CNAS: Globalist Think Tank And The Subtleties Of Disinformation

Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Victoria Nuland briefs reporters during a Department Press Briefing, from the U.S. Department of State in Washington, D.C. on January 11, 2022. [State Department Photo by Freddie Everett, Wikimedia Commons]
Please Share This Story!
This article is written by a research assistant at the Center for a New American Security (CNAS), which has two members of the Trilateral Commission on its board. The article deflects attention to China and Russia as the most likely abusers of AI while ignoring current abuses by our own government. In fact, for Technocracy, there is no such thing as the “free world”.

The current head of CNAS, Victoria Nuland, served Deputy National Security Adviser to Vice President Dick Chaney in the Bush administration, also was a member of the Trilateral Commission. She recently resigned her post in the Biden Administration as Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs. ‚ĀÉ TN Editor

This is very subtle disinformation that directs attention away from Technocracy and the WEF’s Great Reset initiative. ‚ĀÉ TN Editor [/su_note]

Generative AI is poised to be the free world‚Äôs next great gift to authoritarians. The viral launch of ChatGPT ‚ÄĒ a system with eerily human-like capabilities in composing essays, poetry and computer code ‚ÄĒ has¬†awakened¬†the world‚Äôs dictators to the transformative power of generative AI to create unique, compelling content at scale.

But the fierce¬†debate¬†that has ensued among Western industry leaders on the risks of releasing advanced generative AI tools has largely missed where their effects are likely to be most pernicious: within autocracies. AI companies and the U.S. government alike must institute stricter norms for the development of tools like ChatGPT in full view of their game-changing potential for the world‚Äôs authoritarians ‚ÄĒ before it is too late.

So far, concerns around generative AI and autocrats have mostly focused on how these systems can turbocharge Chinese and Russian propaganda efforts in the United States. ChatGPT has already demonstrated generative AI’s ability to automate Chinese and Russian foreign disinformation with the push of a button. When combined with advancements in targeted advertising and other new precision propaganda techniques, generative AI portends a revolution in the speed, scale and credibility of autocratic influence operations.

But however daunting Chinese and Russian foreign disinformation efforts look in a post-GPT world, open societies receive only a small fraction of the propaganda that Beijing and Moscow blast into their own populations. And whereas democratic powers maintain robust communities of technologists dedicated to combating online manipulation, autocrats can use the full power of their states to optimize their propaganda’s influence.

In 2019, China‚Äôs¬†Xi Jinping¬†demanded just that when he¬†ordered¬†his party-state to leverage AI to ‚Äúcomprehensively increase‚ÄĚ the ability of the Chinese Communist Party to mold Chinese public opinion. Russia‚Äôs¬†Vladimir Putin¬†has similarly¬†doubled down¬†on AI-enabled propaganda in the wake of his Ukraine invasion, including a fake video of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky calling for Ukrainians to surrender. These efforts are buttressed by a dizzying array of¬†Chinese¬†and¬†Russian¬†agencies tasked with thought control, cultivating a competitive ecosystem of digital propaganda tools underwritten by¬†multibillion-dollar budgets each year.

China and Russia are, in other words, fertile ground for generative AI to usher in a historic breakthrough in brainwashing ‚ÄĒ a recipe for more international¬†catastrophes, greater human rights¬†abuses, and further entrenched¬†despotism. As China refines and exports its techno-authoritarianism, would-be tyrants the world over are likely to cash in on the propaganda revolution.

Luckily, companies in the United States and allied nations have largely led the advance of generative AI capabilities. As the technology matures, this advantage will be increasingly important in giving open societies time to understand, detect and mitigate potential harms before autocratic states leverage the technologies for their own ends. But the free world risks squandering this advantage if these pioneering tools are easily acquired by authoritarians.

Unfortunately, keeping cutting-edge AI models out of autocrats’ hands is a tall order. On a technical level, generative AI models lend themselves to easy theft. Despite requiring enormous resources to build, once developed, models can be easily copied and adapted at minimal cost. That’s especially bad news as China routinely pillages American corporations’ tech.

Read full story here…

About the Editor

Patrick Wood
Patrick Wood is a leading and critical expert on Sustainable Development, Green Economy, Agenda 21, 2030 Agenda and historic Technocracy. He is the author of Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation (2015) and co-author of Trilaterals Over Washington, Volumes I and II (1978-1980) with the late Antony C. Sutton.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

[…] Read original article […]

John Soupus, Esquire

This article is written by a research assistant at the Center for a New American Security (CNAS), which has two members of the Trilateral Commission on its board. The article deflects attention to China and Russia as the most likely abusers of AI while ignoring current abuses by our own government. In fact, for Technocracy, there is no such thing as the ‚Äúfree world‚ÄĚ. And there never has been anything known as the “free world”. If they can lock us down for two months, much less two years…on an absolute whim…without people falling at my feet (see below)…well, then they… Read more »

[…] CNAS: Globalist Think Tank And The Subtleties Of Disinformation […]