link back to Technocracy.news. An updated PDF version suitable for printing may be downloaded here

Patrick Wood is editor of Technocracy News & Trends, and a leading and critical expert on Sustainable Development, Green Economy, Agenda 21, 2030 Agenda and historic Technocracy.

He is the author of Technocracy: The Hard Road to World Order (2018), Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation (2015) and co-author of Trilaterals Over Washington, Volumes I and II (1978-1980) with the late Professor Antony C. Sutton.

Wood remains a leading expert on the elitist Trilateral Commission, their policies and achievements in creating their self-proclaimed “New International Economic Order” which is the essence of Sustainable Development and Technocracy on a global scale.

Join our mailing list!


About the Author

Patrick Wood
Patrick Wood is a leading and critical expert on Sustainable Development, Green Economy, Agenda 21, 2030 Agenda and historic Technocracy. He is the author of Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation (2015) and co-author of Trilaterals Over Washington, Volumes I and II (1978-1980) with the late Antony C. Sutton.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
60 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mary

They have to keep the game going, the fear of death, the pathos, to continue the next phase. No one seems to be thinking for themselves.

Vonu

Practitioners of pseudoscience should be spoon-fed Jonestown koolaid.

Keith

It was Grape FlavorAid

Sallie Jager

I definitely agree
The whole idea is nonsense and just a power grab for complete control

Cynthia L Williams

I totally agree with you.

Mary

I’m still trying to figure out how you can infect someone when your bodily fluids are not flowing into someone else’s bloodstream or lungs. And who has determined how much, or the strength and the amount of cough or sneeze droplets (cv19) inhaled will infect someone else? No one will fear monger me about infecting anyone with anything. If my bodily fluids are not entering someone else’s body via their lungs or bloodstream. They didn’t”t catch anything from me. That settles it for me. And doctors, healthcare workers and bureaucrats know this too. And I’m not living with guilt because… Read more »

leila parello

I completely agree. Have thought so all along. The intention is control, maybe even curb the population. Wipe out small businesses, and civil liberties. The masks are a symbol of silencing us.

just sayin

And wipe out churches. They don’t like what the Bible says, that we are all sinners in need of a Savior. The Bible’s message speaks of judgment coming and there is no one getting out of here alive. And wipe out churches. They don’t like what the Bible says, that we are all sinners in need of a Savior. The Bible’s message speaks of judgment coming and there is no one getting out of here alive. And wipe out churches. They don’t like what the Bible says, that we are all sinners in need of a Savior. The Bible’s message… Read more »

Last edited 1 month ago by just sayin
Sheila D

Not just population control, population control of minorities especially. Margaret Sanger’s dream come true. Years of race baiting, controlling black education and population, coming to fruition now. You are correct, complete control is the long term goal. They have worked hard to pull this wool over our eyes. How did we let them succeed to this point?

Joe Gideon

We were too busy working to tend to our political responsibilities. That, apathy, cynicism and the go-along-to-get-along mentality. The Left by contrast made time, aided/abetted by Big Media/ Big Education and the Democrat Party…

FakeNews

Masks are the symbol of control, proof that govt has complete control over you

yterri2

Symbolic of keep your mouth shut.

James Pruitt

The real issue with social distancing is movement of people. Aerosols don’t just drift away or fall to the ground….as a person moves forward in line, for example, another moves into that space. If person 1 is infected, exhaling infected aerosols, person 2 moves into the “cloud” and breathes in theses aerosols.
Solution is high volume, laminar downflow air circulation, HEPA filtered. Much like these guys are promoting: https://www.bluesky-global.com/hepa-air-filtration-system/

BullshitMatrix

This is the real curve they want to flatten

BullshitMatrix

here it is, it didnt get loaded in the first comment…

the curve they want to flatten.png
Duncan

The “Would love your thoughts, please comment” tab on the article keeps one from printing the article either using the print key or as pdf.

Karen

I agree with Mary, the public is so whipped that the NWO people can do just about anything to advance their agenda.

Martin

I’m an Amazon delivery driver and we are forced to wear masks or lose our job. It is a very physically demanding job and I find myself having trouble breathing most of the time. I am convinced that the masks are just for show because we ring the bell and walk away from the door anyway. I’ve been given a warning after a zealous customer reported me for not wearing a mask even though I wasn’t on her property, 2 more warnings and I’m fired.

Karen

Martin, and the rest of us that our civil rights are being trashed. You would think that lawyers would be jumping on this. They would win case after case, lots of money for them.

David

That is absolutely disgusting – maybe it’s time to sue Amazon for endangering the health of its employees with enforced mask wearing – then watch how quickly they backpedal on that requirement!

