Cities Urged To Reject Federal Government, Go It Alone

Please Share This Story!
The future of globalization and Sustainable Deveopment is seen in cities, not nation-states. The rise of autonomous cities is seen throughout the world, and global interests are whispering in the ears of U.S. mayors to effectively secede from the Federal government. ‚ĀÉ TN Editor

The mayors are coming. In recent months, City Hall occupants in Tallahassee, Nashville, and Tuscaloosa have won Democratic primaries for their state’s gubernatorial races. Mayor Eric Garcetti of Los Angeles, former New Orleans Mayor Mitch Landrieu, and former San Antonio Mayor Julian Castro are rumored to be considering White House bids in 2020. City leaders seeking higher office are banking on the idea that voters will respond to what cities embody today: innovation, diversity, and progress.

In the Age of Trump,¬†some experts¬†have been urging cities to¬†declare independence¬†from the federal-level chaos in Washington. Others herald¬†local power¬†and¬†local actions¬†as antidotes to national dysfunction. Across the country, corporations and philanthropies are pouring millions of dollars into city initiatives, attracted by the notion that solutions in urban areas‚ÄĒon issues like economic development, clean energy, and resilience‚ÄĒmight bubble up to the national level.

I understand the impulse. From the perch of a national think tank on cities, I see cities mounting promising responses to big problems like climate change, housing affordability, and criminal justice. At the Brookings Institution, we help local and regional leaders accelerate solutions to global competitiveness and shared prosperity.

But city boosterism can also go too far: Urging city leaders to go it alone celebrates a deep dysfunction in federalism‚ÄĒand it normalizes a self-destructive shift in politics and governance.

For instance, the Trump administration is using the narrative of increased local capacity to justify¬†draconian cuts to federal supportfor cities, from¬†transit programs,¬†community development financing, to the entire Economic Development Administration. The¬†president‚Äôs 2019 budget¬†notes that it ‚Äú‚Ķrecognizes a greater role for state and local governments and the private sector to address community and economic development needs,‚ÄĚ signaling abdication of a longstanding federal role in those areas.

Further, federal policies do matter, whether city leaders like it or not. Federal deportation forces are striking fear into city and suburban immigrant communities. The new tax law imposes a limit on state and local tax deductions, making it more economically and politically costly for city governments to raise revenue. Tariffs are threatening companies and jobs across all kinds of communities but the Trump administration proposes to protect farmers from those effects with billions of dollars in subsidies provided by urban and suburban taxpayers. City-by-city actions can’t overcome national policies that broadly undermine urban America.

And as Sherrilyn Ifill of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund¬†has observed, extolling the virtues of localism papers over the dark history of ‚Äúlocal control‚ÄĚ in America, where deference to local decision-makers has yielded persistent racial segregation and the active suppression of minority voting rights. ‚ÄúWe should not romanticize localism,‚ÄĚ Ifill wrote, responding to the recent¬†New York Times¬†column¬†on ‚ÄúThe Localist Revolution‚ÄĚ by David Brooks. ‚ÄúIt has often been brutish, oppressive & violent.‚ÄĚ

Read full story here…

Notify of

Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments