It was no misÂtake of hisÂtory that China transÂformed from a ComÂmuÂnist dicÂtaÂtorÂship into a neo-authoritarian Technocracy.
In this regard, the influÂence of the TriÂlatÂeral ComÂmisÂsion, its memÂbers and poliÂcies on the world stage can hardly be quanÂtiÂfied. The ComÂmisÂsion, founded by David RockÂeÂfeller and ZbigÂniew Brzezinski in 1973, drew memÂberÂship from North America, Europe and Japan. Out of approxÂiÂmately 300 memÂbers, only 86 were origÂiÂnally from the United States, and yet they corÂpoÂrately devised and pushed poliÂcies that suited the entire memÂberÂship, and did so under a virÂtual cloak of invisÂiÂbility that lasts even into 2013.
Today, we reap the âbenÂeÂfitsâ of TriÂlatÂeral manipÂuÂlaÂtion. The EuroÂpean economy is trashed, Japanâs economy is still smolÂdering from the mid-1990âs and the U.S. is much worse off today than in the late 1960âs. But, the politÂical sysÂtems of these counÂtries are not much better off than their economies. The fruit of decay in the United States is painfully eviÂdent with a fracÂtured and conÂtentious politic that defies recÂonÂcilÂiÂaÂtion on even the most minor issues.
My friends at CoaliÂtion for a ProsÂperous America and Economy in Crisis, among others, are working hard to offset messed-up trade poliÂcies that put AmerÂican industry in the toilet over the last 30Â years. As long as we have some freedom of speech left, orgaÂniÂzaÂtions like these are a welÂcome voice, even if they are shouted down by the global free-trade cartel.
HowÂever, people need to know where and how this all started, and who was responÂsible for it. Only by underÂstanding the genÂesis of globÂalÂizaÂtion can modern ecoÂnomics, polÂiÂtics and social trends be underÂstood. Can anyone say, âPin the tail on the donkey?â
Thirty-five years ago, in the November 1978 and April 1979 issues of TriÂlatÂeral Observer, Antony C. Sutton and myself wrote the folÂlowing analysis on China. We warned of the disÂasÂtrous effects that would result if these poliÂcies moved forÂward, and we thorÂoughly exposed the memÂbers of the TriÂlatÂeral ComÂmisÂsion who were almost solely responÂsible for Chinaâs ascenÂdent rise as a world power. That no one lisÂtened at the time is self-evident, because nothing changed and no one resisted. (For clarÂiÂfiÂcaÂtion, names of TriÂlatÂeral ComÂmisÂsion memÂbers are in bold type.)
TriÂlatÂeral China Policy
The policy of ânorÂmalÂizaÂtionâ of relaÂtions with ComÂmuÂnist Chinaâââin effect a proÂgram to build China techÂnoÂlogÂiÂcally into a super powerâââwas impleÂmented by ZbigÂniew Brzezinski.
A high ranking AdminÂisÂtraÂtion source is reported as saying: âThis was Zbigâs baby more than anyone elseâs.:
From outÂside the White House (from a top policy maker who genÂerÂally sides with Cyrus Vance):
âZbig is really riding high now. He had the cenÂtral role behind the scenes, and he was all alone in the press play. Iâm told the PresÂiÂdent thinks Zbig did 99 perÂcent of the work on China.â
More likely, howÂever, the China policy was forÂmuÂlated and impleÂmented by a TriÂlatÂerÂalist troika: Jimmy Carter, Cyrus Vance and Brzezinski. And this policy was only a conÂtinÂuÂaÂtion of a policy begun under a âRepubÂlicanâ AdminÂisÂtraÂtion, that of Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger, another Trilateralist.
The heady effect that these vast policy making exerÂcises have on these men, almost an infanÂtile reacÂtion, is well reported in the WashÂington Post on FebÂruary 8, 1979 with the headÂline, China Policy: A Born-Again Brzezinski,describing how Brzezinski excitÂedly describes his meeting with Teng [aka Deng Xiaoping]:
FEBURARY 1979âââThe eyes sparkle with exciteÂment even days later. The arms erupt in sudden sweeping gesÂtures when he talks about it. And that causes the photosâââabout a dozen of themâââto fly out of ZbigÂniew Brzezinskiâs hands and scatter over the floor of his office as he is speaking.
 âHereâs Cy⌠and here I am⌠and there is Teng right between us.⌠â
 Brzezinski is talking in that quick. clipped, excited style that is his way, and he is pointing at one photo that remains in his hand while he bends to scoop up the rest, talking all the while.
 âItâs amazing, when you think of it. The leader of a bilÂlion peopleâââhaving dinner in my house just two hours after he arrived in this country!
 âI mean, it really is rather amazing!â
TriÂlatÂerÂalÂists And The China Trade
An example of the influÂence of a mere handful of TriÂlatÂerÂalÂists in creÂating self-serving poliÂcies many thouÂsands of miles from the United States, can be illusÂtrated by a recent conÂferÂence in Japan.
In early FebÂruary 1979 a symÂpoÂsium on the China Trade was sponÂsored by the Japanese newsÂpaper Nihon Keizai. The few speakers were mainly TriÂlatÂerÂalÂists, and the TriÂlatÂerals agreed with one anothersâ proÂposals thus creÂating a power bloc. Reporting in the U.S., the WashÂington Post (FebÂruary 9, 1979) cited only TriÂlatÂerÂalist speakers.
The key Japanese speaker was TriÂlatÂerÂalist Kiichiro Kitaura, Chairman of Numuru SecuÂriÂties ComÂpany, Ltd.
What were Kitauraâs proÂposals? They were:
- InterÂnaÂtionÂalize the yen
- ConÂsulÂtaÂtions and coopÂerÂaÂtion between Japanese and AmerÂican busiÂnessmen on ways to penÂeÂtrate the ChiÂnese market
- âBlendingâ Japanese and AmerÂican technology
Of course, Kitaura thorÂoughly agreed with fellow TriÂlatÂerÂalist Philip Trezise (from BrookÂings InstiÂtuÂtion) that Japanâs large curÂrent account surÂplus should be invested abroad and not in Japan. Trezise was backed by another AmerÂican TriÂlatÂerÂalist, Peter G. Peterson, Chairman of Lehman Brothers, Kuhn Loeb, Inc., who, like Kitaura, urged more Japanese trade.
In brief, this imporÂtant conÂferÂence was domÂiÂnated by TriÂlatÂerÂalist thinking, and that was the only thinking reported, yet on the surÂface the TriÂlatÂeral link is not apparent to the lay reader.
 TriÂlatÂeral Buildup of ComÂmuÂnist China
TriÂlatÂerals proÂpose to build up ComÂmuÂnist China. TriÂlatÂerÂalist policy is clear cut. The West must aid the conÂstrucÂtion of ComÂmuÂnist China: this is expressed in An Overview of East-West RelaÂtions (TriÂangle Paper No. 15, p. 57) as follows:
âTo grant China favorÂable conÂdiÂtions in ecoÂnomic relaÂtions is defÂiÂnitely in the politÂical interest of the Westâ adding ââŚthere seems to exist sufÂfiÂcient ways for aiding China in acceptÂable forms with advanced civilian technology.â
TriÂangle paper 15 also adds:
âThe sitÂuÂaÂtion is difÂferent⌠where arms supÂplies or advanced milÂiÂtary techÂnoloÂgies are conÂcerned, except for types of equipÂment that by their nature serve purely defenÂsive purÂposes.â (p. 58)
In fact, as we shall see later, TriÂlatÂeral firms have exported even advanced milÂiÂtary techÂnology to ComÂmuÂnist China.
FurÂther, as part of one world, TriÂlatÂerÂalÂists see an ultiÂmate merging of free enterÂprise Taiwan with the ComÂmuÂnist mainÂland. Even more remarkÂable, the paper envisÂages that ComÂmuÂnist China will return to an expanÂsionist aggresÂsive policy under two conditions:
- as ComÂmuÂnist China âgets stronger,â
- if relaÂtions with the Soviets are ânormalized.â
The paper adds, âalready now, the activity of ComÂmuÂnist GuerÂrillas in ThaiÂland and Malaysia, linked to each other and looking to China, perÂsists and even seem to be on the increase.â (page 59)
So far as ComÂmuÂnist China is conÂcerned, we may conÂclude that Trilaterals:
- Want to build ComÂmuÂnist China into a milÂiÂtary superpower,
- wish to do this with the full and clear underÂstanding that China will likely resume its expanÂsionist course in the Far East, and
- are willing to subÂsiÂdize guerÂrilla activÂiÂties in ThaiÂland and Malaysia (much of the âcivilian techÂnologyâ curÂrently being transÂferred has useÂfulÂness for guerÂrilla warfare.)
TechÂnocÂracy Recognized
The transfer of techÂnology was a key aspect of early TriÂlatÂeral policy. AdmitÂtedly, their stated goal of âfosÂtering a New InterÂnaÂtional EcoÂnomic Orderâ was not fully underÂstood in 1978âââ79. HowÂever, by June 2001, at least one writer for Time MagÂaÂzine (conÂnected with the TriÂlatÂeral ComÂmisÂsion, by the way) got it perÂfectly in Made in China: The Revenge of the Nerds:Â China had been conÂverted into a TechÂnocÂracy! According to the author, Kaiser Kuo:
The nerds are runÂning the show in todayâs China. In the twenty years since Deng Xiaopingâs [Ed. Note: count backÂward to 1978âââ79] reforms kicked in, the comÂpoÂsiÂtion of the ChiÂnese leadÂerÂship has shifted markedly in favor of techÂnocrats. âŚItâs no exagÂgerÂaÂtion to describe the curÂrent regime as a techÂnocÂracy.
After the Maoist madÂness abated and Deng Xiaoping inauÂguÂrated the opening and reforms that began in late 1978, sciÂenÂtific and techÂnical intelÂlecÂtuals were among the first to be rehaÂbilÂiÂtated. RealÂizing that they were the key to the Four ModÂernÂizaÂtions embraced by the reformers, conÂcerted efforts were made to bring the âexpertsâ back into the fold.
During the 1980s, techÂnocÂracy as a conÂcept was much talked about, espeÂcially in the conÂtext of so-called âNeo-Authoritarianismââââthe prinÂciple at the heart of the âAsian DevelÂopÂmental Modelâ that South Korea, SinÂgaÂpore, and Taiwan had purÂsued with apparent sucÂcess. The basic beliefs and assumpÂtions of the techÂnocrats were laid out quite plainly: Social and ecoÂnomic probÂlems were akin to engiÂneering probÂlems and could be underÂstood, addressed, and evenÂtuÂally solved as such.
The open hosÂtility to reliÂgion that BeiÂjing exhibits at timesâââmost notably in its obsesÂsive drive to stamp out the âevil cultâ of Falun Gongâââhas pre-Marxist roots. SciÂenÂtism underÂlies the post-Mao techÂnocÂracy, and it is the orthoÂdoxy against which hereÂsies are meaÂsured. [Emphasis added]
Thus, during the 1980âs TechÂnocÂracy (and sciÂenÂtism) took deep root not only in China, but also in South Korea, SinÂgaÂpore and Taiwan. SimÂilar gains were seen in Europe during the 1990âs and in the United States since 1973. The TriÂlatÂeral Commissionâs utopian âNew InterÂnaÂtional EcoÂnomic Orderâ is TechÂnocÂracy, and China was the first modern experÂiÂment and transÂforÂmaÂtion. And, why not China? Dealing with a single ComÂmuÂnist dicÂtator was a lot easier than dealing with a parÂliaÂment, conÂgress or senate in more demoÂcÂratic nations. The so-called âNeo-Authoritarianismâ menÂtioned above is ample eviÂdence that the chamÂpions of TechÂnocÂracy knew full-well that it would be easier to transÂform an already authorÂiÂtarian nation into authoritarianism one; in fact, as far back as 1932, origÂinal memÂbers of TechÂnocÂracy, Inc. in the U.S. called for a dicÂtaÂtorÂship in the U.S. in order to impleÂment Technocracy.
This is the rest of the story, of which I was a keen observer at the time. What I lacked in eduÂcaÂtion and acaÂdÂemic disÂciÂpline was amply shored up by the conÂsumÂmate researcher and scholar, Antony Sutton, who was a proÂfessor of ecoÂnomics and a research fellow at Stanfordâs presÂtiÂgious Hoover InstiÂtuÂtion for War Peace and RevÂoÂluÂtion in CalÂiÂfornia. Sutton is widely recÂogÂnized as most detailed and proÂlific writer in the 20th cenÂtury on the transfer of techÂnology from the West to the East.
Brazinsky and Kissinger met with a young Obama in November 1971 and secretly recruited him into the organization and groomed him to become President. Obama disappeared to Russia until 1972 then he enrolled at Columbia.
Doug, Brazinsky? Obama was not 10 years old living in Indonesia as Barry Soetero? 2 years before Trilateral Commission was formed? Obama enters Harvard at 11 years old?
What do you think about China and Russia binding their currencies to gold, each other and to the europian SWIFT payment system. Do you think they try to gain economic freedom from the triliteral comission and is it possible they crash the dollar as world-currency, in the same way the Sovjet Union was crushed by hyper inflation 1989?
What better way to crush America, degrade it’s independence by transfering industry and technology to China, where the multinational corporations feed off of cheap labor, and a castrated US, will eventually clamor for authoritarian rule, as the Congress becomes ineffectual, poverty creeps higher, and you have change in the winds of a Constitution under fire. Bernie by the way is a graduate of The New School. If we don’t wake up, we are doomed. If it’s not too late already.
Are there any articles written on what effect(s) the Trilateral Commission, also, the Bilderberg Group are having on the most recent presidential election in the United States? For sure the news media outlets aren’t saying anything. I honestly believe there influence is having a major effect effect. However, much of what is known about their activity is secret therefore very little information will ever get out to the public till their objectives are met.
Most people don’t have a clue as to what Technocracy is or isn’t. Technocracy is simply a government based on the laws of nature, where observable cause and effect realities dictate the solutions to our most complex energy related problems. Technocracy cannot be corrupted by any form of entertainment and or political-financial interference elements because it transcends the myth of value as it seeks to free up abundant energy resources and technologies for everyone’s great benefit. Think of Technocracy as a way to serve the people without the cloak of deception that we currently use for disseminating propaganda and or… Read more »
Robert, you are a true Technocrat in the classic sense. Your ‘movement’ and ideology was hijacked from you in 1973 and developed into Sustainable Development, Green Economy. Read my book Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation and face the facts.
Hello Patrick, respectfully. You’re not talking about Technocracy, you’re talking about something entirely different. You’re writing about political ideologies that are tied into financial objectives, in which case, there is no viable Technate. So why even talk about Technocracy? Communism and or Capitalism is not a Technocracy, because they are part of an ongoing clowncracy in which the private-mythically based money supply informs us as to who is valued and who is not, as reality based energy solutions that currently exist are ignored. Please don’t tie Technocracy in with communism, because Technocracy transcends any form of Alice’s political Wonderland. As… Read more »
Robert, you are not paying attention to what I have say now, said before and have written about. I have never, ever stated that Technocracy has anything to do with Communism. In fact, I always go out of my way to pointedly make clear that Technocracy is NOT Communism. Communism was anathema to Technocrats. I know what Technocracy is and have read and studied every original document in the massive archive of Technocracy at the University of Alberta in Edmonton. Furthermore, I have every book and article that was written about it since 1932. Robert, we have nothing left to… Read more »
Technocracy cannot and was never hijacked by any political-financially vested interest. This is an impossibility, sir, because the very nature of Technocracy is based on the FACTS of nature and not on any easily repudiated political opinions. The original Technocrat who I’ve concerned myself with over the years doesn’t get any credit for being a Technocrat, his name was Nikola Tesla, he preceded Howard Scott at Columbia University and his primary concern was simply to find ways to free up energy for everyone’s great benefit without any political-financial interference. M. King Hubbert, Charles Steinmetz and company actually hijacked the idea… Read more »
In 1938, Technocracy’s official magazine, The Technocrat, succinctly defined Technocracy as “…the science of social engineering, the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism to produce and distribute goods and services to the entire population.” What part of ‘social engineering’ do you not understand? We don’t want ‘social engineering’. We don’t want to be a ‘scientific operation’. We don’t want to hand over control of production and consumption to scientists or engineers. Hubbert did not work for Shell in 1938 when the above definition was published. The prestigious engineers and scientists at Columbia University in 1932 who organized Technocracy with… Read more »
Americans suffer from being 39th on the global literacy scale and being a society that relies more on brainwashing for social compliance rather than evidence-based logic and knowledge. It would help Americans to read about the genesis of free trade and its origins in the investment banker industry, through the eyes of non-Americans. This produces a very different picture of the world. For this and other reasons, I condensed three volumes to 60 pages, which looks at the impact of free trade and privatisation on Australia… the most similar nation to America on Earth. Visit oziz4oziz.com/ and read about what… Read more »
[…] da manipulação da Comissão Trilateral – “o bébé” de Zbigniew Brzezinski. […]
[…] previously told EpochTVâs âCrossroadsâ that the technocracy idea was introduced to communist China in the 1970s by Zbigniew Brzezinski, a political scientist, co-founder of the […]
[…] previously told EpochTVâs âCrossroadsâ that the technocracy idea was introduced to communist China in the 1970s by Zbigniew Brzezinski, a political scientist, co-founder of the […]
[…] previously told EpochTVâs âCrossroadsâ that the technocracy idea was introduced to communist China in the 1970s by Zbigniew Brzezinski, a political scientist, co-founder of the […]
[…] told EpochTVâs âCrossroadsâ that the technocracy idea was introduced to communist China in the 1970s by Zbigniew Brzezinski, a political scientist, co-founder of the […]
[…] Likewise, almost solely responÂsible for Chinaâs ascendant rise as a world power came from the impact of the Rockerfeller/ TriÂlatÂerÂal Commission policy of 1979. The West aided the technocratic development of ComÂmuÂnist China.More: https://www.technocracy.news/trilateral-commission-converted-china-technocracy/ […]