Mary

I’ve been suggesting to people that they get them some face shields from eBay, Amazon or from somewhere. I gave away about 10 out of concern for people. All but 1 are still wearing the rags. Paper and cloth masks are no more safer than wearing a face shield. Most are not waterproof. Face shields are. And if any “super powerful” viruses land on my face shield. I’m not inhaling it over and over. I’m not suffocating with my face shield on either. Scared folks try to convince me to put on the rag under my face shield. I don’t… Read more »

Toni

Thank you so much for this report! I thot with all the rioting going on all over our country all these false regs would have to go away. But looks like it will be a “double-barrel”. I live in small community on OR coast , but even here with we can call it near zero cases, everyone has fallen into the lock-step,but for very few and I am one. No mask, distancing I shirk whenever possible. Big grocery employees have been saying, though, that they are being told it will be for rest of the year! These people are very… Read more »

Donna Means

I live in Washington state. The idea of logging in at a restaurant got nixed before restaurants opened.

THOMAS HUSTON

Have any of you spoken to a chemistry professor? You are not protecting yourself, you are protecting others. American freedom, freedom ,freedom has driven you all mad.

Mary

It’s a shame that some folks are to dumbed down to at least try to build strong immune systems for themselves. It’s like they’re afraid to learn about and practice getting proper nutrition into their bodies. Truth in all things to some folks is anathema. That’s why some on them live with third world health conditions.

Living

If you or anyone else is scared – then please don’t go out! Have everything delivered. The rest of us would like to take the risk (as with anything in life) and continue living! I do not condemn you for being afraid – but don’t ask that others carry your fear! America is Free!!!

Mary

Don’t forget that misery loves company. People are drinking the koolaid, misuninformed and scared. They expect the rest of the world to follow suit. I’m learning to let people live unhappily ever after with their fears, misinformation and delusions.

Blair Huxley

Great article, Patrick! Shared to my 4500 woke Facebook friends and followers as well as a few thousand of sleeping sheep in my community. Every little bit helps! Keep up the great work!!

Chris

This comes from the States but the same issues are applicable here. I would encourage everyone to speak up where ever mandatory masking is imposed. Many employees have been grateful to me as a customer challenging their employer over coercive mask dictates based on official politically motivated guidelines & not legal grounds.  More resources below: Are Mandatory Masks “OSHA”-Approved? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WqhwwLbNZqo&feature=youtu.be Are Mandatory Masks “OSHA”-Approved? Russel Blaylock MD, Neurosurgeon (ret.) https://www.citizensforfreespeech.org/blaylock_face_masks_pose_serious_risks_to_the_healthy?utm_campaign=blaylock_report&utm_medium=email&utm_source=cffs Very good overview https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/the-risks-vs-benefits-of-face-masks-is-there-an-agenda/ Denis Rancourt PhD – Extensive Review (PDF) Masks Don’t Work: A review of science relevant to COVID-19 social policy OSHA Says Masks violate Oxygen Levels https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/osha-says-masks-dont-work-and-violate-osha-oxygen-levels2?utm_campaign=Daily%20Newsletter%3A%20OSHA%20SAYS%20MASKS%20DON%27T%20WORK%20–%20AND%20Violate%20OSHA%20Oxygen%20Levels%20%28RuZ25q%29&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Daily%20Newsletter&_ke=eyJrbF9lbWFpbCI6ICJjb25uaWVmb2dhbEB0ZWx1cy5uZXQiLCAia2xfY29tcGFueV9pZCI6ICJLMnZYQXkifQ%3D%3D Center for… Read more »

Colleen

I agree 100%. I’ve also been using my FB page to bring attention to what I consider a major facet of the dumbing down of America: science illiteracy. Most Americans have NO idea how to evaluate even rudimentary science for validity and reliability including whether or not the research design actually addresses the hypothesis in question. They don’t understand what kinds of inquiries lend themselves well to empirical analysis and when a case study format might actually yield more useful information. They don’t know the difference between authentic scientific language and science doublespeak or spin. It’s appalling to me that… Read more »

Hailey

This is result of generations of conditioning and bad schooling in americas public schools, going back to early 20th century. And that wasnt by accident…todays population being so easily duped by “authority” and “the experts” is the end result. We have literally been engineered to accept this kind of totalitarian take over without any question…

David

Hailey, you have hit the nail squarely on the head. To train a generation to embrace the irrational, you must first bend their grandparents and then warp their parents away from common sense. Kids are ‘learning’ almost nothing useful in school for themselves or those close to them. They struggle daily for approval delivered by social media, and the ‘accepted’ behavior standard issued by a few elite strangers. THAT is what has to change. Patrick Wood is addressing the problem at is current core. Good for both of you!

bevieb

The democrats are thrilled with every looting and burning… they will pay dearly on Nov.3rd. 2020 With every law officer that is killed or injured , the democrats are thrilled…yes they will pay when our President sends their crooked , lying butts to Gitmo!!!

Greg Brown

They have to keep this up so at the end of summer they can declare the second wave has hit and force everything to shut down once again, so the economy is in the tank right before the election. That’s what this has all been about from day one. No science of any kind here.

Fight Censors

NIH 2012 Study: Effectiveness of face masks

“Scientific data on effectiveness of face masks extremely limited and inconsistent. Performance of four different types of face mask fits showed.. protection to be 45%, while under expiratory emissions, protection varied from 33% to 100%”

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3306645/

Irene Grondahl

I live in Sweden, one of few countries where face masks are not recommeded. Throughout this pandemic I have only seen a ahndful of people with face masks and they were Asian and likely wear masks as they would in their native country. Yes we have more deaths than our neighbourig countries, where masks were never required nor used, but many European countries where masks were handed out and much stricter lockdowns imposed have higher death rates. In Sweden we had a higher mortality due to the seasonal flu in Jan 2000 than in May this year. In Jan. 2000… Read more »

Poundy

The scientific method: Observed a NATURAL phenomena, formulate a hypothesis with ‘dependent’ (effect) ‘independent‘ (presumed cause) and ‘control’ variables (things to be held constant during the experiment). Then the researcher/scientist will move to the next step where he/she will validate or invalidate the hypothesis by EXPERIMENT Confirming the ‘null’ or the ‘alternate’ side of the hypothesis = PROVING or DISPROVING if the presumed CAUSE caused the effect. If you are not performing experiments with valid hypothesis and the correct constituent parts and claiming it to be science you are doing pseudo-science by definition. Most people claiming to be ‘scientists’ are… Read more »

christine

its all BS. and no one should comply.

Forearmed

Yeah, yeah, yeah, we get all that but how do we stop their idiocy. We cannot even shop for food once a week without wearing face masks because stores have bought so thoroughly into this stupidity. For all my friends out there, remember this; “Hysteria is just like a virus, but much more transmissible specifically because of the transmissibility within this platform called the World Wide Web.
None of this idiocy is law, SO WHY ARE WE BUYING INTO IT ???

Elizabeth

This right here! Why are people bowing down. I don’t get it.

Joe Gideon

“…the two-metre rule has no basis in science.”
In Mexico, only 1.5 meters. What do Mexicans know that USA and Canada don’t..?

Trina

Control over the people. This is part of the globalists agenda. The One World Order is coming fast and furious crashing onto Americans. Will we wake up in time to STOP their paralyzing control over us?

Diane Heath

Patrick,

Many thanks for all your SOLID research!

….In this brilliant new article,  – https://www.technocracy.news/the-miserable-pseudo-science-behind-face-masks-social-distancing-and-contact-tracing/

2nd paragraph in, “A Matter of Oxygen,” you may want to edit the word “breath” and instead use the word “breathe.”

….At least with this error, we can tell that your work is nurtured and written by a passionate human being…✨??

Best regards and gratitude,

Diane Heath ?

Lori C

In the article you state: “Every employer and government entity that mandates the wearing of face masks are required to do two things: first, they must provide atmospheric testing to each person to measure average oxygen levels inside the mask when it is being worn and second, if oxygen is below 19.5%, they must be provided with an oxygen enriched breathing system.” Can you provide a source for this? Thank you.

Elizabeth
DON BILL

Who was it that said: “Never, ever underestimate the power of human stupidity”?

Chris Cross

This video mentioned Dr Hugh Nail former CEO of Biota Holdings, who said long before the lockdowns. “Spread by Latent carrier” THEORY, has no supporting evidence:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E9JYt7At75g

SayWhat

Washington State does not require restaurants to record customers visits. The Governor initially proposed that but walked that back after complaints. I’ve been out to eat three times now and no info about me or my party was ever recorded.

Marshall Lentini

Weird that “I can’t breathe” became a thing just after masks were imposed. I guess only Mr Floyd had a right to unobstructed breath, being black.

Ellen

They keep changing the information on OSHA. Watched a video and tried to go to the page she had up, but it was gone. Looked for it another way. This link now says https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/diy-cloth-face-coverings.html “Use of Cloth Face Coverings to Help Slow the Spread of COVID-19” Sacramento County California put out a warning about N95 masks during the fires. https://www.metrofire.ca.gov/index.php/news-releases/889-n95-respirator-announcement I got into some huuuge trouble for trying to get some older people (my age) to understand that death is not looming at their doors in the form of COVID; I explained this pandemic is 1/6 the magnitude of the… Read more »

Last edited 1 month ago by Ellen
Glenn McCorkle

Myself and IMO, everyone else in this world possessing more than half a brain in their head have been saying similar right from the get-go. But, the overwhelming majority of people flatly refuse to listen to the truth. 🙁 It is easier to fool people than it is to convince them that they have been fooled. — Mark Twain —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————- 260) Sat, 2020-04-11 – 09:58:37 (GMT-0500) glennmcc> This experiment being run by the worlds governments to see just how difficult it would be to create a worldwide panic and seize virtual total control has been a total success for them… Read more »

Last edited 1 month ago by Glenn McCorkle
Camilo

Great article but be careful not to give credibility to the false premise of “The Global Pandemic”.
Remember, this is a manufactured crisis in the first place.

Last edited 1 month ago by Camilo
Lynda The Great

It all makes sense now.
Democrats want to deprive our brains of oxygen so we’ll vote for them.
Freaking GENIUS!
Yet another reason not to be part of the sheeple.
Because he who controls the narrative, controls the sheeple.

Sharon W.

Kept in context of current events-
Many see a mask…I see a muzzle!
Some read “social distancing”…I read “anti-social”.
Some feel safety…I see danger.

Ray

How about this little tidbit?

face cover.png

[…] […]